From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
<galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
<mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
<pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
<robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel-xBCQruHUn5ppWr+L1FloEB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>,
<ssantosh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811090342.GG10748-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
>
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
>
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
>
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...
The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.
> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811090342.GG10748@sirena.org.uk>
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
>
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
>
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
>
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...
The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.
> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.
Thanks,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org,
linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-xBCQruHUn5ppWr+L1FloEB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org,
ssantosh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811090342.GG10748-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
>
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
>
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
>
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...
The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.
> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
<ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<pawel.moll@arm.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@list.infradead.org>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811090342.GG10748@sirena.org.uk>
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
>
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
>
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
>
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual? Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...
The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.
> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.
I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-11 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-22 12:32 [RESEND][PATCH 0/4] spi: davinci: Improve prescaler limit support Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` [RESEND][PATCH 1/4] spi: davinci: Set prescale value based on register value Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
[not found] ` <1437568344-18889-1-git-send-email-fcooper-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-22 12:32 ` [RESEND][PATCH 2/4] spi: davinci: Choose correct pre-scaler limit based on SOC Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
[not found] ` <1437568344-18889-3-git-send-email-fcooper-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-24 11:49 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-24 11:49 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-24 11:49 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-24 11:49 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-22 12:32 ` [RESEND][PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: keystone: Add ti,keystone-spi for SPI Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 16:17 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-07-22 16:17 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-07-22 16:17 ` santosh shilimkar
[not found] ` <55AFC207.3050100-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-24 13:36 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-24 13:36 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-24 13:36 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-24 13:36 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
[not found] ` <55DB1DC5.7060607-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-24 16:15 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-08-24 16:15 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-08-24 16:15 ` santosh shilimkar
2015-07-22 12:32 ` [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit value Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-22 12:32 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2015-07-24 11:50 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-24 11:50 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-07-24 11:50 ` Sekhar Nori
[not found] ` <55B22681.3060000-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-10 23:47 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-10 23:47 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-10 23:47 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
2015-08-10 23:47 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr.
[not found] ` <55C9380D.1060802-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-11 6:58 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-08-11 6:58 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-08-11 6:58 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-08-11 6:58 ` Sekhar Nori
[not found] ` <55C99D0D.9050605-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-11 9:03 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-11 9:03 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-11 9:03 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20150811090342.GG10748-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-11 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2015-08-11 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-08-11 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori
2015-08-11 9:24 ` Sekhar Nori
[not found] ` <55C9BF51.5080401-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-11 9:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-11 9:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-08-11 9:28 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fcooper-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-xBCQruHUn5ppWr+L1FloEB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ssantosh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.