All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mleitner@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: allow authenticating DATA chunks that are bundled with COOKIE_ECHO
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:24:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557B15B8.6050500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150612112640.GA22204@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

On 06/12/2015 07:26 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: mleitner@redhat.com
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:49:46 -0300
>>
>>> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, we can ask to authenticate DATA chunks and we can send DATA
>>> chunks on the same packet as COOKIE_ECHO, but if you try to combine
>>> both, the DATA chunk will be sent unauthenticated and peer won't accept
>>> it, leading to a communication failure.
>>>
>>> This happens because even though the data was queued after it was
>>> requested to authenticate DATA chunks, it was also queued before we
>>> could know that remote peer can handle authenticating, so
>>> sctp_auth_send_cid() returns false.
>>>
>>> The fix is whenever we set up an active key, re-check send queue for
>>> chunks that now should be authenticated. As a result, such packet will
>>> now contain COOKIE_ECHO + AUTH + DATA chunks, in that order.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Liu Wei <weliu@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>
>> Vlad/Neil, please review.
>>
> 
> sorry Dave, though I had sent email on that already.
> 
> I had an initial concern that there could be a race in which a previous
> iteration of sctp_outq_flush would move some chunks to a packet, but not flush
> it to the network layer yet (due to not being full), and that would result in
> the same condition.  But since this only happens with a COOKIE_ECHO chunk (which
> is a control chunk), we should be ok, as those are sent immediately.

Neil.  I don't think this race can happen since outq manipulation always happens under
a socket lock and so do socket options.  So, we are guaranteed that outq will not change
in this case.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mleitner@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: allow authenticating DATA chunks that are bundled with COOKIE_ECHO
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:24:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557B15B8.6050500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150612112640.GA22204@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

On 06/12/2015 07:26 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: mleitner@redhat.com
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:49:46 -0300
>>
>>> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, we can ask to authenticate DATA chunks and we can send DATA
>>> chunks on the same packet as COOKIE_ECHO, but if you try to combine
>>> both, the DATA chunk will be sent unauthenticated and peer won't accept
>>> it, leading to a communication failure.
>>>
>>> This happens because even though the data was queued after it was
>>> requested to authenticate DATA chunks, it was also queued before we
>>> could know that remote peer can handle authenticating, so
>>> sctp_auth_send_cid() returns false.
>>>
>>> The fix is whenever we set up an active key, re-check send queue for
>>> chunks that now should be authenticated. As a result, such packet will
>>> now contain COOKIE_ECHO + AUTH + DATA chunks, in that order.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Liu Wei <weliu@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>
>> Vlad/Neil, please review.
>>
> 
> sorry Dave, though I had sent email on that already.
> 
> I had an initial concern that there could be a race in which a previous
> iteration of sctp_outq_flush would move some chunks to a packet, but not flush
> it to the network layer yet (due to not being full), and that would result in
> the same condition.  But since this only happens with a COOKIE_ECHO chunk (which
> is a control chunk), we should be ok, as those are sent immediately.

Neil.  I don't think this race can happen since outq manipulation always happens under
a socket lock and so do socket options.  So, we are guaranteed that outq will not change
in this case.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-12 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 17:49 [PATCH] sctp: allow authenticating DATA chunks that are bundled with COOKIE_ECHO mleitner
2015-06-11 17:49 ` mleitner
2015-06-12  0:27 ` David Miller
2015-06-12  0:27   ` David Miller
2015-06-12 11:26   ` Neil Horman
2015-06-12 11:26     ` Neil Horman
2015-06-12 17:24     ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-06-12 17:24       ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-06-12 21:18 ` David Miller
2015-06-12 21:18   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557B15B8.6050500@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.