All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Bintian <bintian.wang@huawei.com>,
	hujianyang@huawei.com
Subject: [f2fs-dev] Dwrite with non-aligned offset and size
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:55:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556C481C.1050400@huawei.com> (raw)

Hi Jaegeuk,

We run ltp testcase with f2fs and obtain a TFAIL in diotest4, the result in detail is
as fallow:

dio04

<<<test_start>>>
tag=dio04 stime=1432278894
cmdline="diotest4"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
diotest4    1  TPASS  :  Negative Offset
diotest4    2  TPASS  :  removed
diotest4    3  TFAIL  :  diotest4.c:129: write allows odd count.returns 1: Success
diotest4    4  TFAIL  :  diotest4.c:183: Odd count of read and write
diotest4    5  TPASS  :  Read beyond the file size
......

the result of ext4 with same environment:

dio04

<<<test_start>>>
tag=dio04 stime=1432259643
cmdline="diotest4"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
diotest4    1  TPASS  :  Negative Offset
diotest4    2  TPASS  :  removed
diotest4    3  TPASS  :  Odd count of read and write
diotest4    4  TPASS  :  Read beyond the file size
......

Does f2fs allow dwrite with non-aligned offset and size? I check the code and found
dwrite with non-aligned offset and size will turn into buffered write. Whether it will
have some impact on user layer applications?

I wrote a patch, not well tested, how do you think of it?

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 9bedfa8..ba5d94c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -2010,8 +2010,9 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
         if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
                 return 0;

-       if (check_direct_IO(inode, iter, offset))
-               return 0;
+       err = check_direct_IO(inode, iter, offset)
+       if (err)
+               return -EINVAL;

         trace_f2fs_direct_IO_enter(inode, offset, count, iov_iter_rw(iter));

I wish you and other developers in this list could help me in a correct way.

Thanks,
He


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bintian <bintian.wang@huawei.com>, <hujianyang@huawei.com>
Subject: [f2fs-dev] Dwrite with non-aligned offset and size
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 19:55:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556C481C.1050400@huawei.com> (raw)

Hi Jaegeuk,

We run ltp testcase with f2fs and obtain a TFAIL in diotest4, the result in detail is
as fallow:

dio04

<<<test_start>>>
tag=dio04 stime=1432278894
cmdline="diotest4"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
diotest4    1  TPASS  :  Negative Offset
diotest4    2  TPASS  :  removed
diotest4    3  TFAIL  :  diotest4.c:129: write allows odd count.returns 1: Success
diotest4    4  TFAIL  :  diotest4.c:183: Odd count of read and write
diotest4    5  TPASS  :  Read beyond the file size
......

the result of ext4 with same environment:

dio04

<<<test_start>>>
tag=dio04 stime=1432259643
cmdline="diotest4"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
diotest4    1  TPASS  :  Negative Offset
diotest4    2  TPASS  :  removed
diotest4    3  TPASS  :  Odd count of read and write
diotest4    4  TPASS  :  Read beyond the file size
......

Does f2fs allow dwrite with non-aligned offset and size? I check the code and found
dwrite with non-aligned offset and size will turn into buffered write. Whether it will
have some impact on user layer applications?

I wrote a patch, not well tested, how do you think of it?

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 9bedfa8..ba5d94c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -2010,8 +2010,9 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
         if (f2fs_encrypted_inode(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
                 return 0;

-       if (check_direct_IO(inode, iter, offset))
-               return 0;
+       err = check_direct_IO(inode, iter, offset)
+       if (err)
+               return -EINVAL;

         trace_f2fs_direct_IO_enter(inode, offset, count, iov_iter_rw(iter));

I wish you and other developers in this list could help me in a correct way.

Thanks,
He


             reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 11:55 He YunLei [this message]
2015-06-01 11:55 ` [f2fs-dev] Dwrite with non-aligned offset and size He YunLei
2015-06-01 23:01 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-06-02  4:21   ` He YunLei
2015-06-02  4:21     ` He YunLei
2015-07-03  8:02     ` Chao Yu
2015-07-16  2:57       ` He YunLei
2015-07-16 10:13         ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-07-17  2:16           ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556C481C.1050400@huawei.com \
    --to=heyunlei@huawei.com \
    --cc=bintian.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=hujianyang@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.