From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: Build error with !CONFIG_SMP in v4.2-rc1 on arm multi_v7_defconfig
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:36:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A01EBB.2040106@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A01D84.8070701@ti.com>
On 07/10/2015 12:31 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeing the following error when building v4.2-rc1 for arm with
> multi_v7_defconfig with CONFIG_SMP=n:
>
> LINK vmlinux
> LD vmlinux.o
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> GEN .version
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> UPD include/generated/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `qcom_pm_collapse':
> :(.text+0xaf44c): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_cpu_power_down'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `qcom_cpuidle_init':
> :(.init.text+0x9508): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
>
> It appears the calling functions in drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c get included by
> CONFIG_QCOM_PM which is part of multi_v7_defconfig but the missing functions
> from drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c only get included by CONFIG_QCOM_SCM if SMP is
> selected. I am not sure if the correct approach is to remove CONFIG_QCOM_PM from
> multi_v7_defconfig or to remove 'if SMP' from CONFIG_QCOM_SCM, or something else
> entirely. Thoughts?
>
>
CONFIG_QCOM_PM should select CONFIG_QCOM_SCM unconditionally.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Build error with !CONFIG_SMP in v4.2-rc1 on arm multi_v7_defconfig
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:36:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A01EBB.2040106@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A01D84.8070701@ti.com>
On 07/10/2015 12:31 PM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeing the following error when building v4.2-rc1 for arm with
> multi_v7_defconfig with CONFIG_SMP=n:
>
> LINK vmlinux
> LD vmlinux.o
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> GEN .version
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> UPD include/generated/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `qcom_pm_collapse':
> :(.text+0xaf44c): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_cpu_power_down'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `qcom_cpuidle_init':
> :(.init.text+0x9508): undefined reference to `qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
>
> It appears the calling functions in drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c get included by
> CONFIG_QCOM_PM which is part of multi_v7_defconfig but the missing functions
> from drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c only get included by CONFIG_QCOM_SCM if SMP is
> selected. I am not sure if the correct approach is to remove CONFIG_QCOM_PM from
> multi_v7_defconfig or to remove 'if SMP' from CONFIG_QCOM_SCM, or something else
> entirely. Thoughts?
>
>
CONFIG_QCOM_PM should select CONFIG_QCOM_SCM unconditionally.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 19:31 Build error with !CONFIG_SMP in v4.2-rc1 on arm multi_v7_defconfig Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 19:31 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 19:31 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 19:36 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-07-10 19:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-10 20:29 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:29 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:29 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:39 ` Lina Iyer
2015-07-10 20:39 ` Lina Iyer
2015-07-10 20:42 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:42 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:42 ` Dave Gerlach
2015-07-10 20:18 ` [PATCH] drivers: qcom: Select QCOM_SCM unconditionally for QCOM_PM Lina Iyer
2015-07-10 20:18 ` Lina Iyer
2015-07-10 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-10 21:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-14 21:54 ` Andy Gross
2015-07-14 21:54 ` Andy Gross
2015-07-23 20:07 ` Andy Gross
2015-07-23 20:07 ` Andy Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A01EBB.2040106@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.