From: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
To: "Richard Weinberger" <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
"Andreas Grünbacher" <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>
Cc: <snijsure@grid-net.com>, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
<ben.shelton@ni.com>, <terry.wilcox@ni.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<mkl@pengutronix.de>, <gratian.crisan@ni.com>,
<brad.mouring@ni.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel.org bug 103071] Dead "security.*" xattr code in ubifs
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:37:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D3DDD1.8060405@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D3D6BB.3030307@huawei.com>
On 8/19/2015 9:07 AM, Sheng Yong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/19/2015 4:55 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Andreas,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Andreas Grünbacher
>> <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> FYI, I've filed the following bug report against ubifs:
>>>
>>>> ubifs sets sb->s_xattr to ubifs_xattr_handlers which contains a handler for
>>>> "security.*" xattrs. The s_xattr handlers are never used because ubifs uses
>>>> its own ubifs_{get,set,list,remove}xattr inode operations instead of
>>>> generic_{get,set,list,remove}xattr inode operations though.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103071
>>
>> Thanks for reporting.
My bad for didn't reply at the right line :(
> This is because UBIFS did not implement extended attribute in the geneirc way
> (by calling generic_*xattr()). We could create an xattr_handler to have these
> dead functions called (in fact, I did that), but doing this seems just another
> encapsulation and makes no sense. So I think we could remove these dead code
> directly.
>
> thanks,
> Sheng
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-19 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 12:15 [kernel.org bug 103071] Dead "security.*" xattr code in ubifs Andreas Grünbacher
2015-08-18 20:55 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-19 1:07 ` Sheng Yong
2015-08-19 1:37 ` Sheng Yong [this message]
2015-08-19 6:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-19 7:36 ` Sheng Yong
2015-08-19 7:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-08-20 9:32 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2015-08-20 0:50 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-20 1:01 ` [PATCH] fstests: link .out to correct output when we set USE_ATTR_SECURE=yes Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-20 1:01 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-20 6:18 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2015-08-20 21:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-20 21:17 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2015-08-21 0:36 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-21 0:36 ` Dongsheng Yang
2015-08-20 6:49 ` [kernel.org bug 103071] Dead "security.*" xattr code in ubifs Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D3DDD1.8060405@huawei.com \
--to=shengyong1@huawei.com \
--cc=andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com \
--cc=ben.shelton@ni.com \
--cc=brad.mouring@ni.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=gratian.crisan@ni.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=snijsure@grid-net.com \
--cc=terry.wilcox@ni.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.