From: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
To: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gem: tolerate a buffer specified multiple times
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:51:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BEBAFE.1040506@nexus-software.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BBBA3E.5010102@nexus-software.ie>
On 31/07/15 19:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 17:43, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 31/07/15 17:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Do you have a reproducible way of achieving the multiple buffer on
>>> validation list thing?
Ilia, Peter.
I've filed a bug for you here :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91535
I've verified that Peter's PPA library when installed fixes the race
condition you guys were talking about but running the test program
tests/nouveau/threaded so, this issue we're discussing here is a
separate one.
Cheers,
Bryan
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
To: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gem: tolerate a buffer specified multiple times
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:51:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BEBAFE.1040506@nexus-software.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55BBBA3E.5010102@nexus-software.ie>
On 31/07/15 19:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 31/07/15 17:43, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 31/07/15 17:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Do you have a reproducible way of achieving the multiple buffer on
>>> validation list thing?
Ilia, Peter.
I've filed a bug for you here :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91535
I've verified that Peter's PPA library when installed fixes the race
condition you guys were talking about but running the test program
tests/nouveau/threaded so, this issue we're discussing here is a
separate one.
Cheers,
Bryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 10:28 [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gem: tolerate a buffer specified multiple times Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-30 14:12 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-30 14:46 ` Peter Hurley
2015-07-30 14:55 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-30 14:48 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-30 14:49 ` Peter Hurley
2015-07-30 14:49 ` Peter Hurley
2015-07-30 14:52 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-30 14:56 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-30 15:02 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-30 15:02 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-30 15:14 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-30 15:26 ` Emil Velikov
2015-07-30 15:26 ` Emil Velikov
2015-07-30 21:45 ` Peter Hurley
2015-07-30 21:45 ` Peter Hurley
2015-07-31 0:03 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 9:53 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 9:58 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 10:27 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 16:36 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-31 16:36 ` Ilia Mirkin
2015-07-31 16:43 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 16:43 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 18:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 18:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-08-03 0:51 ` Bryan O'Donoghue [this message]
2015-08-03 0:51 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 16:19 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2015-07-31 16:19 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BEBAFE.1040506@nexus-software.ie \
--to=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=imirkin@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=tjaalton@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.