From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
"Seungwon Jeon"
<tgih.jun-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Jaehoon Chung"
<jh80.chung-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Ulf Hansson"
<ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"Maxime Ripard"
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
"David Lanzendörfer"
<david.lanzendoerfer-Z7Kmv9EsliU@public.gmane.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 12-08-15 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When core does not set the MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING flag enable
> automatic hardware controlled clock gating on the mmc interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
In general this looks good, but I wonder how intensively this has
been tested ? Also given the long latencies when using manual
clock on/off support, have you done any testing to check what
sort of latencies this adds, e.g. Both with and without
the patch, dump all the filesystem caches:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
And then do:
time cat /some/small/file/on/the/sdcard
Do this at least 3 time both with and without the patch, and see
if there are any noticable differences ?
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index f808a02..443cab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -601,8 +601,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
> rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> rval &= ~(SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON | SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON);
>
> - if (oclk_en)
> + if (oclk_en) {
> rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
> + if (!host->mmc->card ||
> + !(host->mmc->card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING))
> +
> + rval |= SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON;
> + }
>
> start = jiffies;
> end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 12-08-15 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When core does not set the MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING flag enable
> automatic hardware controlled clock gating on the mmc interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
In general this looks good, but I wonder how intensively this has
been tested ? Also given the long latencies when using manual
clock on/off support, have you done any testing to check what
sort of latencies this adds, e.g. Both with and without
the patch, dump all the filesystem caches:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
And then do:
time cat /some/small/file/on/the/sdcard
Do this at least 3 time both with and without the patch, and see
if there are any noticable differences ?
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index f808a02..443cab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -601,8 +601,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
> rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> rval &= ~(SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON | SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON);
>
> - if (oclk_en)
> + if (oclk_en) {
> rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
> + if (!host->mmc->card ||
> + !(host->mmc->card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING))
> +
> + rval |= SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON;
> + }
>
> start = jiffies;
> end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: hramrach@gmail.com, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
"Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
"Jaehoon Chung" <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"David Lanzendörfer" <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:35:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 12-08-15 14:23, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When core does not set the MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING flag enable
> automatic hardware controlled clock gating on the mmc interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
In general this looks good, but I wonder how intensively this has
been tested ? Also given the long latencies when using manual
clock on/off support, have you done any testing to check what
sort of latencies this adds, e.g. Both with and without
the patch, dump all the filesystem caches:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
And then do:
time cat /some/small/file/on/the/sdcard
Do this at least 3 time both with and without the patch, and see
if there are any noticable differences ?
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index f808a02..443cab5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -601,8 +601,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
> rval = mmc_readl(host, REG_CLKCR);
> rval &= ~(SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON | SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON);
>
> - if (oclk_en)
> + if (oclk_en) {
> rval |= SDXC_CARD_CLOCK_ON;
> + if (!host->mmc->card ||
> + !(host->mmc->card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING))
> +
> + rval |= SDXC_LOW_POWER_ON;
> + }
>
> start = jiffies;
> end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(750);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 12:10 [PATCH 0/3] misc MMC fixes Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:10 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <cover.1439381423.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: simplify the SDMMC_CLKEN_LOW_PWR logic Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:23 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <3d03bfe2c18789eefa038018467c9c63c94ae4a2.1439381423.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-17 1:55 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 1:55 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 1:55 ` Jaehoon Chung
[not found] ` <55D13F07.70309-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-17 5:52 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 5:52 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 5:52 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 11:26 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 11:26 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-08-17 14:42 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-17 14:42 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-17 14:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 14:55 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-17 16:21 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-17 16:21 ` Alim Akhtar
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: sunxi: use controller automatic clock gating Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:23 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <c33b221f9b622e3bad9d855a7ad1887b82827244.1439381423.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 12:35 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-08-12 12:35 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:35 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <55CB3D92.6040403-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 12:53 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:53 ` [linux-sunxi] " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 12:53 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:19 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:19 ` [linux-sunxi] " Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 13:19 ` Olliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <55CB47D8.4010207-dxLnbx3+1qmEVqv0pETR8A@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:37 ` [linux-sunxi] " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:37 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <CAOMqctSdkPgDfBCNsGNsNnoh4GqVW59oZC3q9HX3gY_NneMPKw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 14:57 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 14:57 ` [linux-sunxi] " Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 14:57 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 12:23 ` [PATCH resend 1/3] mmc: sunxi: fix timeout in sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff michal.suchanek
2015-08-12 12:23 ` michal.suchanek at ruk.cuni.cz
[not found] ` <7f9c6f99b31702c02436ef3356b3ebffa4754260.1439381423.git.hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 12:32 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:32 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 12:32 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <55CB3CD7.2050200-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 12:40 ` Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 12:40 ` [linux-sunxi] " Olliver Schinagl
2015-08-12 12:40 ` Olliver Schinagl
[not found] ` <55CB3ED4.9000201-dxLnbx3+1qmEVqv0pETR8A@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-12 13:04 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:04 ` [linux-sunxi] " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:04 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 " Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 13:29 ` Michal Suchanek
2015-08-12 14:49 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-08-12 14:49 ` Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <55CB5CE6.1000303-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-25 12:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-08-25 12:06 ` [linux-sunxi] " Ulf Hansson
2015-08-25 12:06 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB3D92.6040403@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david.lanzendoerfer-Z7Kmv9EsliU@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jh80.chung-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tgih.jun-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.