Re: teuthology rados runs for next

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

Ok !

teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-18_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi
teuthology-kill -m multi -r teuthology-2015-07-20_21:00:09-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

I observed that the older 

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-17_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

is half way through but does not seem to make progress while the one scheduled today

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-07-19_21:00:10-rados-next-distro-basic-multi

has one job running. Do you think best to kill the newer so it does not compete for resources that would prevent the older from finishing ? I'd be tempted to kill the newer because it's so difficult to get jobs running right now that it makes sense to preserve a run that already managed to pass > 100 jobs :-)

Cheers

On 21/07/2015 15:43, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> I noticed today that http://pulpito.ceph.com/?suite=rados&branch=next is 
>> lagging three days behind. Do we want to keep all the runs or should we 
>> kill the older ones ? I suppose there would be value in having the 
>> results for all of them but given the current load in the sepia lab it 
>> also significantly delays them. What do you think ?
> 
> I think it's better to kill old scheduled runs.
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]