All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory-hotplug: remove reset_node_managed_pages() and reset_node_managed_pages() in hotadd_new_pgdat()
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:28:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D9A036.7060506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C9A554.4090509@huawei.com>

Hi Shi,

Sorry for the late reply. I hope it won't be too late.

NON-ACK by me, I think.

I noticed that your first has been merged. But it won't fix the problem
these code intended to fix.

After your patch 1, zone's spanned/present won't be set to 0 because:

free_area_init_node()
  |--> get_pfn_range_for_nid(&start_pfn, &end_pfn)
  |--> calculate_node_totalpages(pgdat, start_pfn, end_pfn, ...)
          | --> zone_spanned_pages_in_node()
                   | --> if (!node_start_pfn && !node_end_pfn) return 
0;    --------    false, won't return 0
          | --> zone_absent_pages_in_node()
                   | --> if (!node_start_pfn && !node_end_pfn) return 
0;    --------    false, won't return 0

This is caused by a little bug in your patch 1.

You should put memblock_add_node(start, size, nid) before 
hotadd_new_pgdat()
because:

hotadd_new_pgdat()
  | --> free_area_init_node()
           | --> get_pfn_range_for_nid()
                    | --> find memory ranges in memblock.

| --> memblock_add_node(start, size, nid) -------------------    if you 
add it here, it doesn't work.

The result will be like below if we hotadd node 5.
[ 2007.577000] Initmem setup node 5 [mem 
0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
[ 2007.584000] On node 5 totalpages: 0
[ 2007.585000] Built 5 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping on.  
Total pages: 32588823
[ 2007.594000] Policy zone: Normal
[ 2007.598000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x60000000000-0x607ffffffff]


And also, if we merge this patch, /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/meminfo 
will break.


Since this patch is not merged, I think let's just drop it.

And about the little bug in your patch 1, since I'm in a hurry, I have 
already send a patch to fix it.


Thanks. :)


On 08/11/2015 03:33 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> After hotadd_new_pgdat()->free_area_init_node(), the pgdat and zone's spanned/present
> are both 0, so remove reset_node_managed_pages() and reset_node_managed_pages().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
> ---
>   mm/memory_hotplug.c | 25 -------------------------
>   1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 11f26cc..997dfad 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1065,16 +1065,6 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int online_typ
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE */
>   
> -static void reset_node_present_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> -{
> -	struct zone *z;
> -
> -	for (z = pgdat->node_zones; z < pgdat->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES; z++)
> -		z->present_pages = 0;
> -
> -	pgdat->node_present_pages = 0;
> -}
> -
>   /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>   static pg_data_t __ref *hotadd_new_pgdat(int nid, u64 start)
>   {
> @@ -1109,21 +1099,6 @@ static pg_data_t __ref *hotadd_new_pgdat(int nid, u64 start)
>   	build_all_zonelists(pgdat, NULL);
>   	mutex_unlock(&zonelists_mutex);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * zone->managed_pages is set to an approximate value in
> -	 * free_area_init_core(), which will cause
> -	 * /sys/device/system/node/nodeX/meminfo has wrong data.
> -	 * So reset it to 0 before any memory is onlined.
> -	 */
> -	reset_node_managed_pages(pgdat);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * When memory is hot-added, all the memory is in offline state. So
> -	 * clear all zones' present_pages because they will be updated in
> -	 * online_pages() and offline_pages().
> -	 */
> -	reset_node_present_pages(pgdat);
> -
>   	return pgdat;
>   }
>   

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory-hotplug: remove reset_node_managed_pages() and reset_node_managed_pages() in hotadd_new_pgdat()
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:28:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D9A036.7060506@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C9A554.4090509@huawei.com>

Hi Shi,

Sorry for the late reply. I hope it won't be too late.

NON-ACK by me, I think.

I noticed that your first has been merged. But it won't fix the problem
these code intended to fix.

After your patch 1, zone's spanned/present won't be set to 0 because:

free_area_init_node()
  |--> get_pfn_range_for_nid(&start_pfn, &end_pfn)
  |--> calculate_node_totalpages(pgdat, start_pfn, end_pfn, ...)
          | --> zone_spanned_pages_in_node()
                   | --> if (!node_start_pfn && !node_end_pfn) return 
0;    --------    false, won't return 0
          | --> zone_absent_pages_in_node()
                   | --> if (!node_start_pfn && !node_end_pfn) return 
0;    --------    false, won't return 0

This is caused by a little bug in your patch 1.

You should put memblock_add_node(start, size, nid) before 
hotadd_new_pgdat()
because:

hotadd_new_pgdat()
  | --> free_area_init_node()
           | --> get_pfn_range_for_nid()
                    | --> find memory ranges in memblock.

| --> memblock_add_node(start, size, nid) -------------------    if you 
add it here, it doesn't work.

The result will be like below if we hotadd node 5.
[ 2007.577000] Initmem setup node 5 [mem 
0x0000000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff]
[ 2007.584000] On node 5 totalpages: 0
[ 2007.585000] Built 5 zonelists in Node order, mobility grouping on.  
Total pages: 32588823
[ 2007.594000] Policy zone: Normal
[ 2007.598000] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x60000000000-0x607ffffffff]


And also, if we merge this patch, /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/meminfo 
will break.


Since this patch is not merged, I think let's just drop it.

And about the little bug in your patch 1, since I'm in a hurry, I have 
already send a patch to fix it.


Thanks. :)


On 08/11/2015 03:33 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> After hotadd_new_pgdat()->free_area_init_node(), the pgdat and zone's spanned/present
> are both 0, so remove reset_node_managed_pages() and reset_node_managed_pages().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
> ---
>   mm/memory_hotplug.c | 25 -------------------------
>   1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 11f26cc..997dfad 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1065,16 +1065,6 @@ int __ref online_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, int online_typ
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE */
>   
> -static void reset_node_present_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> -{
> -	struct zone *z;
> -
> -	for (z = pgdat->node_zones; z < pgdat->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES; z++)
> -		z->present_pages = 0;
> -
> -	pgdat->node_present_pages = 0;
> -}
> -
>   /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
>   static pg_data_t __ref *hotadd_new_pgdat(int nid, u64 start)
>   {
> @@ -1109,21 +1099,6 @@ static pg_data_t __ref *hotadd_new_pgdat(int nid, u64 start)
>   	build_all_zonelists(pgdat, NULL);
>   	mutex_unlock(&zonelists_mutex);
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * zone->managed_pages is set to an approximate value in
> -	 * free_area_init_core(), which will cause
> -	 * /sys/device/system/node/nodeX/meminfo has wrong data.
> -	 * So reset it to 0 before any memory is onlined.
> -	 */
> -	reset_node_managed_pages(pgdat);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * When memory is hot-added, all the memory is in offline state. So
> -	 * clear all zones' present_pages because they will be updated in
> -	 * online_pages() and offline_pages().
> -	 */
> -	reset_node_present_pages(pgdat);
> -
>   	return pgdat;
>   }
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-23 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-11  7:26 [PATCH 1/2] memory-hotplug: fix wrong edge when hot add a new node Xishi Qiu
2015-08-11  7:26 ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-11  7:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] memory-hotplug: remove reset_node_managed_pages() and reset_node_managed_pages() in hotadd_new_pgdat() Xishi Qiu
2015-08-11  7:33   ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-23 10:28   ` Tang Chen [this message]
2015-08-23 10:28     ` Tang Chen
2015-08-24  9:17     ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-24  9:17       ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-24  9:39       ` Tang Chen
2015-08-24  9:39         ` Tang Chen
2015-08-24 11:24         ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-24 11:24           ` Xishi Qiu
2015-08-26  7:19           ` Tang Chen
2015-08-26  7:19             ` Tang Chen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-17  7:14 Xishi Qiu
2015-04-17  7:14 ` Xishi Qiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55D9A036.7060506@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.