From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas@baylibre.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Try power off masters in error path of __pm_genpd_poweron()
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:33:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55798031.50205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434023511-4263-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
W dniu 11.06.2015 o 20:51, Ulf Hansson pisze:
> While powering up a genpd, its domain masters are first being powered up.
> In the error path of __pm_genpd_poweron(), we didn't care to try power off
> these domain masters. Let's deal with that to avoid leaving unused PM
> domains powered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 2327613..32dcb80 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,18 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> }
>
> /**
> + * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff().
> + * @genpd: PM domait to power off.
> + *
> + * Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
> + * before.
> + */
> +static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> + queue_work(pm_wq, &genpd->power_off_work);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * __pm_genpd_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
> * @genpd: PM domain to power up.
> *
> @@ -315,8 +327,12 @@ static int __pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> return 0;
>
> err:
> - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node)
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(link,
> + &genpd->slave_links,
> + slave_node) {
> genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
> + genpd_queue_power_off_work(link->master);
It looks sensible to revert work already done however I wonder if this
is necessary for each slave. The first successful call to
pm_genpd_poweroff() will also walk through slave_links and queue the work.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -490,18 +506,6 @@ static bool genpd_abort_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> }
>
> /**
> - * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff().
> - * @genpd: PM domait to power off.
> - *
> - * Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
> - * before.
> - */
> -static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> -{
> - queue_work(pm_wq, &genpd->power_off_work);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * pm_genpd_poweroff - Remove power from a given PM domain.
> * @genpd: PM domain to power down.
> *
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Try power off masters in error path of __pm_genpd_poweron()
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:33:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55798031.50205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434023511-4263-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
W dniu 11.06.2015 o 20:51, Ulf Hansson pisze:
> While powering up a genpd, its domain masters are first being powered up.
> In the error path of __pm_genpd_poweron(), we didn't care to try power off
> these domain masters. Let's deal with that to avoid leaving unused PM
> domains powered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 2327613..32dcb80 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,18 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> }
>
> /**
> + * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff().
> + * @genpd: PM domait to power off.
> + *
> + * Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
> + * before.
> + */
> +static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> + queue_work(pm_wq, &genpd->power_off_work);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * __pm_genpd_poweron - Restore power to a given PM domain and its masters.
> * @genpd: PM domain to power up.
> *
> @@ -315,8 +327,12 @@ static int __pm_genpd_poweron(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> return 0;
>
> err:
> - list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(link, &genpd->slave_links, slave_node)
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(link,
> + &genpd->slave_links,
> + slave_node) {
> genpd_sd_counter_dec(link->master);
> + genpd_queue_power_off_work(link->master);
It looks sensible to revert work already done however I wonder if this
is necessary for each slave. The first successful call to
pm_genpd_poweroff() will also walk through slave_links and queue the work.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -490,18 +506,6 @@ static bool genpd_abort_poweroff(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> }
>
> /**
> - * genpd_queue_power_off_work - Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff().
> - * @genpd: PM domait to power off.
> - *
> - * Queue up the execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() unless it's already been done
> - * before.
> - */
> -static void genpd_queue_power_off_work(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> -{
> - queue_work(pm_wq, &genpd->power_off_work);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * pm_genpd_poweroff - Remove power from a given PM domain.
> * @genpd: PM domain to power down.
> *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 11:51 [PATCH] PM / Domains: Try power off masters in error path of __pm_genpd_poweron() Ulf Hansson
2015-06-11 11:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-06-11 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-06-11 12:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-25 11:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-06-25 11:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-06-26 0:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-26 0:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-16 8:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-07-16 8:51 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55798031.50205@gmail.com \
--to=k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com \
--cc=ahaslam+renesas@baylibre.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.