From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>,
dianders@chromium.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: rockchip: add pclk_pd_pmu to the list of rk3288 critical clocks
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:44:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C11621.1000609@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10063547.S7PvqCkF78@diego>
On 08/04/2015 12:40 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 12:34:39 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
>> On 08/04/2015 01:54 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 14:41:26 schrieb Lin Huang:
>>>
>>> I guess this patch then would need a
>>>
>>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>
>>> at this point to override the author then.
>> Sounds right. Please resend the patch properly. Also, is there a 2/2? I
>> never got it.
> Patch 2/2 is a pinctrl change, that actually depends in this patch.
> Improved clock-handling in the pinctrl driver caused the pd_pmu clock to get
> deactivated.
>
> So, perhaps it might be even better to get an Ack from the clock maintainer
> and merge both patches through the pinctrl tree?
>
>
> In which case Linus Walleij should also be included as recipient of this patch
> when resending.
Ok that's fine. We can ack it and you can take it through pinctrl if needed.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: rockchip: add pclk_pd_pmu to the list of rk3288 critical clocks
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 12:44:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C11621.1000609@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10063547.S7PvqCkF78@diego>
On 08/04/2015 12:40 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 12:34:39 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
>> On 08/04/2015 01:54 AM, Heiko St?bner wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 14:41:26 schrieb Lin Huang:
>>>
>>> I guess this patch then would need a
>>>
>>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>
>>> at this point to override the author then.
>> Sounds right. Please resend the patch properly. Also, is there a 2/2? I
>> never got it.
> Patch 2/2 is a pinctrl change, that actually depends in this patch.
> Improved clock-handling in the pinctrl driver caused the pd_pmu clock to get
> deactivated.
>
> So, perhaps it might be even better to get an Ack from the clock maintainer
> and merge both patches through the pinctrl tree?
>
>
> In which case Linus Walleij should also be included as recipient of this patch
> when resending.
Ok that's fine. We can ack it and you can take it through pinctrl if needed.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-04 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-04 6:41 [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: rockchip: add pclk_pd_pmu to the list of rk3288 critical clocks Lin Huang
2015-08-04 6:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: rockchip: only enable gpio clock when it setting Lin Huang
[not found] ` <1438670487-27598-2-git-send-email-hl-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-04 8:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 8:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 8:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: rockchip: add pclk_pd_pmu to the list of rk3288 critical clocks Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 8:54 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 19:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-08-04 19:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-08-04 19:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 19:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 19:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-08-04 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-08-04 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C11621.1000609@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=hl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.