All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix survey information reporting
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:14:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571D903.7060203@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430829048-22549-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>

I applied these and some other related patches to my hacked-upon 4.0.4, but
I am seeing some inconsistencies between how ath10k and ath9k
reports survey info.  I am using my CT firmware based on 10.1.

ath9k reports ever-increasing counters for the channel time
and busy time.

With ath10k, it reports the same values until I do a scan
again, and even then, it is not additive.

First, should the value only update when we do a scan?

And second, should ath10k report ever increasing totals
to match ath9k behaviour?

Thanks,
Ben

On 05/05/2015 05:30 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> Rx clear count reported in wmi_chan_info_event is actually channel_busy_count
> not rx_frame_count. Send rx_clear_count through time_busy of survey_info
> and set SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY in filled.
> 
> iw wlan0 survey dump
> 
> urvey data from wlan0
>         frequency:                      5180 MHz [in use]
>         noise:                          -103 dBm
>         channel active time:            150 ms
>         channel busy time:              22 ms
> Survey data from wlan0
>         frequency:                      5200 MHz
>         noise:                          -102 dBm
>         channel active time:            146 ms
>         channel busy time:              0 ms
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index ebaa096..0fabe68 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -1645,10 +1645,10 @@ void ath10k_wmi_event_chan_info(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  		survey = &ar->survey[idx];
>  		survey->time = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(cycle_count);
> -		survey->time_rx = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(rx_clear_count);
> +		survey->time_busy = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(rx_clear_count);
>  		survey->noise = noise_floor;
>  		survey->filled = SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
> -				 SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
> +				 SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
>  				 SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM;
>  	}
>  
> 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix survey information reporting
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:14:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571D903.7060203@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430829048-22549-1-git-send-email-vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>

I applied these and some other related patches to my hacked-upon 4.0.4, but
I am seeing some inconsistencies between how ath10k and ath9k
reports survey info.  I am using my CT firmware based on 10.1.

ath9k reports ever-increasing counters for the channel time
and busy time.

With ath10k, it reports the same values until I do a scan
again, and even then, it is not additive.

First, should the value only update when we do a scan?

And second, should ath10k report ever increasing totals
to match ath9k behaviour?

Thanks,
Ben

On 05/05/2015 05:30 AM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> Rx clear count reported in wmi_chan_info_event is actually channel_busy_count
> not rx_frame_count. Send rx_clear_count through time_busy of survey_info
> and set SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY in filled.
> 
> iw wlan0 survey dump
> 
> urvey data from wlan0
>         frequency:                      5180 MHz [in use]
>         noise:                          -103 dBm
>         channel active time:            150 ms
>         channel busy time:              22 ms
> Survey data from wlan0
>         frequency:                      5200 MHz
>         noise:                          -102 dBm
>         channel active time:            146 ms
>         channel busy time:              0 ms
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index ebaa096..0fabe68 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -1645,10 +1645,10 @@ void ath10k_wmi_event_chan_info(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  		survey = &ar->survey[idx];
>  		survey->time = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(cycle_count);
> -		survey->time_rx = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(rx_clear_count);
> +		survey->time_busy = WMI_CHAN_INFO_MSEC(rx_clear_count);
>  		survey->noise = noise_floor;
>  		survey->filled = SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
> -				 SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
> +				 SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
>  				 SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM;
>  	}
>  
> 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05 12:30 [PATCH] ath10k: Fix survey information reporting Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-05-05 12:30 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2015-05-22  8:16 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-22  8:16   ` Kalle Valo
2015-06-05 17:14 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-06-05 17:14   ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 19:10   ` YanBo
2015-06-05 19:10     ` YanBo
2015-06-05 19:22     ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 19:22       ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 20:18       ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 20:18         ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 21:00         ` YanBo
2015-06-05 21:00           ` YanBo
2015-06-05 21:20           ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 21:20             ` Ben Greear
2015-06-05 21:39             ` YanBo
2015-06-05 21:39               ` YanBo
2015-06-05 20:58       ` YanBo
2015-06-05 20:58         ` YanBo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5571D903.7060203@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vthiagar@qti.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.