From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Don't use of_node after putting it
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571F015.9080109@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150605144539.GC7420@arm.com>
On 06/05/2015 07:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 702591f6180a..8af7784a8e35 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -1340,12 +1340,13 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id(dn, cpu, NULL))
>> break;
>>
>> - of_node_put(dn);
>> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>> pr_warn("Failed to find logical CPU for %s\n",
>> dn->name);
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>> break;
>> }
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>>
>> irqs[i] = cpu;
>> }
> Yeah, I agree this needs changing but given (a) the CPU node isn't going
> to disappear and (b) this patch will conflict horribly with my queue for
> 4.2, do you mind if I sit on this until after the merge window (as a fix
> for 4.2)?
>
>
Sure, no problem.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Don't use of_node after putting it
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571F015.9080109@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150605144539.GC7420@arm.com>
On 06/05/2015 07:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 702591f6180a..8af7784a8e35 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -1340,12 +1340,13 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id(dn, cpu, NULL))
>> break;
>>
>> - of_node_put(dn);
>> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
>> pr_warn("Failed to find logical CPU for %s\n",
>> dn->name);
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>> break;
>> }
>> + of_node_put(dn);
>>
>> irqs[i] = cpu;
>> }
> Yeah, I agree this needs changing but given (a) the CPU node isn't going
> to disappear and (b) this patch will conflict horribly with my queue for
> 4.2, do you mind if I sit on this until after the merge window (as a fix
> for 4.2)?
>
>
Sure, no problem.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 20:53 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: perf: Don't use of_node after putting it Stephen Boyd
2015-06-03 20:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: " Stephen Boyd
2015-06-03 20:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-05 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: " Will Deacon
2015-06-05 14:45 ` Will Deacon
2015-06-05 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-06-05 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5571F015.9080109@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.