All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: m-karicheri2@ti.com (Murali Karicheri)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: keystone: allow FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER to be configurable on Keystone
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:54:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559588DA.4040300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701184842.GM7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell,

On 07/01/2015 02:48 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:53:02PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> Currently for Keystone devices, user can't change the
>> value of CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER option in defconfig.
>> Users require capability to tune the value of this option on a target
>> board. So this patch adds this capability
>
> No they shouldn't.  If we do permit this, it should not be unrestricted -
> it's a power-of-2 of the page size, so specifying something like 32768 is
> insane.
>

Thanks for your comments

This was present in out internal version of the kernel. Only thing I can 
recall is that this patch was added to fix an isue in a DEBUG buid. 
Memory allocation for a large data structures used by a driver during 
probe (internal version) was failing as the data structure gets expanded 
as a result of DEBUG option related variables. There is no hurry to add 
this for now.

> In any case, it's well known that the Linux MM system fragments memory,
> and the higher order allocations will fail soon after boot - and the
> larger the order, the greater chance of it failing.Ok
>

Agree

> The only case that you want large allocations is for things like DMA, and
> we have a separate allocator for that called CMA, which is able to grab
> large chunks of memory, provided it's configured with a large enough zone.
>
> Please check whether CMA can be used _before_ considering using this
> option.  If you need to increase the order, it should be justified, and
> it should be done on a per SoC basis in a static way, not left to the
> user to dream up some power-of-2 figure.
I will explore these options when we upstream the internal driver. For 
now I will drop this patch.

Thanks
-- 
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: keystone: allow FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER to be configurable on Keystone
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:54:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559588DA.4040300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701184842.GM7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell,

On 07/01/2015 02:48 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:53:02PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> Currently for Keystone devices, user can't change the
>> value of CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER option in defconfig.
>> Users require capability to tune the value of this option on a target
>> board. So this patch adds this capability
>
> No they shouldn't.  If we do permit this, it should not be unrestricted -
> it's a power-of-2 of the page size, so specifying something like 32768 is
> insane.
>

Thanks for your comments

This was present in out internal version of the kernel. Only thing I can 
recall is that this patch was added to fix an isue in a DEBUG buid. 
Memory allocation for a large data structures used by a driver during 
probe (internal version) was failing as the data structure gets expanded 
as a result of DEBUG option related variables. There is no hurry to add 
this for now.

> In any case, it's well known that the Linux MM system fragments memory,
> and the higher order allocations will fail soon after boot - and the
> larger the order, the greater chance of it failing.Ok
>

Agree

> The only case that you want large allocations is for things like DMA, and
> we have a separate allocator for that called CMA, which is able to grab
> large chunks of memory, provided it's configured with a large enough zone.
>
> Please check whether CMA can be used _before_ considering using this
> option.  If you need to increase the order, it should be justified, and
> it should be done on a per SoC basis in a static way, not left to the
> user to dream up some power-of-2 figure.
I will explore these options when we upstream the internal driver. For 
now I will drop this patch.

Thanks
-- 
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-02 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-01 17:53 [PATCH] ARM: keystone: allow FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER to be configurable on Keystone Murali Karicheri
2015-07-01 17:53 ` Murali Karicheri
2015-07-01 18:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-01 18:48   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-02 18:54   ` Murali Karicheri [this message]
2015-07-02 18:54     ` Murali Karicheri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559588DA.4040300@ti.com \
    --to=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.