All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"Kumar, Vijaya" <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Manish Jaggi <mjaggi@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
	"Kulkarni, Ganapatrao" <Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2.
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:00:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55912534.4000606@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435575009.32500.258.camel@citrix.com>

On 29/06/15 11:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 11:31 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Manish,
>>
>> On 28/06/15 19:38, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>> 4.1 Holes in guest memory space
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Holes are added in the guest memory space for mapping pci device's BAR
>>> regions.
>>> These are defined in arch-arm.h
>>>
>>> /* For 32bit */
>>> GUEST_MMIO_HOLE0_BASE, GUEST_MMIO_HOLE0_SIZE
>>>  
>>> /* For 64bit */
>>> GUEST_MMIO_HOLE1_BASE , GUEST_MMIO_HOLE1_SIZE
>>
>> The memory layout for 32bit and 64bit are exactly the same. Why do you
>> need to differ here?
> 
> I took this to be a "hole under 4GB" and a "hole over 4GB" IOW rather
> than specific to 32-bit/64-bit guests it is specific to 32/64 bit
> devices, the latter of which could be placed higher in RAM, which is
> useful since the space under 4GB is naturally more limited.

I wasn't able to deduce that with this section. It needs a minimum of
explanation based on what you just said.

That also bring the question about 64 bit PCI and short page table. Do
we support it (i.e possibility to allocate 64 bit BAR below 4GB)?

I don't mind the answer, but it needs to be clarify for the implementation.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-29 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-28 18:38 PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2 Manish Jaggi
2015-06-29 10:31 ` Julien Grall
2015-06-29 10:50   ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-29 11:00     ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-07-05  5:55   ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06  6:13     ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06  9:11     ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-06 10:06       ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 10:20         ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-29  9:37           ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-30  9:54             ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-30 12:51               ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-30 14:39                 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31  7:46                   ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31  8:05                     ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 10:32                       ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 14:24                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-31 11:07                       ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 11:19                         ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 12:50                           ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 12:57                             ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 12:59                             ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 13:27                               ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 14:33                               ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 14:56                                 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 15:12                                   ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 15:13                                     ` Julien Grall
2015-07-06 10:43     ` Julien Grall
2015-07-06 11:09       ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 11:45         ` Julien Grall
2015-07-07  7:10           ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07  8:18             ` Julien Grall
2015-07-07  8:46               ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07 10:54                 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07 11:24                 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-09  7:13                   ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-09  8:08                     ` Julien Grall
2015-07-09 10:30                       ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-09 13:57                         ` Julien Grall
2015-07-10  6:07                           ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-07-14 16:37                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-14 16:46                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-14 16:58                           ` Julien Grall
2015-07-14 18:01                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-22  5:41                               ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-22  8:34                                 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-14 16:47                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-07 15:27     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-29 15:34 ` Ian Campbell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-05  6:07 Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06  9:07 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55912534.4000606@citrix.com \
    --to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=Prasun.kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=mjaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.