From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem_get() return a pointer
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:50:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5E560.6080507@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901045055.GA13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net>
On 08/31/2015 09:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 18:41 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> This is on top of the smd and smem big endian support.
>>
> How sneaky of you, then we need to approve those patches before we
> add new consumers of this API...
I was being explicit to remove any subterfuge. I actually rebased this
to the end of the series, so I suspect it will apply fine without the
big endian stuff. This was mostly making a note that I tested this on
top of those commits.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem_get() return a pointer
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:50:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E5E560.6080507@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150901045055.GA13472@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net>
On 08/31/2015 09:50 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 31 Aug 18:41 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> This is on top of the smd and smem big endian support.
>>
> How sneaky of you, then we need to approve those patches before we
> add new consumers of this API...
I was being explicit to remove any subterfuge. I actually rebased this
to the end of the series, so I suspect it will apply fine without the
big endian stuff. This was mostly making a note that I tested this on
top of those commits.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 1:41 [PATCH] soc: qcom: Make qcom_smem_get() return a pointer Stephen Boyd
2015-09-01 1:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-01 4:50 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-09-01 4:50 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-09-01 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-09-01 17:50 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E5E560.6080507@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.