From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Andre Przywara" <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:39:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55816A8B.3070803@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55815FA5.4010203@linaro.org>
On 17/06/15 12:53, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 07:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Now that struct vgic_lr supports the LR_HW bit and carries a hwirq
>> field, we can encode that information into the list registers.
>>
>> This patch provides implementations for both GICv2 and GICv3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 3 +++
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 3 ++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> index ffbc034..cf637d6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> @@ -268,9 +268,12 @@
>>
>> #define ICH_LR_EOI (1UL << 41)
>> #define ICH_LR_GROUP (1UL << 60)
>> +#define ICH_LR_HW (1UL << 61)
>> #define ICH_LR_STATE (3UL << 62)
>> #define ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT (1UL << 62)
>> #define ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT (1UL << 63)
>> +#define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT 32
>> +#define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_MASK (0x3ffUL << ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT)
>>
>> #define ICH_MISR_EOI (1 << 0)
>> #define ICH_MISR_U (1 << 1)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> index 9de976b..ca88dad 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> @@ -71,11 +71,12 @@
>>
>> #define GICH_LR_VIRTUALID (0x3ff << 0)
>> #define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT (10)
>> -#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID (7 << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID (0x3ff << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>> #define GICH_LR_STATE (3 << 28)
>> #define GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT (1 << 28)
>> #define GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT (1 << 29)
>> #define GICH_LR_EOI (1 << 19)
>> +#define GICH_LR_HW (1 << 31)
>>
>> #define GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT 0
>> #define GICH_VMCR_CTRL_MASK (0x21f << GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT)
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> index f9b9c7c..8d7b04d 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ static struct vgic_lr vgic_v2_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> lr_desc.state |= LR_STATE_ACTIVE;
>> if (val & GICH_LR_EOI)
>> lr_desc.state |= LR_EOI_INT;
>> + if (val & GICH_LR_HW) {
>> + lr_desc.state |= LR_HW;
>> + lr_desc.hwirq = (val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>> + }
>>
>> return lr_desc;
>> }
>> @@ -55,7 +59,9 @@ static struct vgic_lr vgic_v2_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
>> struct vgic_lr lr_desc)
>> {
>> - u32 lr_val = (lr_desc.source << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) | lr_desc.irq;
>> + u32 lr_val;
>> +
>> + lr_val = lr_desc.irq;
>>
>> if (lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_PENDING)
>> lr_val |= GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
>> @@ -64,6 +70,14 @@ static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
>> if (lr_desc.state & LR_EOI_INT)
>> lr_val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
>>
>> + if (lr_desc.state & LR_HW) {
>> + lr_val |= GICH_LR_HW;
>> + lr_val |= (u32)lr_desc.hwirq << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>
> shouldn't we test somewhere that the hwirq is between 16 and 1019. Else
> behavior is unpredictable according to v2 spec. when queuing into the LR
> we currently check the linux irq vlr.irq >= VGIC_NR_SGIS if I am not wrong.
This is actually implicit. vgic_map_phys_irq() takes a parameter (irq)
that is the Linux view of the hwirq we're dealing with (we fetch this
hwirq by traversing the irq_data list associated with irq).
SGIs are not part of the set of interrupts that can be mapped to a Linux
irq (their usage is completely private to the two GIC drivers).
Note that GICv3 allows SGIs to be set as a physical interrupt in an LR
though, but this is not a feature we use so far.
> besides Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
Thanks!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:39:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55816A8B.3070803@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55815FA5.4010203@linaro.org>
On 17/06/15 12:53, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 07:03 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Now that struct vgic_lr supports the LR_HW bit and carries a hwirq
>> field, we can encode that information into the list registers.
>>
>> This patch provides implementations for both GICv2 and GICv3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 3 +++
>> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 3 ++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> index ffbc034..cf637d6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> @@ -268,9 +268,12 @@
>>
>> #define ICH_LR_EOI (1UL << 41)
>> #define ICH_LR_GROUP (1UL << 60)
>> +#define ICH_LR_HW (1UL << 61)
>> #define ICH_LR_STATE (3UL << 62)
>> #define ICH_LR_PENDING_BIT (1UL << 62)
>> #define ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT (1UL << 63)
>> +#define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT 32
>> +#define ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_MASK (0x3ffUL << ICH_LR_PHYS_ID_SHIFT)
>>
>> #define ICH_MISR_EOI (1 << 0)
>> #define ICH_MISR_U (1 << 1)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> index 9de976b..ca88dad 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
>> @@ -71,11 +71,12 @@
>>
>> #define GICH_LR_VIRTUALID (0x3ff << 0)
>> #define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT (10)
>> -#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID (7 << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>> +#define GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID (0x3ff << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>> #define GICH_LR_STATE (3 << 28)
>> #define GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT (1 << 28)
>> #define GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT (1 << 29)
>> #define GICH_LR_EOI (1 << 19)
>> +#define GICH_LR_HW (1 << 31)
>>
>> #define GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT 0
>> #define GICH_VMCR_CTRL_MASK (0x21f << GICH_VMCR_CTRL_SHIFT)
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> index f9b9c7c..8d7b04d 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ static struct vgic_lr vgic_v2_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> lr_desc.state |= LR_STATE_ACTIVE;
>> if (val & GICH_LR_EOI)
>> lr_desc.state |= LR_EOI_INT;
>> + if (val & GICH_LR_HW) {
>> + lr_desc.state |= LR_HW;
>> + lr_desc.hwirq = (val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>> + }
>>
>> return lr_desc;
>> }
>> @@ -55,7 +59,9 @@ static struct vgic_lr vgic_v2_get_lr(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
>> static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
>> struct vgic_lr lr_desc)
>> {
>> - u32 lr_val = (lr_desc.source << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) | lr_desc.irq;
>> + u32 lr_val;
>> +
>> + lr_val = lr_desc.irq;
>>
>> if (lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_PENDING)
>> lr_val |= GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT;
>> @@ -64,6 +70,14 @@ static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
>> if (lr_desc.state & LR_EOI_INT)
>> lr_val |= GICH_LR_EOI;
>>
>> + if (lr_desc.state & LR_HW) {
>> + lr_val |= GICH_LR_HW;
>> + lr_val |= (u32)lr_desc.hwirq << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>
> shouldn't we test somewhere that the hwirq is between 16 and 1019. Else
> behavior is unpredictable according to v2 spec. when queuing into the LR
> we currently check the linux irq vlr.irq >= VGIC_NR_SGIS if I am not wrong.
This is actually implicit. vgic_map_phys_irq() takes a parameter (irq)
that is the Linux view of the hwirq we're dealing with (we fetch this
hwirq by traversing the irq_data list associated with irq).
SGIs are not part of the set of interrupts that can be mapped to a Linux
irq (their usage is completely private to the two GIC drivers).
Note that GICv3 allows SGIs to be set as a physical interrupt in an LR
though, but this is not a feature we use so far.
> besides Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
Thanks!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 17:03 [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Fix ordering of timer/GIC on guest entry Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 11:29 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Move vgic handling to a non-preemptible section Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 11:38 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 11:38 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Convert struct vgic_lr to use bitfields Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:12 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 13:12 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-10 17:23 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-10 17:23 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-10 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 18:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 13:21 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 13:21 ` Alex Bennée
2015-06-09 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-09 14:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 11:53 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:53 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:39 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-06-17 12:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 13:21 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-17 13:21 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-17 13:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 13:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Relax vgic_can_sample_irq for edge IRQs Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 9:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 9:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 11:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-02 16:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-02 16:23 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-03 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-03 9:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-07-03 9:57 ` Peter Maydell
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:43 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:43 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 15:44 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 15:44 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-16 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16 8:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-16 9:10 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-16 9:10 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 11:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 11:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW interrupts to be queued to a guest Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 8:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 8:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 9:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 9:44 ` Andre Przywara
2015-06-11 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-11 10:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-15 16:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-15 16:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 11:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 12:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 12:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get,set}_phys_irq_active Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get, set}_phys_irq_active Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get,set}_phys_irq_active Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add vgic_{get, set}_phys_irq_active Eric Auger
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm/arm64: timer: Allow the timer to control the active state Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow non-shared device HW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2015-06-08 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:11 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-17 15:50 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-17 15:50 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 8:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-18 8:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-18 17:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 17:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-30 20:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-01 8:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-01 8:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-06-10 8:33 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm/arm64: KVM: Active interrupt state switching for shared devices Eric Auger
2015-06-10 8:33 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-10 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-06-10 11:13 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-10 11:13 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 6:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-06-18 6:51 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55816A8B.3070803@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.