From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:33:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559FB482.4020503@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPeF6N_=FhBYOYTTxnGgU8GcTrbqthPNU=bXBfo7Db0Lkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-07-09 21:53 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:14 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 05:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2015-07-09 20:47 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath
>>>> <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with some feature
>>>>> additions, for example, support for dual phase on BUCK1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There are already drivers for 88PM860: mfd, charger and battery. Isn't
>>>> you duplicating existing code?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please point me to MFD driver for 88PM860 (Not the charger and
>>> battery, as I treat them subdevice) ???
>>>
>>> I do not think 88PM860 MFD driver is supported already. Correct me if I
>>> am wrong.
>>>
>>
>> If you are referring to 88pm860x driver, then the answer is NO,
>> as they both are totally different.
>
> I am confused... so the driver drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c and its
> child drivers do not support 88pm860 device? They support 88pm860x
> device which is totally different than 88pm860 device?
>
Yes, that's correct.
That's my understanding as well.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:33:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559FB482.4020503@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPeF6N_=FhBYOYTTxnGgU8GcTrbqthPNU=bXBfo7Db0Lkg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-07-09 21:53 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:14 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 05:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2015-07-09 20:47 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath
>>>> <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with some feature
>>>>> additions, for example, support for dual phase on BUCK1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There are already drivers for 88PM860: mfd, charger and battery. Isn't
>>>> you duplicating existing code?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please point me to MFD driver for 88PM860 (Not the charger and
>>> battery, as I treat them subdevice) ???
>>>
>>> I do not think 88PM860 MFD driver is supported already. Correct me if I
>>> am wrong.
>>>
>>
>> If you are referring to 88pm860x driver, then the answer is NO,
>> as they both are totally different.
>
> I am confused... so the driver drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c and its
> child drivers do not support 88pm860 device? They support 88pm860x
> device which is totally different than 88pm860 device?
>
Yes, that's correct.
That's my understanding as well.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:33:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559FB482.4020503@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPeF6N_=FhBYOYTTxnGgU8GcTrbqthPNU=bXBfo7Db0Lkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-07-09 21:53 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 06:14 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 09 July 2015 05:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2015-07-09 20:47 GMT+09:00 Vaibhav Hiremath
>>>> <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> 88PM860 falls under 88pm800 family of devices, with some feature
>>>>> additions, for example, support for dual phase on BUCK1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> There are already drivers for 88PM860: mfd, charger and battery. Isn't
>>>> you duplicating existing code?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please point me to MFD driver for 88PM860 (Not the charger and
>>> battery, as I treat them subdevice) ???
>>>
>>> I do not think 88PM860 MFD driver is supported already. Correct me if I
>>> am wrong.
>>>
>>
>> If you are referring to 88pm860x driver, then the answer is NO,
>> as they both are totally different.
>
> I am confused... so the driver drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c and its
> child drivers do not support 88pm860 device? They support 88pm860x
> device which is totally different than 88pm860 device?
>
Yes, that's correct.
That's my understanding as well.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 11:47 [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] mfd: 88pm80x: Add 88pm860 chip type support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-11 6:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 6:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 6:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add init time initial configuration support Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-11 6:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 6:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 6:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:10 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:10 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:10 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] mfd: devicetree: bindings: 88pm800: Add DT property for 32KHz output enable Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-11 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 7:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:24 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:24 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:38 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:38 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:38 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] mfd: 88pm800: Enable 32KHZ XO low jitter clock out Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] mfd: devicetree: bindings: 88pm800: Add DT property for dual phase enable Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-11 7:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 7:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 7:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 7:50 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:50 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 7:50 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 8:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 8:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 14:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 14:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-13 14:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add support for configuration of dual phase on BUCK1 Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 11:47 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 12:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] mfd: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 device support Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 12:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 12:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 12:44 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 12:44 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 12:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 12:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 12:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-09 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-09 13:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-10 12:03 ` Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-07-10 12:03 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-10 12:03 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-11 6:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-11 6:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559FB482.4020503@linaro.org \
--to=vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.