All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vivek Natarajan <nataraja@qti.qualcomm.com>, kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Drop probe responses when too many are queued
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:31:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E48151.9080609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441019095-2364-1-git-send-email-nataraja@qti.qualcomm.com>



On 08/31/2015 04:04 AM, Vivek Natarajan wrote:
> In a noisy environment, when multiple interfaces are created,
> the management tx descriptors are fully occupied by the probe
> responses from all the interfaces. This prevents a new station
> from a successful association.
>
> Fix this by limiting the probe responses when the specified
> threshold limit is reached.

Is this useful when firmware supports management-tx over HTT (instead of WMI)?

Or just for WMI mgt?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Vivek Natarajan <nataraja@qti.qualcomm.com>, kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Drop probe responses when too many are queued
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:31:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E48151.9080609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441019095-2364-1-git-send-email-nataraja@qti.qualcomm.com>



On 08/31/2015 04:04 AM, Vivek Natarajan wrote:
> In a noisy environment, when multiple interfaces are created,
> the management tx descriptors are fully occupied by the probe
> responses from all the interfaces. This prevents a new station
> from a successful association.
>
> Fix this by limiting the probe responses when the specified
> threshold limit is reached.

Is this useful when firmware supports management-tx over HTT (instead of WMI)?

Or just for WMI mgt?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-31 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-31 11:04 [PATCH] ath10k: Drop probe responses when too many are queued Vivek Natarajan
2015-08-31 11:04 ` Vivek Natarajan
2015-08-31 16:31 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-08-31 16:31   ` Ben Greear
2015-09-01  5:22   ` Natarajan, Vivekanandan
2015-09-01  5:22     ` Natarajan, Vivekanandan
2015-09-09  9:37 ` Kalle Valo
2015-09-09  9:37   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E48151.9080609@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nataraja@qti.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.