From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"jaswinder.singh@linaro.org" <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:18:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C0D7DC.2060709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ5Y-eaibuK0c_wSsRjM68vOfuRdRSChRdzR=2qtwVYwQcAzVQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/08/15 15:58, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
> On 4 August 2015 at 10:51, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 03/08/15 18:40, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 July 2015 at 10:21, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> On 09/07/15 19:04, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In general, you need to split this series so that initially few patches
>>>> deal with all the existing Kconfig fix-ups and then introduce
>>>> PCC/PSS/CPPC related stuffs. That would help me rebase and test _LPI
>>>> support.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hm. I tried to maintain bisectability and make it easier for you to
>>> rebase LPI patchwork too. Let me see if I can revisit now that I'm
>>> back from vacation. :)
>>>
>>
>> How about you just drop any idle related changes so that I will handle
>> that to keep it simple.
>
> Unfortunately I can't skip idle changes completely since it is tightly
> coupled with the acpi_processor driver as well.
>
True, but only for ARM64 where we haven't enabled ACPI_PROCESSOR yet in
mainline. So from that perspective, it should not cause any issue for
keeping changes bisectable on x86/ia64. You can keep these idle changes
locally for your testing. Trying to get everything at once will
definitely be problematic IMO.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 18:04 [PATCH v7 0/8] CPUFreq driver using CPPC methods Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] PCC: Initialize PCC Mailbox earlier at boot Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 17:37 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-18 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-18 0:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-03 17:26 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-03 17:24 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-20 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-08-03 17:49 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-03 17:29 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 14:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] ACPI: Decouple ACPI idle and ACPI processor drivers Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 17:40 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 14:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-04 14:58 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 15:18 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-08-04 15:44 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 17:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-05 13:47 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 15:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-04 15:38 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 16:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-20 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-21 8:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-21 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-21 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] ACPI: Add weak routines for ACPI CPU Hotplug Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] CPPC: Probe for CPPC tables for each ACPI Processor object Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-09 18:04 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] PCC: Enable PCC only when needed Ashwin Chaugule
2015-07-20 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-20 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-21 9:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-21 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-21 15:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-22 1:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-22 8:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-03 17:35 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-08-04 14:53 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C0D7DC.2060709@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.