All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"tim@xen.org" <tim@xen.org>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"wei.liu2@citrix.com" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	"Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	"stefano.stabellini@citrix.com" <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [v3][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:29:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <557FEC6A.1080003@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D12628FF32@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 2015/6/16 13:47, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Chen, Tiejun
>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:54 PM
>>>
>>>>            bar_data |= (uint32_t)base;
>>>>            bar_data_upper = (uint32_t)(base >> 32);
>>>> +        for ( j = 0; j < memory_map.nr_map ; j++ )
>>>> +        {
>>>> +            if ( memory_map.map[j].type != E820_RAM )
>>>> +            {
>>>> +                reserved_end = memory_map.map[j].addr +
>>>> memory_map.map[j].size;
>>>> +                if ( check_overlap(base, bar_sz,
>>>> +                                   memory_map.map[j].addr,
>>>> +                                   memory_map.map[j].size) )
>>>> +                {
>>>> +                    base = (reserved_end  + bar_sz - 1) & ~(uint64_t)(bar_sz - 1);
>>>> +                    goto reallocate_mmio;
>>
>> That is because our previous implementation is just skipping that
>> conflict region,
>>
>> "But you do nothing to make sure the MMIO regions all fit in the
>> available window (see the code ahead of this relocating RAM if
>> necessary)." and "...it simply skips assigning resources. Your changes
>> potentially growing the space needed to fit all MMIO BARs therefore also
>> needs to adjust the up front calculation, such that if necessary more
>> RAM can be relocated to make the hole large enough."
>>
>> And then I replied as follows,
>>
>> "You're right.
>>
>> Just think about we're always trying to check pci_mem_start to populate
>> more RAM to obtain enough PCI mempry,
>>
>>       /* Relocate RAM that overlaps PCI space (in 64k-page chunks). */
>>       while ( (pci_mem_start >> PAGE_SHIFT) < hvm_info->low_mem_pgend )
>>       {
>>           struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
>>           unsigned int nr_pages = min_t(
>>               unsigned int,
>>               hvm_info->low_mem_pgend - (pci_mem_start >> PAGE_SHIFT),
>>               (1u << 16) - 1);
>>           if ( hvm_info->high_mem_pgend == 0 )
>>               hvm_info->high_mem_pgend = 1ull << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT);
>>           hvm_info->low_mem_pgend -= nr_pages;
>>           printf("Relocating 0x%x pages from "PRIllx" to "PRIllx\
>>                  " for lowmem MMIO hole\n",
>>                  nr_pages,
>>                  PRIllx_arg(((uint64_t)hvm_info->low_mem_pgend)<<PAGE_SHIFT),
>>
>> PRIllx_arg(((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend)<<PAGE_SHIFT));
>>           xatp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>>           xatp.space = XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range;
>>           xatp.idx   = hvm_info->low_mem_pgend;
>>           xatp.gpfn  = hvm_info->high_mem_pgend;
>>           xatp.size  = nr_pages;
>>           if ( hypercall_memory_op(XENMEM_add_to_physmap, &xatp) != 0 )
>>               BUG();
>>           hvm_info->high_mem_pgend += nr_pages;
>>       }
>> "
>>
>> I hope this can help you understand this background. And I will update
>> that code comment like this,
>>
>>       /*
>>        * We'll skip all space overlapping with reserved memory later,
>>        * so we need to decrease pci_mem_start to populate more RAM
>>        * to compensate them.
>>        */
>>
>
> Jan's comment is correct. However I don't think adjusting pci_mem_start
> is the right way here (even now I don't quite understand how it's adjusted
> in your earlier code). There are other limitations on that value. We can simply
> adjust mmio_total to include conflicting reserved ranges, so more bars will

Agreed.

I'm trying to walk into this direction:

     /*
      * We'll skip all space overlapping with reserved memory later,
      * so we need to increase mmio_total to compensate them.
      */
     for ( j = 0; j < memory_map.nr_map ; j++ )
     {
         uint64_t conflict_size = 0;
         if ( memory_map.map[j].type != E820_RAM )
         {
             reserved_start = memory_map.map[j].addr;
             reserved_size = memory_map.map[j].size;
             reserved_end = reserved_start + reserved_size;
             if ( check_overlap(pci_mem_start, pci_mem_end - pci_mem_start,
                                reserved_start, reserved_size) )
             {
                 /*
                  * Calculate how much mmio range conflict with
                  * reserved device memory.
                  */
                 conflict_size += reserved_size;

                 /*
                  * But we may need to subtract those sizes beyond the
                  * pci memory, [pci_mem_start, pci_mem_end].
                  */
                 if ( reserved_start < pci_mem_start )
                     conflict_size -= (pci_mem_start - reserved_start);
                 if ( reserved_end > pci_mem_end )
                     conflict_size -= (reserved_end - pci_mem_end);
             }
         }

         if ( conflict_size )
         {
             uint64_t conflict_size = max_t(
                     uint64_t, conflict_size, max_bar_sz);
             conflict_size &= ~(conflict_size - 1);
             mmio_total += conflict_size;
         }
     }


Note max_bar_sz just represents the most biggest bar size among all pci 
devices.

Thanks
Tiejun

> be moved to high_mem_resource automatically by below code:
>
>   380         using_64bar = bars[i].is_64bar && bar64_relocate
>   381             && (mmio_total > (mem_resource.max - mem_resource.base));
>   382         bar_data = pci_readl(devfn, bar_reg);
>   383
>   384         if ( (bar_data & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) ==
>   385              PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY )
>   386         {
>   387             /* Mapping high memory if PCI device is 64 bits bar */
>   388             if ( using_64bar ) {
>   389                 if ( high_mem_resource.base & (bar_sz - 1) )
>   390                     high_mem_resource.base = high_mem_resource.base -
>   391                         (high_mem_resource.base & (bar_sz - 1)) + bar_sz;
>   392                 if ( !pci_hi_mem_start )
>   393                     pci_hi_mem_start = high_mem_resource.base;
>   394                 resource = &high_mem_resource;
>   395                 bar_data &= ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>   396             }
>   397             else {
>   398                 resource = &mem_resource;
>   399                 bar_data &= ~PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>   400             }
>   401             mmio_total -= bar_sz;
>   402         }
>
> Thanks
> Kevin
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-16  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11  1:15 [v3][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  8:56   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 02/16] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  7:33   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-11  8:23     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  9:23       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-11  9:25         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  9:00   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  9:18     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 03/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:14   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  9:31     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11 14:07       ` Tim Deegan
2015-06-12  2:43         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12  5:58           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12  5:59             ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  6:13               ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-18 10:07                 ` Tim Deegan
2015-06-19  0:37                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17 10:03   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  6:23     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 04/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:28   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  6:31     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12  8:45       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-12  9:20         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12  9:26           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-15  7:39           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-16  2:30       ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-17 10:11   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  7:14     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-18  7:53       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  8:48         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-18  9:13           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  9:31             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 05/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:29   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-17 10:14   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  8:53     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:38   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  7:33     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17 10:22   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  9:13     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:51   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  7:53     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-16  5:47       ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-16  9:29         ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-06-16  9:40           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-17  7:10             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17  7:19               ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-17  7:54                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17  8:05                   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-17  8:26                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17  8:47                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17  9:02                       ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-17  9:18                         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17  9:24                           ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  6:17                             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-18  6:29                               ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  7:01                                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-18  8:05                                   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-19  2:02                                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-23  9:46                                       ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 08/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11  9:59   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  8:19     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-16  5:54       ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 09/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11 10:00   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 10/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11 10:02   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  8:25     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-16  2:28       ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12 15:43   ` Wei Liu
2015-06-15  1:12     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-15 14:58       ` Wei Liu
2015-06-16  2:31         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 11/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-06-12 16:02   ` Wei Liu
2015-06-15  1:19     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 12/16] tools/libxl: passes rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-06-12 16:17   ` Wei Liu
2015-06-15  1:26     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-15 15:00       ` Wei Liu
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 13/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11 10:19   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  8:30     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12 16:39   ` Wei Liu
2015-06-15  1:50     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-15 15:01       ` Wei Liu
2015-06-16  1:44         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 14/16] tools/libxl: extend XENMEM_set_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-06-12 16:43   ` Wei Liu
2015-06-15  2:15     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11 10:22   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  8:59     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-16  5:58       ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-16  6:09         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  1:15 ` [v3][PATCH 16/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-06-11 10:25   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-12  8:44     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-17 10:28   ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-18  9:23     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11  7:27 ` [v3][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Jan Beulich
2015-06-11  8:42   ` Tian, Kevin
2015-06-11  9:06     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-11 12:52 ` Tim Deegan
2015-06-12  2:10   ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-06-12  8:04     ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-12  8:20       ` Chen, Tiejun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=557FEC6A.1080003@intel.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.