From: Manish Jaggi <mjaggi@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
"Kulkarni, Ganapatrao" <Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.kapoor@caviumnetworks.com>,
"Kumar, Vijaya" <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2.
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:43:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559A1C8A.1000702@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5598C6CD.2040207@caviumnetworks.com>
On Sunday 05 July 2015 11:25 AM, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 29 June 2015 04:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Manish,
>>
>> On 28/06/15 19:38, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>>> 4.1 Holes in guest memory space
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Holes are added in the guest memory space for mapping pci device's BAR
>>> regions.
>>> These are defined in arch-arm.h
>>>
>>> /* For 32bit */
>>> GUEST_MMIO_HOLE0_BASE, GUEST_MMIO_HOLE0_SIZE
>>> /* For 64bit */
>>> GUEST_MMIO_HOLE1_BASE , GUEST_MMIO_HOLE1_SIZE
>> The memory layout for 32bit and 64bit are exactly the same. Why do you
>> need to differ here?
> I think Ian has already replied. I will change the name of macro
>>> 4.2 New entries in xenstore for device BARs
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> toolkit also updates the xenstore information for the device
>>> (virtualbar:physical bar).
>>> This information is read by xenpciback and returned to the pcifront
>>> driver configuration
>>> space accesses.
>> Can you details what do you plan to put in xenstore and how?
> It is implementation . But I plan to put under domU / device / heirarchy
>> What about the expansion ROM?
> Do you want to put some restriction on not using expansion ROM as a
> passthrough device.
>>
>>> 4.3 Hypercall for bdf mapping notification to xen
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>> #define PHYSDEVOP_map_sbdf 43
>>> typedef struct {
>>> u32 s;
>>> u8 b;
>>> u8 df;
>>> u16 res;
>>> } sbdf_t;
>>> struct physdev_map_sbdf {
>>> int domain_id;
>>> sbdf_t sbdf;
>>> sbdf_t gsbdf;
>>> };
>>>
>>> Each domain has a pdev list, which contains the list of all pci
>>> devices.
>>> The
>>> pdev structure already has a sbdf information. The arch_pci_dev is
>>> updated to
>>> contain the gsbdf information. (gs- guest segment id)
>>>
>>> Whenever there is trap from guest or an interrupt has to be injected,
>>> the pdev
>>> list is iterated to find the gsbdf.
>> Can you give more background for this section? i.e:
>> - Why do you need this?
>> - How xen will translate the gbdf to a vDeviceID?
> In the context of the hypercall processing.
The hypercall handler in xen, would call its_assign_device(sbdf, gsbdf,
domid);
>> - Who will call this hypercall?
>> - Why not setting the gsbdf when the device is assigned?
> Can the maintainer of the pciback suggest an alternate.
> The answer to your question is that I have only found a place to issue
> the hypercall where
> all the information can be located is the function
> __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev
>
>
> drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c
> ----
> unlock:
> ...
> kfree(dev_entry);
>
> + /*Issue Hypercall here */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> + map_sbdf.domain_id = pdev->xdev->otherend_id;
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_s = dev->bus->domain_nr;
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_b = dev->bus->number;
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_d = dev->devfn>>3;
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_f = dev->devfn & 0x7;
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_s = 0;
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_b = 0;
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_d = slot;
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_f = dev->devfn & 0x7;
> + pr_info("## sbdf = %d:%d:%d.%d g_sbdf %d:%d:%d.%d \
> + domain_id=%d ##\r\n",
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_s,
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_b,
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_d,
> + map_sbdf.sbdf_f,
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_s,
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_b,
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_d,
> + map_sbdf.gsbdf_f,
> + map_sbdf.domain_id);
> +
> + err = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_map_sbdf, &map_sbdf);
> + if (err)
> + printk(KERN_ERR " Xen Error PHYSDEVOP_map_sbdf");
> +#endif
> ---
>
>> Regards,
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-28 18:38 PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2 Manish Jaggi
2015-06-29 10:31 ` Julien Grall
2015-06-29 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-29 11:00 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-05 5:55 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 6:13 ` Manish Jaggi [this message]
2015-07-06 9:11 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-06 10:06 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 10:20 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-29 9:37 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-30 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-30 12:51 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-30 14:39 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 7:46 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 8:05 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 10:32 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 14:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-31 11:07 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 12:50 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 12:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 12:59 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 13:27 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 14:33 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 14:56 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 15:12 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-31 15:13 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-06 10:43 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-06 11:09 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 11:45 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-07 7:10 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07 8:18 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-07 8:46 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07 10:54 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-07 11:24 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-09 7:13 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-09 8:08 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-09 10:30 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-09 13:57 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-10 6:07 ` Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
2015-07-14 16:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-14 16:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-14 16:58 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-14 18:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-22 5:41 ` Manish Jaggi
2015-07-22 8:34 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-14 16:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-07-07 15:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-29 15:34 ` Ian Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-05 6:07 Manish Jaggi
2015-07-06 9:07 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559A1C8A.1000702@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=mjaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Prasun.kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.