From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 10:51:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5573B1CA.1050204@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=XGOVpAA5+NQ8O910T=CPrYKfTseBXfNbR4EkenzDECaQ@mail.gmail.com>
在 2015年06月06日 04:55, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Caesar,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + if (!on)
>> + reset_control_assert(rstc);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__);
>> + reset_control_put(rstc);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (on)
>> reset_control_deassert(rstc);
>> - else
>> - reset_control_assert(rstc);
> As Heiko indicated in the previous patchset, he thought it would be
> nice to move the 'pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd)' to before you deasserted
> reset. ...but then I pointed out that you tested that in patch set #2
> and it didn't work.
>
> Talking to Heiko offline he thought that perhaps you could make
> 'pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd)' work if you increased your 'udelay(10);'
> in rockchip_boot_secondary(). Perhaps the old
> 'pmu_power_domain_is_on' was acting like an extra bit of delay and
> that's why moving it broke things.
>
>
> I actually went back and tested patch set #2 and it worked for me, so
> I couldn't test Heiko's theory. Could you go and reproduce the
> problem with patch set #2 again and then try increasing the udelay()
> and see if your problems go away? If that works, it might be a
> slightly better solution. Note that I think Heiko had a slightly
> cleaner version of your patch set #2 that he posted in response to
> your patch set #3.
@@ -150,13 +159,15 @@ static int __cpuinit
rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
* sram_base_addr + 4: 0xdeadbeaf
* sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
* */
- udelay(10);
+ udelay(20);
I increased the 'udelay(20)' or 'udelay(50)' in rockchip_boot_secondary().
Set#2 also can repro this issue over 22600 cycles with testing scripts.
(about 1 hours)
log:
================= 226 ============
[ 4069.134419] CPU1: shutdown
[ 4069.164431] CPU2: shutdown
[ 4069.204475] CPU3: shutdown
......
[ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown
[ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown
[ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown
[ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor
[ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor
[ 4072.587426] CPU3: Booted secondary processor
<hang>
The set #4 will be better work.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
- Caesar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wxt@rock-chips.com (Caesar Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 10:51:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5573B1CA.1050204@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=XGOVpAA5+NQ8O910T=CPrYKfTseBXfNbR4EkenzDECaQ@mail.gmail.com>
? 2015?06?06? 04:55, Doug Anderson ??:
> Caesar,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + if (!on)
>> + reset_control_assert(rstc);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pmu, PMU_PWRDN_CON, BIT(pd), val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("%s: could not update power domain\n", __func__);
>> + reset_control_put(rstc);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (on)
>> reset_control_deassert(rstc);
>> - else
>> - reset_control_assert(rstc);
> As Heiko indicated in the previous patchset, he thought it would be
> nice to move the 'pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd)' to before you deasserted
> reset. ...but then I pointed out that you tested that in patch set #2
> and it didn't work.
>
> Talking to Heiko offline he thought that perhaps you could make
> 'pmu_power_domain_is_on(pd)' work if you increased your 'udelay(10);'
> in rockchip_boot_secondary(). Perhaps the old
> 'pmu_power_domain_is_on' was acting like an extra bit of delay and
> that's why moving it broke things.
>
>
> I actually went back and tested patch set #2 and it worked for me, so
> I couldn't test Heiko's theory. Could you go and reproduce the
> problem with patch set #2 again and then try increasing the udelay()
> and see if your problems go away? If that works, it might be a
> slightly better solution. Note that I think Heiko had a slightly
> cleaner version of your patch set #2 that he posted in response to
> your patch set #3.
@@ -150,13 +159,15 @@ static int __cpuinit
rockchip_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu,
* sram_base_addr + 4: 0xdeadbeaf
* sram_base_addr + 8: start address for pc
* */
- udelay(10);
+ udelay(20);
I increased the 'udelay(20)' or 'udelay(50)' in rockchip_boot_secondary().
Set#2 also can repro this issue over 22600 cycles with testing scripts.
(about 1 hours)
log:
================= 226 ============
[ 4069.134419] CPU1: shutdown
[ 4069.164431] CPU2: shutdown
[ 4069.204475] CPU3: shutdown
......
[ 4072.454453] CPU1: shutdown
[ 4072.504436] CPU2: shutdown
[ 4072.554426] CPU3: shutdown
[ 4072.577827] CPU1: Booted secondary processor
[ 4072.582611] CPU2: Booted secondary processor
[ 4072.587426] CPU3: Booted secondary processor
<hang>
The set #4 will be better work.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
- Caesar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-07 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 17:05 [PATCH v4 0/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 20:55 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-05 20:55 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-07 2:51 ` Caesar Wang [this message]
2015-06-07 2:51 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-07 3:43 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-07 3:43 ` Doug Anderson
[not found] ` <CAD=FV=VswV+MAgYr084VOxQynHrL1fdwnVb4b_W_bHUZgoW4mg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-07 5:51 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-07 5:51 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-07 5:51 ` Caesar Wang
[not found] ` <5573DBDC.2010204-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-07 9:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-07 9:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-07 9:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-05 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: rockchip: ensure CPU to enter WFI/WFE state Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP code style Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:05 ` Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 20:58 ` Doug Anderson
2015-06-05 20:58 ` Doug Anderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-05 17:03 [PATCH v4 0/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the SMP Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: rockchip: fix the CPU soft reset Caesar Wang
2015-06-05 17:03 ` Caesar Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5573B1CA.1050204@rock-chips.com \
--to=wxt@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.