From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: don't load 32-bit binaries if platform has no aarch32_el0
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5E349.4080802@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901160426.GB16430@leverpostej>
On 01/09/15 17:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Yury Norov wrote:
>> Kernel option COMPAT defines the ability of executing aarch32 binaries.
>> Some platforms does not support aarch32 mode, and so cannot execute that
>> binaries. But we cannot just disable COMPAT for them because the same
>> kernel binary may be used by multiple platforms.
>>
>> In this patch, system_supports_aarch32_el0() is introduced to detect
>> aarch32 support at run-time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 6 ++++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> index 20cdc26..d24ea15 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void check_local_cpu_errata(void);
>> void check_local_cpu_features(void);
>> bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
>> bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
>> +bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> index faad6df..461897b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> /*
>> * ELF register definitions..
>> */
>> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/user.h>
>>
>> @@ -173,8 +174,9 @@ typedef compat_elf_greg_t compat_elf_gregset_t[COMPAT_ELF_NGREG];
>>
>> /* AArch32 EABI. */
>> #define EF_ARM_EABI_MASK 0xff000000
>> -#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) && \
>> - ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))
>> +#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (system_supports_aarch32_el0() \
>> + && ((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) \
>> + && ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))
>>
>> #define compat_start_thread compat_start_thread
>> #define COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(ex) set_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> index 75d5a86..95d953f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void)
>> return mixed_endian_el0;
>> }
>>
>> +#define AARCH64 1
>> +#define AARCH32_64 2
>
> These should be better namespaced. Perhaps ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_64 and
> ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_6432 ?
>
>> +bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void)
>> +{
>> + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
>> + u64 arm64_el0 = info->reg_id_aa64pfr0 & 0xf;
>> + return arm64_el0 == AARCH32_64;
>> +}
>
> We should handle this the same way as we do for endianness support and
> check that all CPUs support AArch32, and set a global flag, rather than
> assuming that all CPUs are symmetric. Likewise for any other feature we
> have to dynamically detect.
Correct. With my series, which I will post after the merge window, we should be able to
define this as a CPU capability and check that bit instead, which would give us a system
wide value.
Suzuki
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: don't load 32-bit binaries if platform has no aarch32_el0
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:41:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5E349.4080802@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901160426.GB16430@leverpostej>
On 01/09/15 17:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Yury Norov wrote:
>> Kernel option COMPAT defines the ability of executing aarch32 binaries.
>> Some platforms does not support aarch32 mode, and so cannot execute that
>> binaries. But we cannot just disable COMPAT for them because the same
>> kernel binary may be used by multiple platforms.
>>
>> In this patch, system_supports_aarch32_el0() is introduced to detect
>> aarch32 support at run-time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 6 ++++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> index 20cdc26..d24ea15 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ void check_local_cpu_errata(void);
>> void check_local_cpu_features(void);
>> bool cpu_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
>> bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void);
>> +bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> index faad6df..461897b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> /*
>> * ELF register definitions..
>> */
>> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/user.h>
>>
>> @@ -173,8 +174,9 @@ typedef compat_elf_greg_t compat_elf_gregset_t[COMPAT_ELF_NGREG];
>>
>> /* AArch32 EABI. */
>> #define EF_ARM_EABI_MASK 0xff000000
>> -#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) && \
>> - ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))
>> +#define compat_elf_check_arch(x) (system_supports_aarch32_el0() \
>> + && ((x)->e_machine == EM_ARM) \
>> + && ((x)->e_flags & EF_ARM_EABI_MASK))
>>
>> #define compat_start_thread compat_start_thread
>> #define COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(ex) set_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> index 75d5a86..95d953f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
>> @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void)
>> return mixed_endian_el0;
>> }
>>
>> +#define AARCH64 1
>> +#define AARCH32_64 2
>
> These should be better namespaced. Perhaps ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_64 and
> ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0_6432 ?
>
>> +bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void)
>> +{
>> + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
>> + u64 arm64_el0 = info->reg_id_aa64pfr0 & 0xf;
>> + return arm64_el0 == AARCH32_64;
>> +}
>
> We should handle this the same way as we do for endianness support and
> check that all CPUs support AArch32, and set a global flag, rather than
> assuming that all CPUs are symmetric. Likewise for any other feature we
> have to dynamically detect.
Correct. With my series, which I will post after the merge window, we should be able to
define this as a CPU capability and check that bit instead, which would give us a system
wide value.
Suzuki
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 14:41 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: introduce run-time detection of aarch32 support Yury Norov
2015-09-01 14:41 ` Yury Norov
2015-09-01 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: cpufeature.h: resolve hidden header dependencies Yury Norov
2015-09-01 14:41 ` Yury Norov
2015-09-01 16:02 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-01 16:02 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-01 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: don't load 32-bit binaries if platform has no aarch32_el0 Yury Norov
2015-09-01 14:41 ` Yury Norov
2015-09-01 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-01 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-01 17:41 ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-09-01 17:41 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-01 17:44 ` Yury
2015-09-01 17:44 ` Yury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E5E349.4080802@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.