All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:50:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AEB094.1090601@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721203018.GH21967@google.com>



On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver
> 
> This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data
> but ARM64 does not,

Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of
removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we
need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64.

and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why
> not?),

under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:

 41 /*
 42  * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
 43  */
 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 45 {
 46         dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
 47
 48         return 0;
 49 }

interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device
for arm64.

ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64
> uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc.
> 

Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32
based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata.

>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c |   15 ++++-----------
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h |    8 ++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> index d77481e..8a556d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@
>>  #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN               0x330
>>  #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK             0xf
>>  
>> -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  /**
>>   * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer
>>   * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c
>> @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>  					    unsigned int devfn,
>>  					    int where)
>>  {
>> -	struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata;
>> -	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> +	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
>>  	unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
>>  	unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
>>  	unsigned busno = bus->number;
>> @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>>  
>>  	iproc_pcie_reset(pcie);
>>  
>> -	pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie;
>> -
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops,
>> -				  &pcie->sysdata, res);
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res);
>>  	if (!bus) {
>>  		dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n");
>>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>>  
>>  	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>>  	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>  	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq);
>> +#endif
>>  	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * iProc PCIe device
>> + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of
>> + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with
>> + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver
>>   * @dev: pointer to device data structure
>>   * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base
>>   * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources
>> - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data
>>   * @root_bus: pointer to root bus
>>   * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes
>>   * @irqs: interrupt IDs
>>   */
>>  struct iproc_pcie {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
>> +#endif
> 
> I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64.  We can
> at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed.  I'm a little more
> hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within
> struct iproc_pcie.  I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries
> out for fixing than something minimal and fragile.
> 

Yes that was my original code and that was a bit ugly. Arnd proposed
this and it does indeed make the look a lot cleaner. But yeah, it now
depends on the location of struct pci_sys_data in memory and I see your
concern. In fact, I asked exactly the same question to Arnd.

Are you okay with living with this for a little while until struct
pci_sys_data is eventually removed from arm32?

> I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its
> original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to
> move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's
> email on the list.
> 

Sorry maybe you need to elaborate here. Am I supposed to add Arnd's name
in the commit message? Other than that, Arnd is on this email thread.

>>  	struct device *dev;
>>  	void __iomem *base;
>> -	struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
>>  	struct pci_bus *root_bus;
>>  	struct phy *phy;
>>  	int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS];
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rjui@broadcom.com (Ray Jui)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:50:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AEB094.1090601@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721203018.GH21967@google.com>



On 7/21/2015 1:30 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>> This patch enables arm64 support to the iProc PCIe driver
> 
> This needs a little more explanation: ARM has a common struct pci_sys_data
> but ARM64 does not,

Correct, and according to Arnd, there's already work in process of
removing the need for pci_sys_data on arm32. Before that is done, we
need this in the driver for it to work on both arm32 and arm64.

and ARM needs pci_fixup_irqs() but ARM64 does not (why
> not?),

under arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:

 41 /*
 42  * Try to assign the IRQ number from DT when adding a new device
 43  */
 44 int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
 45 {
 46         dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
 47
 48         return 0;
 49 }

interrupt is automatically parsed and mapped when adding a new device
for arm64.

ARM uses the common pci_sys_data for the PCI sysdata while ARM64
> uses a driver-specific sysdata, etc.
> 

Correct. pci_sys_data for arm32 will eventually be removed, so all arm32
based PCie host should only need to carry driver specific sysdata.

>> Signed-off-by: Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c |   15 ++++-----------
>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h |    8 ++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> index d77481e..8a556d5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
>> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@
>>  #define SYS_RC_INTX_EN               0x330
>>  #define SYS_RC_INTX_MASK             0xf
>>  
>> -static inline struct iproc_pcie *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> -	return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>>  /**
>>   * Note access to the configuration registers are protected at the higher layer
>>   * by 'pci_lock' in drivers/pci/access.c
>> @@ -71,8 +66,7 @@ static void __iomem *iproc_pcie_map_cfg_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>  					    unsigned int devfn,
>>  					    int where)
>>  {
>> -	struct pci_sys_data *sys = bus->sysdata;
>> -	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> +	struct iproc_pcie *pcie = bus->sysdata;
>>  	unsigned slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
>>  	unsigned fn = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
>>  	unsigned busno = bus->number;
>> @@ -208,10 +202,7 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>>  
>>  	iproc_pcie_reset(pcie);
>>  
>> -	pcie->sysdata.private_data = pcie;
>> -
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops,
>> -				  &pcie->sysdata, res);
>> +	bus = pci_create_root_bus(pcie->dev, 0, &iproc_pcie_ops, pcie, res);
>>  	if (!bus) {
>>  		dev_err(pcie->dev, "unable to create PCI root bus\n");
>>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -229,7 +220,9 @@ int iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *res)
>>  
>>  	pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>>  	pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>  	pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, pcie->map_irq);
>> +#endif
>>  	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> index ba0a108..0ee9673 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.h
>> @@ -18,18 +18,22 @@
>>  
>>  /**
>>   * iProc PCIe device
>> + * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data. This needs to be kept at the beginning of
>> + * struct iproc_pcie, to enable support of both ARM32 and ARM64 platforms with
>> + * minimal changes in the iProc PCIe core driver
>>   * @dev: pointer to device data structure
>>   * @base: PCIe host controller I/O register base
>>   * @resources: linked list of all PCI resources
>> - * @sysdata: Per PCI controller data
>>   * @root_bus: pointer to root bus
>>   * @phy: optional PHY device that controls the Serdes
>>   * @irqs: interrupt IDs
>>   */
>>  struct iproc_pcie {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +	struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
>> +#endif
> 
> I'm OK with adding #ifdefs to make this work on both ARM and ARM64.  We can
> at least see the ifdefs and know what needs to be fixed.  I'm a little more
> hesitant about adding code that depends on the position of sysdata within
> struct iproc_pcie.  I'd rather have something ugly and robust that cries
> out for fixing than something minimal and fragile.
> 

Yes that was my original code and that was a bit ugly. Arnd proposed
this and it does indeed make the look a lot cleaner. But yeah, it now
depends on the location of struct pci_sys_data in memory and I see your
concern. In fact, I asked exactly the same question to Arnd.

Are you okay with living with this for a little while until struct
pci_sys_data is eventually removed from arm32?

> I see that your v1 patch added #ifdef CONFIG_ARM around sysdata at its
> original location below, and you mentioned that you took Arnd's advice to
> move sysdata to the beginning of the structure, but I don't see Arnd's
> email on the list.
> 

Sorry maybe you need to elaborate here. Am I supposed to add Arnd's name
in the commit message? Other than that, Arnd is on this email thread.

>>  	struct device *dev;
>>  	void __iomem *base;
>> -	struct pci_sys_data sysdata;
>>  	struct pci_bus *root_bus;
>>  	struct phy *phy;
>>  	int irqs[IPROC_PCIE_MAX_NUM_IRQS];
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-16  4:39 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add Broadcom North Star 2 support Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39 ` Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: iproc: enable arm64 support for iProc PCIe Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39   ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 20:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 20:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 20:50     ` Ray Jui [this message]
2015-07-21 20:50       ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 21:04       ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 21:04         ` Ray Jui
2015-07-21 22:02       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 22:02         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-22  0:01         ` Ray Jui
2015-07-22  0:01           ` Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: iproc: Fix ARM64 dependency in Kconfig Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39   ` Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Add Broadcom iProc family support Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39   ` Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: Add Broadcom North Star 2 support Ray Jui
2015-07-16  4:39   ` Ray Jui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AEB094.1090601@broadcom.com \
    --to=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.