All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michal.simek@xilinx.com (Michal Simek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Central Direct Memory Access Engine driver support
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:39:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5576DE8A.3030704@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433852683.24094.8.camel@x220>

On 06/09/2015 02:24 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:12 +0200, Michal Simek wrote
>> ok. Will check all our drivers we have to get it synchronized but I
>> expect that a lot of drivers have problems there.
> 
> So do I. Cleaning that all up would add a lot of churn. I'm _not_
> volunteering to do that.

Wolfram? You have been pretty successful with fixing owner field.
This looks like similar task.

> 
> What I decided to do was to (try to) comment on each patch that adds
> another license mismatch. The idea being that this might annoy someone
> into suggesting a (mostly) fool proof alternative to MODULE_LICENSE().
> That didn't really work out yet (though Julia's and your response is
> encouraging)
> 
> On the sunny side I note that very few new mismatches get added (at
> least, I tricked myself into believing that).

I expect that they will still come till this is properly reported by any
tool. And fixed everywhere because people just c&p drivers.

Thanks,
Michal

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Kedareswara rao Appana <appana.durga.rao@xilinx.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	<michal.simek@xilinx.com>, <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>,
	<appanad@xilinx.com>, <punnaia@xilinx.com>,
	<dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srikanth Thokala <sthokal@xilinx.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Central Direct Memory Access Engine driver support
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:39:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5576DE8A.3030704@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433852683.24094.8.camel@x220>

On 06/09/2015 02:24 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 14:12 +0200, Michal Simek wrote
>> ok. Will check all our drivers we have to get it synchronized but I
>> expect that a lot of drivers have problems there.
> 
> So do I. Cleaning that all up would add a lot of churn. I'm _not_
> volunteering to do that.

Wolfram? You have been pretty successful with fixing owner field.
This looks like similar task.

> 
> What I decided to do was to (try to) comment on each patch that adds
> another license mismatch. The idea being that this might annoy someone
> into suggesting a (mostly) fool proof alternative to MODULE_LICENSE().
> That didn't really work out yet (though Julia's and your response is
> encouraging)
> 
> On the sunny side I note that very few new mismatches get added (at
> least, I tricked myself into believing that).

I expect that they will still come till this is properly reported by any
tool. And fixed everywhere because people just c&p drivers.

Thanks,
Michal


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 17:07 [PATCH v4 2/2] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Central Direct Memory Access Engine driver support Kedareswara rao Appana
2015-05-21 17:07 ` Kedareswara rao Appana
2015-05-22 10:30 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-22 10:30   ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-08 11:20   ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2015-06-08 11:20     ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2015-06-09  6:03   ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  6:03     ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  6:10     ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09  6:10       ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09  7:09       ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  7:09         ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  8:15         ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09  8:15           ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09 10:05           ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09 10:05             ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09 10:41           ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09 10:41             ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09 11:59             ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09 11:59               ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09 12:12               ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09 12:12                 ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09 12:24                 ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09 12:24                   ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09 12:39                   ` Michal Simek [this message]
2015-06-09 12:39                     ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  7:21     ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09  7:21       ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09  7:27       ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  7:27         ` Michal Simek
2015-06-09  8:08         ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09  8:08           ` Julia Lawall
2015-06-09  8:27           ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-09  8:27             ` Paul Bolle
2015-06-03  6:22 ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
2015-06-03  6:22   ` Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5576DE8A.3030704@xilinx.com \
    --to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.