All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
	shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] spi: rockchip: modify DMA max burst to 1
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:03:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E8DFCE.5040504@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150903174502.GI5313@sirena.org.uk>

On 2015/9/4 1:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:41:43PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> On 2015/9/3 20:54, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> If this is a quirk of the DMA controller why is it being fixed with a
>>> property specific to the SPI controller?  Can't the DMA controller just
>>> override the burst size?
>
>> Cool...that's a good question. Actually DMA controller can't do that since
>> block peripheral controller(e.g sd/emmc, they always access data by
>> block-512Bytes.) can't meet the case. So It's hard for dma controller know
>> who is the caller, and what should be done.
>
> You could take a guess based on request size, but that's going to be a
> bit error prone I imagine.
>

yes, not always cover all cases.

>> The only thing dma controller can do is avoid to execute DMAFLUSHP on its
>> own. But how about peripheral controller trigger non-multiple access? So
>> that's what I mentioned on covery letter that we should do "broken things"
>> for both dma controller and some peripherals.
>
> The other thing it could do is provide the information out via some
> internal Linux API which the drivers could query instead of directly
> having a DT property in each client driver.  That way at least the DT
> only needs the quirk in one place even if the clients need to handle it
> individually.

Good idea. Thanks, Mark.

>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com (Shawn Lin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/9] spi: rockchip: modify DMA max burst to 1
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:03:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E8DFCE.5040504@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150903174502.GI5313@sirena.org.uk>

On 2015/9/4 1:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:41:43PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> On 2015/9/3 20:54, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> If this is a quirk of the DMA controller why is it being fixed with a
>>> property specific to the SPI controller?  Can't the DMA controller just
>>> override the burst size?
>
>> Cool...that's a good question. Actually DMA controller can't do that since
>> block peripheral controller(e.g sd/emmc, they always access data by
>> block-512Bytes.) can't meet the case. So It's hard for dma controller know
>> who is the caller, and what should be done.
>
> You could take a guess based on request size, but that's going to be a
> bit error prone I imagine.
>

yes, not always cover all cases.

>> The only thing dma controller can do is avoid to execute DMAFLUSHP on its
>> own. But how about peripheral controller trigger non-multiple access? So
>> that's what I mentioned on covery letter that we should do "broken things"
>> for both dma controller and some peripherals.
>
> The other thing it could do is provide the information out via some
> internal Linux API which the drivers could query instead of directly
> having a DT property in each client driver.  That way at least the DT
> only needs the quirk in one place even if the clients need to handle it
> individually.

Good idea. Thanks, Mark.

>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@google.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
	Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>,
	dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] spi: rockchip: modify DMA max burst to 1
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:03:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E8DFCE.5040504@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150903174502.GI5313@sirena.org.uk>

On 2015/9/4 1:45, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:41:43PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> On 2015/9/3 20:54, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> If this is a quirk of the DMA controller why is it being fixed with a
>>> property specific to the SPI controller?  Can't the DMA controller just
>>> override the burst size?
>
>> Cool...that's a good question. Actually DMA controller can't do that since
>> block peripheral controller(e.g sd/emmc, they always access data by
>> block-512Bytes.) can't meet the case. So It's hard for dma controller know
>> who is the caller, and what should be done.
>
> You could take a guess based on request size, but that's going to be a
> bit error prone I imagine.
>

yes, not always cover all cases.

>> The only thing dma controller can do is avoid to execute DMAFLUSHP on its
>> own. But how about peripheral controller trigger non-multiple access? So
>> that's what I mentioned on covery letter that we should do "broken things"
>> for both dma controller and some peripherals.
>
> The other thing it could do is provide the information out via some
> internal Linux API which the drivers could query instead of directly
> having a DT property in each client driver.  That way at least the DT
> only needs the quirk in one place even if the clients need to handle it
> individually.

Good idea. Thanks, Mark.

>


-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-01  9:56 [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:56 ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:56 ` Shawn Lin
     [not found] ` <1441101381-1329-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-01  9:56   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] DMA: pl330: support burst mode for dev-to-mem and mem-to-dev transmit Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:56     ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:56     ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] Documentation: spi-rockchip: add description of rockchip,spi-broken-burst-len Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57     ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57     ` [PATCH v3 3/9] Documentation: spi-rockchip: add description of rockchip, spi-broken-burst-len Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] ASoC: rockchip_i2s: modify DMA max burst to 1 Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:59     ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:59     ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Documentation: arm-pl330: add description of arm,pl330-broken-no-flushp Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] Documentation: arm-pl330: add description of arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] Documentation: rockchip-i2s: add description of rockchip,i2s-broken-burst-len Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] Documentation: rockchip-i2s: add description of rockchip, i2s-broken-burst-len Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] DMA: pl330: add quirk for broken no flushp Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57   ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] ARM: dts: Add arm,pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:57   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp " Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] ARM: dts: Add arm,pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:58   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp " Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] spi: rockchip: modify DMA max burst to 1 Shawn Lin
2015-09-01  9:58   ` Shawn Lin
     [not found]   ` <1441101524-1700-1-git-send-email-shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-03 12:54     ` Mark Brown
2015-09-03 12:54       ` Mark Brown
2015-09-03 12:54       ` Mark Brown
     [not found]       ` <20150903125429.GA12027-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-03 13:41         ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-03 13:41           ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-03 13:41           ` Shawn Lin
     [not found]           ` <55E84E17.2090409-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-03 17:45             ` Mark Brown
2015-09-03 17:45               ` Mark Brown
2015-09-03 17:45               ` Mark Brown
2015-09-04  0:03               ` Shawn Lin [this message]
2015-09-04  0:03                 ` Shawn Lin
2015-09-04  0:03                 ` Shawn Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55E8DFCE.5040504@rock-chips.com \
    --to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=addy.ke@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=olofj@google.com \
    --cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.