All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, <riel@redhat.com>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, kernel-team <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:34:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559A91F4.7000903@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436159590.5850.27.camel@gmail.com>

On 07/06/2015 01:13 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hm.  Piddling with pgbench, which doesn't seem to collapse into a
> quivering heap when load exceeds cores these days, deltas weren't all
> that impressive, but it does appreciate the extra effort a bit, and a
> bit more when clients receive it as well.
>
> If you test, and have time to piddle, you could try letting wake_wide()
> return 1 + sched_feat(WAKE_WIDE_IDLE) instead of adding only if wakee is
> the dispatcher.
>
> Numbers from my little desktop box.
>
> NO_WAKE_WIDE_IDLE
> postgres@homer:~> pgbench.sh
> clients 8       tps = 116697.697662
> clients 12      tps = 115160.230523
> clients 16      tps = 115569.804548
> clients 20      tps = 117879.230514
> clients 24      tps = 118281.753040
> clients 28      tps = 116974.796627
> clients 32      tps = 119082.163998   avg   117092.239   1.000
>
> WAKE_WIDE_IDLE
> postgres@homer:~> pgbench.sh
> clients 8       tps = 124351.735754
> clients 12      tps = 124419.673135
> clients 16      tps = 125050.716498
> clients 20      tps = 124813.042352
> clients 24      tps = 126047.442307
> clients 28      tps = 125373.719401
> clients 32      tps = 126711.243383   avg   125252.510   1.069   1.000
>
> WAKE_WIDE_IDLE (clients as well as server)
> postgres@homer:~> pgbench.sh
> clients 8       tps = 130539.795246
> clients 12      tps = 128984.648554
> clients 16      tps = 130564.386447
> clients 20      tps = 129149.693118
> clients 24      tps = 130211.119780
> clients 28      tps = 130325.355433
> clients 32      tps = 129585.656963   avg   129908.665   1.109   1.037
>

I have time for twiddling, we're carrying ye olde WAKE_IDLE until we get 
this solved upstream and then I'll rip out the old and put in the new, 
I'm happy to screw around until we're all happy.  I'll throw this in a 
kernel this morning and run stuff today.  Barring any issues with the 
testing infrastructure I should have results today.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-27 21:22 [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE Josef Bacik
2015-05-28  3:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28  9:49   ` Morten Rasmussen
2015-05-28 10:57     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:48       ` Morten Rasmussen
2015-05-28 11:49         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 14:27     ` Josef Bacik
2015-05-29 21:03     ` Josef Bacik
2015-05-30  3:55       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-01 19:38       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-01 20:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 21:03           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-02 17:12           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 14:12             ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-03 14:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 14:49                 ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 15:30                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 15:57                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 16:53                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 17:16                       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-03 17:43                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-03 20:34                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-04  4:52                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-01 22:15         ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-11 20:33     ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-12  3:42       ` Rik van Riel
2015-06-12  5:35     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-17 18:06       ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-18  0:55         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-18  3:46           ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-18  4:12             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02 17:44               ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-03  6:40                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-03  9:29                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-04 15:57                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-05  7:17                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06  5:13                       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06 14:34                         ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2015-07-06 18:36                           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-06 19:41                             ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-07  4:01                               ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07  9:43                                 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07 13:40                                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-07 15:24                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-07 17:06                                   ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-08  6:13                                     ` [patch] sched: beef up wake_wide() Mike Galbraith
2015-07-09 13:26                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-09 14:07                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-09 14:46                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-10  5:19                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-10 13:41                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-10 20:59                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-11  3:11                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-13 13:53                                               ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-14 11:19                                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 13:49                                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 14:07                                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 14:17                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 15:04                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 15:39                                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-14 16:01                                                           ` Josef Bacik
2015-07-14 17:59                                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-15 17:11                                                               ` Josef Bacik
2015-08-03 17:07                                                           ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Beef " tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:16   ` [PATCH RESEND] sched: prefer an idle cpu vs an idle sibling for BALANCE_WAKE Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 11:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-28 12:15       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-28 12:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-28 12:29           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-28 15:22           ` David Ahern
2015-05-28 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559A91F4.7000903@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.