Re: [PATCH] x86/simplefb: simplefb was broken on Oracle and HP system, skip VIDEO_TYPE_EFI

[ethan zhao <ethan.zhao-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On 2015/6/5 17:31, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> (Cc'ing David)
>>
>> On Wed, 27 May, at 04:45:48PM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>>> As descriped in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98721
>>> When kernel 4.0.4 was tested on Oracle and HP system with UEFI mode, no output and
>>> login on console.
>>>
>>> Simplefb was broken on these systems when orig_video_isVGA is VIDEO_TYPE_EFI, so
>>> skip it.
>>>
>>> This patch was tested on Oracle Sun server X5-2 series and HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9
>>> with kernel 4.0.4
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>> Tested-by: Kunlun Lao <kunlun.lao-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>>> index 764a29f..f833502 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sysfb_simplefb.c
>>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ __init bool parse_mode(const struct screen_info *si,
>>>        unsigned int i;
>>>
>>>        type = si->orig_video_isVGA;
>>> -     if (type != VIDEO_TYPE_VLFB && type != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
>>> +     if (type != VIDEO_TYPE_VLFB)
>>>                return false;
>>>
>>>        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(formats); ++i) {
>> This patch makes sense to me, but I'd really like David to fill us in on
>> the rationale for including VIDEO_TYPE_EFI in the simplefb list in first
>> place, and whether he's aware of any platforms that require simplefb for
>> UEFI.
> simplefb works perfectly fine on EFI systems. There is no need to use
> vesafb nor efifb anymore. If simplefb does not work on a platform, we
> should fix it. Hence, I object to this patch. Can you elaborate what
> exactly the problem is? Are you sure you have CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE=y?
  Yes, no CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE set.
>
> If you really want to use efifb instead, please set
> CONFIG_X86_SYSFB=n.

CONFIG_X86_SYSFB=n.
Works.

>   This config option controls whether you want
> firmware framebuffers to be converted to the generic
> simple-framebuffer interface, or whether you want to use the old
> vesa/efi-framebuffer interfaces.
>
> Thanks
> David
  Thanks,
  Ethan