Re: [GIT PULL] Qgroup rework with other Fujitsu fix.

[Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>]

On 06/09/2015 10:23 AM, adam900710 wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to reply to all.
>
> To Josef,
>
> I am afraid that your conclusion is not right, as in the patch, it will
> only merge delayed refs when they are in same sequence number.
>
> In fact, in the patch, conditions for merge is even more restrict than
> before, it will not allow merging delayed refs for the same extent if
> there are other delayed refs between them.
>

You're right, I missed this bit

+	if (exist->type != ref->type || exist->no_quota != ref->no_quota ||
+	    exist->seq != ref->seq)
+		goto add_tail;

I don't want the merging more strict, I want to merge as much as 
possible, this was the problem with the original qgroup work and that's 
why I reworked all this sequence number crap.  Thanks,

Josef