All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@bitmath.org>
To: Matt Whitlock <linux@mattwhitlock.name>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: bcm5974 - report ABS_MT_PRESSURE + remove redundant emulation code
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:44:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559ADA98.8060002@bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4086356.XLcl34THVt@crushinator>

>> I think your patch is a good reduction, all in accord with what we talked about,
>> but I have doubts that it will not create regressions. From what I have seen so
>> far, patch-wise, the best solution is to leave the code as it is.
> 
> So you believe that the current (in-tree) behavior is superior to either of my attempts thus far to fix it?

That is not at all what I said. I like the result of your patch set. The
question is how it works with linux in general.

>> I understand that the constraints now seem to depict the empty set, but maybe
>> there is a third solution.
> 
> Can you characterize what an acceptable solution would look like? The behavior of the code as it stands is really not acceptable; the MacBook Pro touchpad's buggy behavior in Linux is extremely frustrating, relative to its flawless behavior in OS X. My patchset has not introduced any regressions that I can observe, and in fact it has nearly eliminated the spurious drags. (I still get one occasionally, but maybe at a rate of ~1% as often as I was seeing them before.)

The constraints so far are:

1. Make the situation on the problematic devices better
2. Do not invent sensor data
3. Do not create regressions

Taken together, it suggests that the patch should be similar, but not equal to,
the original patch.

Thanks,
Henrik


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-03 11:49 [PATCH] Input: bcm5974 - report highest finger pressure to Synaptics Matt Whitlock
2015-06-03 12:24 ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-06-03 12:31   ` Matt Whitlock
2015-06-03 12:52     ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-06-09  1:07       ` [PATCH 1/2] Input: input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(), rescale pressure + tool width Matt Whitlock
2015-06-09  1:07         ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: bcm5974 - report ABS_MT_PRESSURE + remove redundant emulation code Matt Whitlock
2015-07-06 18:37           ` Matt Whitlock
2015-07-06 19:11             ` Henrik Rydberg
2015-07-06 19:35               ` Matt Whitlock
2015-07-06 19:44                 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2015-07-06 19:59                   ` Matt Whitlock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559ADA98.8060002@bitmath.org \
    --to=rydberg@bitmath.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@mattwhitlock.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.