All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	joro@8bytes.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>,
	Joe Donohue <jdonohue@redhat.com>,
	Duncan Poole <dpoole@nvidia.com>,
	Sherry Cheung <SCheung@nvidia.com>,
	Subhash Gutti <sgutti@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>,
	Lucien Dunning <ldunning@nvidia.com>,
	Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@nvidia.com>,
	Arvind Gopalakrishnan <arvindg@nvidia.com>,
	Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>, Roland Dreier <roland@p>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/36] IB/odp/hmm: add core infiniband structure and helper for ODP with HMM.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:59:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558AB7DC.20703@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432239792-5002-14-git-send-email-jglisse@redhat.com>

On 21/05/2015 23:23, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> +int ib_umem_odp_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, struct ib_umem *umem)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(current);
> +	struct ib_device *ib_device = context->device;
> +	struct ib_mirror *ib_mirror;
> +	struct pid *our_pid;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!mm || !ib_device->hmm_ready)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* FIXME can this really happen ? */
No, following Yann Droneaud's patch 8abaae62f3fd ("IB/core: disallow
registering 0-sized memory region") ib_umem_get() checks against zero
sized umems.

> +	if (unlikely(ib_umem_start(umem) == ib_umem_end(umem)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Prevent creating ODP MRs in child processes */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	our_pid = get_task_pid(current->group_leader, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	put_pid(our_pid);
> +	if (context->tgid != our_pid) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	umem->hugetlb = 0;
> +	umem->odp_data = kmalloc(sizeof(*umem->odp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (umem->odp_data == NULL) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	umem->odp_data->private = NULL;
> +	umem->odp_data->umem = umem;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	/* Is there an existing mirror for this process mm ? */
> +	ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(context->ib_mirror);
> +	if (!ib_mirror)
> +		list_for_each_entry(ib_mirror, &ib_device->ib_mirrors, list) {
> +			if (ib_mirror->base.hmm->mm != mm)
> +				continue;
> +			ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +	if (ib_mirror == NULL ||
> +	    ib_mirror == list_first_entry(&ib_device->ib_mirrors,
> +					  struct ib_mirror, list)) {
Is the second check an attempt to check if the list_for_each_entry above
passed through all the entries and didn't break? Maybe I missing
something, but I think that would cause the ib_mirror to hold a pointer
such that ib_mirror->list == ib_mirrors (point to the list head), and
not to the first entry.

In any case, I think it would be more clear if you add another ib_mirror
variable for iterating the ib_mirrors list.

> +		/* We need to create a new mirror. */
> +		ib_mirror = kmalloc(sizeof(*ib_mirror), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (ib_mirror == NULL) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		kref_init(&ib_mirror->kref);
> +		init_rwsem(&ib_mirror->hmm_mr_rwsem);
> +		ib_mirror->umem_tree = RB_ROOT;
> +		ib_mirror->ib_device = ib_device;
> +
> +		ib_mirror->base.device = &ib_device->hmm_dev;
> +		ret = hmm_mirror_register(&ib_mirror->base);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			kfree(ib_mirror);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_add(&ib_mirror->list, &ib_device->ib_mirrors);
> +		context->ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	umem->odp_data.ib_mirror = ib_mirror;
> +
> +	down_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +	rbt_ib_umem_insert(&umem->odp_data->interval_tree, &mirror->umem_tree);
> +	up_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +
> +	mmput(mm);
> +	return 0;
> +}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
To: jglisse@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	joro@8bytes.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>,
	Joe Donohue <jdonohue@redhat.com>,
	Duncan Poole <dpoole@nvidia.com>,
	Sherry Cheung <SCheung@nvidia.com>,
	Subhash Gutti <sgutti@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>,
	Lucien Dunning <ldunning@nvidia.com>,
	Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@nvidia.com>,
	Arvind Gopalakrishnan <arvindg@nvidia.com>,
	Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
	Ben Sander <ben.sander@amd.com>,
	Greg Stoner <Greg.Stoner@amd.com>,
	John Bridgman <John.Bridgman@amd.com>,
	Michael Mantor <Michael.Mantor@amd.com>,
	Paul Blinzer <Paul.Blinzer@amd.com>,
	Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>,
	Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	Oded Gabbay <Oded.Gabbay@amd.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/36] IB/odp/hmm: add core infiniband structure and helper for ODP with HMM.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:59:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558AB7DC.20703@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432239792-5002-14-git-send-email-jglisse@redhat.com>

On 21/05/2015 23:23, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> +int ib_umem_odp_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, struct ib_umem *umem)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(current);
> +	struct ib_device *ib_device = context->device;
> +	struct ib_mirror *ib_mirror;
> +	struct pid *our_pid;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!mm || !ib_device->hmm_ready)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* FIXME can this really happen ? */
No, following Yann Droneaud's patch 8abaae62f3fd ("IB/core: disallow
registering 0-sized memory region") ib_umem_get() checks against zero
sized umems.

> +	if (unlikely(ib_umem_start(umem) == ib_umem_end(umem)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Prevent creating ODP MRs in child processes */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	our_pid = get_task_pid(current->group_leader, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	put_pid(our_pid);
> +	if (context->tgid != our_pid) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	umem->hugetlb = 0;
> +	umem->odp_data = kmalloc(sizeof(*umem->odp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (umem->odp_data == NULL) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	umem->odp_data->private = NULL;
> +	umem->odp_data->umem = umem;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	/* Is there an existing mirror for this process mm ? */
> +	ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(context->ib_mirror);
> +	if (!ib_mirror)
> +		list_for_each_entry(ib_mirror, &ib_device->ib_mirrors, list) {
> +			if (ib_mirror->base.hmm->mm != mm)
> +				continue;
> +			ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +	if (ib_mirror == NULL ||
> +	    ib_mirror == list_first_entry(&ib_device->ib_mirrors,
> +					  struct ib_mirror, list)) {
Is the second check an attempt to check if the list_for_each_entry above
passed through all the entries and didn't break? Maybe I missing
something, but I think that would cause the ib_mirror to hold a pointer
such that ib_mirror->list == ib_mirrors (point to the list head), and
not to the first entry.

In any case, I think it would be more clear if you add another ib_mirror
variable for iterating the ib_mirrors list.

> +		/* We need to create a new mirror. */
> +		ib_mirror = kmalloc(sizeof(*ib_mirror), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (ib_mirror == NULL) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		kref_init(&ib_mirror->kref);
> +		init_rwsem(&ib_mirror->hmm_mr_rwsem);
> +		ib_mirror->umem_tree = RB_ROOT;
> +		ib_mirror->ib_device = ib_device;
> +
> +		ib_mirror->base.device = &ib_device->hmm_dev;
> +		ret = hmm_mirror_register(&ib_mirror->base);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			kfree(ib_mirror);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_add(&ib_mirror->list, &ib_device->ib_mirrors);
> +		context->ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	umem->odp_data.ib_mirror = ib_mirror;
> +
> +	down_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +	rbt_ib_umem_insert(&umem->odp_data->interval_tree, &mirror->umem_tree);
> +	up_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +
> +	mmput(mm);
> +	return 0;
> +}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
To: <jglisse@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Brendan Conoboy <blc@redhat.com>,
	Joe Donohue <jdonohue@redhat.com>,
	Duncan Poole <dpoole@nvidia.com>,
	Sherry Cheung <SCheung@nvidia.com>,
	Subhash Gutti <sgutti@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@nvidia.com>,
	Lucien Dunning <ldunning@nvidia.com>,
	"Cameron Buschardt" <cabuschardt@nvidia.com>,
	Arvind Gopalakrishnan <arvindg@nvidia.com>,
	Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
	Ben Sander <ben.sander@amd.com>,
	Greg Stoner <Greg.Stoner@amd.com>,
	John Bridgman <John.Bridgman@amd.com>,
	Michael Mantor <Michael.Mantor@amd.com>,
	"Paul Blinzer" <Paul.Blinzer@amd.com>,
	Laurent Morichetti <Laurent.Morichetti@amd.com>,
	Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	Oded Gabbay <Oded.Gabbay@amd.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/36] IB/odp/hmm: add core infiniband structure and helper for ODP with HMM.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:59:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558AB7DC.20703@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432239792-5002-14-git-send-email-jglisse@redhat.com>

On 21/05/2015 23:23, jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> +int ib_umem_odp_get(struct ib_ucontext *context, struct ib_umem *umem)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(current);
> +	struct ib_device *ib_device = context->device;
> +	struct ib_mirror *ib_mirror;
> +	struct pid *our_pid;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!mm || !ib_device->hmm_ready)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* FIXME can this really happen ? */
No, following Yann Droneaud's patch 8abaae62f3fd ("IB/core: disallow
registering 0-sized memory region") ib_umem_get() checks against zero
sized umems.

> +	if (unlikely(ib_umem_start(umem) == ib_umem_end(umem)))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Prevent creating ODP MRs in child processes */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	our_pid = get_task_pid(current->group_leader, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	put_pid(our_pid);
> +	if (context->tgid != our_pid) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	umem->hugetlb = 0;
> +	umem->odp_data = kmalloc(sizeof(*umem->odp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (umem->odp_data == NULL) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	umem->odp_data->private = NULL;
> +	umem->odp_data->umem = umem;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	/* Is there an existing mirror for this process mm ? */
> +	ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(context->ib_mirror);
> +	if (!ib_mirror)
> +		list_for_each_entry(ib_mirror, &ib_device->ib_mirrors, list) {
> +			if (ib_mirror->base.hmm->mm != mm)
> +				continue;
> +			ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +	if (ib_mirror == NULL ||
> +	    ib_mirror == list_first_entry(&ib_device->ib_mirrors,
> +					  struct ib_mirror, list)) {
Is the second check an attempt to check if the list_for_each_entry above
passed through all the entries and didn't break? Maybe I missing
something, but I think that would cause the ib_mirror to hold a pointer
such that ib_mirror->list == ib_mirrors (point to the list head), and
not to the first entry.

In any case, I think it would be more clear if you add another ib_mirror
variable for iterating the ib_mirrors list.

> +		/* We need to create a new mirror. */
> +		ib_mirror = kmalloc(sizeof(*ib_mirror), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (ib_mirror == NULL) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +		kref_init(&ib_mirror->kref);
> +		init_rwsem(&ib_mirror->hmm_mr_rwsem);
> +		ib_mirror->umem_tree = RB_ROOT;
> +		ib_mirror->ib_device = ib_device;
> +
> +		ib_mirror->base.device = &ib_device->hmm_dev;
> +		ret = hmm_mirror_register(&ib_mirror->base);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +			kfree(ib_mirror);
> +			mmput(mm);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		list_add(&ib_mirror->list, &ib_device->ib_mirrors);
> +		context->ib_mirror = ib_mirror_ref(ib_mirror);
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&ib_device->hmm_mutex);
> +	umem->odp_data.ib_mirror = ib_mirror;
> +
> +	down_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +	rbt_ib_umem_insert(&umem->odp_data->interval_tree, &mirror->umem_tree);
> +	up_write(&ib_mirror->umem_rwsem);
> +
> +	mmput(mm);
> +	return 0;
> +}


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 183+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 19:31 HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v8 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/36] mmu_notifier: add event information to address invalidation v7 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-30  3:43   ` John Hubbard
2015-05-30  3:43     ` John Hubbard
2015-06-01 19:03     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-01 19:03       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-01 23:10       ` John Hubbard
2015-06-01 23:10         ` John Hubbard
2015-06-03 16:07         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-03 16:07           ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-03 23:02           ` John Hubbard
2015-06-03 23:02             ` John Hubbard
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/36] mmu_notifier: keep track of active invalidation ranges v3 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-27  5:09   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27  5:09     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27 14:32     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-27 14:32       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-02  9:32   ` John Hubbard
2015-06-02  9:32     ` John Hubbard
2015-06-03 17:15     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-03 17:15       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-05  3:29       ` John Hubbard
2015-06-05  3:29         ` John Hubbard
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/36] mmu_notifier: pass page pointer to mmu_notifier_invalidate_page() j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-27  5:17   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27  5:17     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27 14:33     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-27 14:33       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-03  4:25   ` John Hubbard
2015-06-03  4:25     ` John Hubbard
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/36] mmu_notifier: allow range invalidation to exclude a specific mmu_notifier j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/36] HMM: introduce heterogeneous memory management v3 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-27  5:50   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27  5:50     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27  5:50     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2015-05-27 14:38     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-27 14:38       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-27 14:38       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-08 19:40   ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-08 19:40     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-08 19:40     ` Mark Hairgrove
     [not found]     ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1506081222270.27796-ptWJzH4JGIzJt4XymMeBgkn48jw8i0AO@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-08 21:17       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-08 21:17         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-08 21:17         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-09  1:54         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-09  1:54           ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-09  1:54           ` Mark Hairgrove
     [not found]           ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1506081841490.1802-ptWJzH4JGIzJt4XymMeBgkn48jw8i0AO@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-09 15:56             ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-09 15:56               ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-09 15:56               ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-10  3:33               ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-10  3:33                 ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-10  3:33                 ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-10 15:42                 ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-10 15:42                   ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-10 15:42                   ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-11  1:15                   ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-11  1:15                     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-11  1:15                     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-11 14:23                     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-11 14:23                       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-11 14:23                       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-11 22:26                       ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-11 22:26                         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-11 22:26                         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-15 14:32                         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-15 14:32                           ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-15 14:32                           ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/36] HMM: add HMM page table v2 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-06-19  2:06   ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-19  2:06     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-19 18:07     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-19 18:07       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-20  2:34       ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-20  2:34         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-25 22:57   ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-25 22:57     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-26 16:30     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-26 16:30       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-27  1:34       ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-27  1:34         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-29 14:43         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-29 14:43           ` Jerome Glisse
2015-07-01  2:51           ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-07-01  2:51             ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-07-01 15:07             ` Jerome Glisse
2015-07-01 15:07               ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/36] HMM: add per mirror page table v3 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-06-25 23:05   ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-25 23:05     ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-26 16:43     ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-26 16:43       ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-27  3:02       ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-27  3:02         ` Mark Hairgrove
2015-06-29 14:50         ` Jerome Glisse
2015-06-29 14:50           ` Jerome Glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/36] HMM: add device page fault support v3 j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/36] HMM: add mm page table iterator helpers j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/36] HMM: use CPU page table during invalidation j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/36] HMM: add discard range helper (to clear and free resources for a range) j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 12/36] HMM: add dirty range helper (to toggle dirty bit inside mirror page table) j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/36] HMM: DMA map memory on behalf of device driver j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/36] fork: pass the dst vma to copy_page_range() and its sub-functions j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/36] memcg: export get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/36] HMM: add special swap filetype for memory migrated to HMM device memory j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-06-24  7:49   ` Haggai Eran
2015-06-24  7:49     ` Haggai Eran
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/36] HMM: add new HMM page table flag (valid device memory) j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/36] HMM: add new HMM page table flag (select flag) j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/36] HMM: handle HMM device page table entry on mirror page table fault and update j.glisse
2015-05-21 19:31   ` j.glisse
2015-05-21 20:22 ` [PATCH 20/36] HMM: mm add helper to update page table when migrating memory back jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22   ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22   ` [PATCH 21/36] HMM: mm add helper to update page table when migrating memory jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22   ` [PATCH 22/36] HMM: add new callback for copying memory from and to device memory jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22   ` [PATCH 23/36] HMM: allow to get pointer to spinlock protecting a directory jglisse
2015-05-21 20:22     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 24/36] HMM: split DMA mapping function in two jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 25/36] HMM: add helpers for migration back to system memory jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 26/36] HMM: fork copy migrated memory into system memory for child process jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 27/36] HMM: CPU page fault on migrated memory jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 28/36] HMM: add mirror fault support for system to device memory migration jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 29/36] IB/mlx5: add a new paramter to __mlx_ib_populated_pas for ODP with HMM jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 30/36] IB/mlx5: add a new paramter to mlx5_ib_update_mtt() " jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 31/36] IB/odp: export rbt_ib_umem_for_each_in_range() jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 32/36] IB/odp/hmm: add new kernel option to use HMM for ODP jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 33/36] IB/odp/hmm: add core infiniband structure and helper for ODP with HMM jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-06-24 13:59     ` Haggai Eran [this message]
2015-06-24 13:59       ` Haggai Eran
2015-06-24 13:59       ` Haggai Eran
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 34/36] IB/mlx5/hmm: add mlx5 HMM device initialization and callback jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 35/36] IB/mlx5/hmm: add page fault support for ODP on HMM jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23   ` [PATCH 36/36] IB/mlx5/hmm: enable ODP using HMM jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-21 20:23     ` jglisse
2015-05-30  3:01 ` HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v8 John Hubbard
2015-05-30  3:01   ` John Hubbard
2015-05-30  3:01   ` John Hubbard
2015-05-31  6:56 ` Haggai Eran
2015-05-31  6:56   ` Haggai Eran
2015-05-31  6:56   ` Haggai Eran
     [not found] <1432236233-4035-1-git-send-email-j.glisse@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <1432236233-4035-1-git-send-email-j.glisse-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-21 19:23   ` [PATCH 33/36] IB/odp/hmm: add core infiniband structure and helper for ODP with HMM j.glisse-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558AB7DC.20703@mellanox.com \
    --to=haggaie@mellanox.com \
    --cc=SCheung@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arvindg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=blc@redhat.com \
    --cc=cabuschardt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dpoole@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdonohue@redhat.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=ldunning@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liranl@mellanox.com \
    --cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhairgrove@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raindel@mellanox.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@p \
    --cc=sgutti@nvidia.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.