From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Cc: Gregory Farnum <greg@gregs42.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhishek L <abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.3
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:47:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C09830.8040008@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C7284C47-5C31-4AB5-8AFD-1DF901C7ED67@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2080 bytes --]
Hi,
On 04/08/2015 04:01, Yan, Zheng wrote:> Hi Loic.
>
> Yes, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 is problematic. Do you mean should we include these RPs in v0.94.3? These RPs fix a bug in rare configure, I think it’s not a big deal to not include it in v0.94.3
Both https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 and https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5427 are already in the upcoming v0.94.3 release that is going to be published. Do you think they will cause problem ?
Cheers
>
> Regards
> Yan, Zheng
>
>
>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 00:32, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I assume the "file handle reference counting" is about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12088 which is backported as described at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12319. It was indeed somewhat problematic and required two pull requests: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5222 (authored by Yan Zheng) and https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5427 (merged by Yan Zheng).
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On 03/08/2015 18:01, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:43 PM Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/hammer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#fs). Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>> I'm on vacation right now, but the only thing I see there that might
>>> be iffy is the backport of the file handle reference counting. As long
>>> as that is all good (Zheng?) things look fine to me.
>>> -Greg
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11990#Release-information has direct links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.2 in case you need more context about one of them.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 15:43 CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.3 Loic Dachary
2015-08-03 16:01 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-08-03 16:32 ` Loic Dachary
2015-08-04 2:01 ` Yan, Zheng
2015-08-04 10:47 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C09830.8040008@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=greg@gregs42.com \
--cc=zyan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.