All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: protect tt_local_entry from concurrent delete events
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:24:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581911D.1020604@meshcoding.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558169C5.7050700@meshcoding.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]



On 17/06/15 14:36, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On 17/06/15 14:09, Marek Lindner wrote:
>> The tt_local_entry deletion performed batadv_tt_local_remove() was neither
>> protecting against simultaneous deletes nor checking whether the element
>> was still part of the list before calling hlist_del_rcu().
>>
>> Replacing the hlist_del_rcu() with batadv_hash_remove() provides adequate
>> protection via hash spinlocks as well as a is-element-still-in-hash check.
>>
>> Reported-by: alfonsname@web.de
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
> 
> Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
> 

I was just going through your other TT patch and I realized that if the
element can't be find in the list (because it was already removed) we
should skip the batadv_softif_vlan_free_ref() below because the
reference has already been decreased by whom already removed the TT entry.


Cheers,

-- 
Antonio Quartulli


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-17 12:09 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: protect tt_local_entry from concurrent delete events Marek Lindner
2015-06-17 12:36 ` Antonio Quartulli
2015-06-17 15:24   ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5581911D.1020604@meshcoding.com \
    --to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    --cc=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.