From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 6/8] arm64: dts: add SRAM, MHU mailbox and SCPI support on Juno
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:43:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF61DD.7020003@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438602393.5218.3.camel@linaro.org>
On 03/08/15 12:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 12:23 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for the MHU mailbox peripheral used on Juno by
>>> application processors to communicate with remote SCP handling most of
>>> the CPU/system power management. It also adds the SRAM reserving the
>>> shared memory and SCPI message protocol using that shared memory.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
>>> index e3ee96036eca..c624208edef6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
> [...]
>>> + scpi {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi";
>>> + mboxes = <&mailbox 1>;
>>> + shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>;
>>> +
>>> + clocks {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-clocks";
>>> +
>>> + scpi_dvfs: scpi_clocks at 0 {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-dvfs-clocks";
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "atlclk", "aplclk","gpuclk";
>>> + };
>>> + scpi_clk: scpi_clocks at 3 {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-variable-clocks";
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + clock-indices = <3>, <4>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "pxlclk0", "pxlclk1";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>
>> Sorry for noticing this after the ACK, is there any reason why the scpi node is not inside
>> the juno-clocks.dtsi file?
>
> Because SCPI is not just about clocks? Just happens that these first
> patches are but there's thermal sensors and other things as well.
>
I think we cross posted. Anyways I completely agree with you.
However I wanted the clock nodes to be put in juno-clock.dtsi but got
into horrible issue with the way we include headers. It may need some
reworking to get that working.
The idea was:
/* in juno-base.dtsi */
SCPI: scpi {
compatible = "arm,scpi";
mboxes = <&mailbox 1>;
shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>;
...
};
/* in juno-clock.dtsi */
&SCPI {
clocks {
compatible = "arm,scpi-clocks";
scpi_dvfs: scpi_clocks at 0 {
compatible = "arm,scpi-dvfs-clocks";
#clock-cells = <1>;
clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
clock-output-names = "atlclk","aplclk","gpuclk";
};
};
I will look at that when I get some time. There are many DTS files
already using something similar.
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] arm64: dts: add SRAM, MHU mailbox and SCPI support on Juno
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:43:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BF61DD.7020003@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438602393.5218.3.camel@linaro.org>
On 03/08/15 12:46, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 12:23 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 06:43:09PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for the MHU mailbox peripheral used on Juno by
>>> application processors to communicate with remote SCP handling most of
>>> the CPU/system power management. It also adds the SRAM reserving the
>>> shared memory and SCPI message protocol using that shared memory.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
>>> index e3ee96036eca..c624208edef6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi
> [...]
>>> + scpi {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi";
>>> + mboxes = <&mailbox 1>;
>>> + shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>;
>>> +
>>> + clocks {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-clocks";
>>> +
>>> + scpi_dvfs: scpi_clocks@0 {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-dvfs-clocks";
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "atlclk", "aplclk","gpuclk";
>>> + };
>>> + scpi_clk: scpi_clocks@3 {
>>> + compatible = "arm,scpi-variable-clocks";
>>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>>> + clock-indices = <3>, <4>;
>>> + clock-output-names = "pxlclk0", "pxlclk1";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>
>> Sorry for noticing this after the ACK, is there any reason why the scpi node is not inside
>> the juno-clocks.dtsi file?
>
> Because SCPI is not just about clocks? Just happens that these first
> patches are but there's thermal sensors and other things as well.
>
I think we cross posted. Anyways I completely agree with you.
However I wanted the clock nodes to be put in juno-clock.dtsi but got
into horrible issue with the way we include headers. It may need some
reworking to get that working.
The idea was:
/* in juno-base.dtsi */
SCPI: scpi {
compatible = "arm,scpi";
mboxes = <&mailbox 1>;
shmem = <&cpu_scp_hpri>;
...
};
/* in juno-clock.dtsi */
&SCPI {
clocks {
compatible = "arm,scpi-clocks";
scpi_dvfs: scpi_clocks@0 {
compatible = "arm,scpi-dvfs-clocks";
#clock-cells = <1>;
clock-indices = <0>, <1>, <2>;
clock-output-names = "atlclk","aplclk","gpuclk";
};
};
I will look at that when I get some time. There are many DTS files
already using something similar.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 17:43 [PATCH v6 0/8] ARM64: juno: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] Documentation: add DT binding for ARM System Control and Power Interface(SCPI) protocol Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] firmware: add support " Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] arm64: dts: add SRAM, MHU mailbox and SCPI support on Juno Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 11:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 11:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 11:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 11:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 12:47 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 12:47 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 11:46 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-08-03 11:46 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-08-03 12:43 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-08-03 12:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] arm64: dts: add CPU topology " Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] arm64: dts: add clock support for all the cpus Sudeep Holla
2015-07-31 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 10:18 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] ARM64: juno: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 10:18 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-08-03 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-05 9:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-05 9:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-06 8:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-06 8:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-06 8:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-06 8:42 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BF61DD.7020003@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.