All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler"
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:45:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5596A015.1030709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150703143703.GB19284@katana>



On 03/07/15 15:37, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the
>> broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as
>> broadcast device.
>
> We use the same board. Just my kernel has SMP=n.
>

If it's UP build, then GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is disabled. You
may be hitting the issue I reported[1] and is still under discussion.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/25/271

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler"
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:45:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5596A015.1030709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150703143703.GB19284@katana>



On 03/07/15 15:37, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the
>> broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as
>> broadcast device.
>
> We use the same board. Just my kernel has SMP=n.
>

If it's UP build, then GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is disabled. You
may be hitting the issue I reported[1] and is still under discussion.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/25/271

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler"
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:45:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5596A015.1030709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150703143703.GB19284@katana>



On 03/07/15 15:37, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the
>> broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as
>> broadcast device.
>
> We use the same board. Just my kernel has SMP=n.
>

If it's UP build, then GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST is disabled. You
may be hitting the issue I reported[1] and is still under discussion.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/25/271

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-03 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-03  2:40 Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler" Simon Horman
2015-07-03  2:40 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-03  2:40 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-03  6:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-03  6:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-03  6:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-03  9:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03  9:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03  9:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 10:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 10:54   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 10:54   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:02   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:02     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:02     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:07     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:07       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:07       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:13       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:13         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:13         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-07-03 11:41         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:41           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 11:41           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 13:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 13:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 13:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 13:32     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 13:32       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 13:32       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 14:17       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:17         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:17         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:37         ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 14:37           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 14:37           ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 14:45           ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-07-03 14:45             ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:45             ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:54             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:54               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:54               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:57               ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:57                 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:57                 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-03 14:53           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:53             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 14:53             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:09             ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:09               ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:09               ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:23               ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:23                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:23                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:40                 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:40                   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:40                   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 15:53                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:53                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 15:53                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-03 16:00                     ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 16:00                       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-03 16:00                       ` Wolfram Sang
2015-07-06  4:42               ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-06  4:42                 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-06  4:42                 ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-29  2:23             ` Simon Horman
2015-07-29  2:23               ` Simon Horman
2015-07-29  2:23               ` Simon Horman
2015-07-03 17:02           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-03 17:02             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-03 17:02             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-06  4:45             ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-06  4:45               ` Magnus Damm
2015-07-06  4:45               ` Magnus Damm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5596A015.1030709@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.