All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: silk: add SDHI1 DT support
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 23:47:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EA2D8D.90004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150902022936.GA18115@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 09/02/2015 05:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>>> Define the SILK board dependent part of the SDHI1 (connected to micro-SD slot)
>>>>> device nodes along with the necessary voltage regulators.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the original patch by Vladimir Barinov
>>>>> <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch is against 'renesas-devel-20150810-v4.2-rc6' tag of Simon Horman's
>>>>> 'renesas.git' repo plus the R8A7794/SILK QSPI patches just re-posted. It needs
>>>>> the R8A7794 GPIO patches in order to compile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in version 2:
>>>>> - removed not working SDHI0 stuff, renamed the patch;
>>>>> - replaced SDHI1's "wp-gpios" property with "disable-wp".
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if you could explain the motivation for the "disable-wp"
>>>> update
>>>
>>>     Please see the comment in mmc_sd_get_ro().
>>>
>>>> and weather it is appropriate for other r8a779* dts files.
>>>
>>>     In case of micro-SD slots, yes.
>>
>>     The MMC binding document says it should only be specified if the
>> controller has WP detection logic. We, so far, seem to have been replying on
>> the GPIOs despite this logic is present (according to the R-Car gen2 SDHI
>> manuals I have). The driver will first call mmc_gpio_get_ro() and when that
>> fails due to "wp-gpios" not being specified, it proceeds to reading the
>> register but that is forbidden by TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE flag set for
>> the R-Car gen1/2 chips, so 0 is always returned from tmio_mmc_get_ro().
>> There seems to be no point in going that far (and doing the runtime PM
>> dances) --

    Alternatively, the driver could be fixed to check the flag before the RPM 
call unlike what it does now.

>> and MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT (set when "disable-wp" is specified) prohibits
>> doing that...
>
> That sounds reasonable to me.

    I'm still wondering why TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is set for the R-Car 
SoCs. Morimoto-san, any comments? Your change logs are too terse. :-)

> Some more questions from my side:

> * What is the status of this patch

    Tested, working.

> * Can you prepare patches for r8a779* dts files for micro-SD slots?

    Ugh, I probably can but won't promise anything.

MBR, Sergei


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: silk: add SDHI1 DT support
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 02:47:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EA2D8D.90004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150902022936.GA18115@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 09/02/2015 05:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>>> Define the SILK board dependent part of the SDHI1 (connected to micro-SD slot)
>>>>> device nodes along with the necessary voltage regulators.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the original patch by Vladimir Barinov
>>>>> <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch is against 'renesas-devel-20150810-v4.2-rc6' tag of Simon Horman's
>>>>> 'renesas.git' repo plus the R8A7794/SILK QSPI patches just re-posted. It needs
>>>>> the R8A7794 GPIO patches in order to compile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in version 2:
>>>>> - removed not working SDHI0 stuff, renamed the patch;
>>>>> - replaced SDHI1's "wp-gpios" property with "disable-wp".
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if you could explain the motivation for the "disable-wp"
>>>> update
>>>
>>>     Please see the comment in mmc_sd_get_ro().
>>>
>>>> and weather it is appropriate for other r8a779* dts files.
>>>
>>>     In case of micro-SD slots, yes.
>>
>>     The MMC binding document says it should only be specified if the
>> controller has WP detection logic. We, so far, seem to have been replying on
>> the GPIOs despite this logic is present (according to the R-Car gen2 SDHI
>> manuals I have). The driver will first call mmc_gpio_get_ro() and when that
>> fails due to "wp-gpios" not being specified, it proceeds to reading the
>> register but that is forbidden by TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE flag set for
>> the R-Car gen1/2 chips, so 0 is always returned from tmio_mmc_get_ro().
>> There seems to be no point in going that far (and doing the runtime PM
>> dances) --

    Alternatively, the driver could be fixed to check the flag before the RPM 
call unlike what it does now.

>> and MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT (set when "disable-wp" is specified) prohibits
>> doing that...
>
> That sounds reasonable to me.

    I'm still wondering why TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is set for the R-Car 
SoCs. Morimoto-san, any comments? Your change logs are too terse. :-)

> Some more questions from my side:

> * What is the status of this patch

    Tested, working.

> * Can you prepare patches for r8a779* dts files for micro-SD slots?

    Ugh, I probably can but won't promise anything.

MBR, Sergei

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
	galak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	magnus.damm@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: silk: add SDHI1 DT support
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 02:47:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EA2D8D.90004@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150902022936.GA18115@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 09/02/2015 05:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:

>>>>> Define the SILK board dependent part of the SDHI1 (connected to micro-SD slot)
>>>>> device nodes along with the necessary voltage regulators.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the original patch by Vladimir Barinov
>>>>> <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch is against 'renesas-devel-20150810-v4.2-rc6' tag of Simon Horman's
>>>>> 'renesas.git' repo plus the R8A7794/SILK QSPI patches just re-posted. It needs
>>>>> the R8A7794 GPIO patches in order to compile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in version 2:
>>>>> - removed not working SDHI0 stuff, renamed the patch;
>>>>> - replaced SDHI1's "wp-gpios" property with "disable-wp".
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if you could explain the motivation for the "disable-wp"
>>>> update
>>>
>>>     Please see the comment in mmc_sd_get_ro().
>>>
>>>> and weather it is appropriate for other r8a779* dts files.
>>>
>>>     In case of micro-SD slots, yes.
>>
>>     The MMC binding document says it should only be specified if the
>> controller has WP detection logic. We, so far, seem to have been replying on
>> the GPIOs despite this logic is present (according to the R-Car gen2 SDHI
>> manuals I have). The driver will first call mmc_gpio_get_ro() and when that
>> fails due to "wp-gpios" not being specified, it proceeds to reading the
>> register but that is forbidden by TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE flag set for
>> the R-Car gen1/2 chips, so 0 is always returned from tmio_mmc_get_ro().
>> There seems to be no point in going that far (and doing the runtime PM
>> dances) --

    Alternatively, the driver could be fixed to check the flag before the RPM 
call unlike what it does now.

>> and MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT (set when "disable-wp" is specified) prohibits
>> doing that...
>
> That sounds reasonable to me.

    I'm still wondering why TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is set for the R-Car 
SoCs. Morimoto-san, any comments? Your change logs are too terse. :-)

> Some more questions from my side:

> * What is the status of this patch

    Tested, working.

> * Can you prepare patches for r8a779* dts files for micro-SD slots?

    Ugh, I probably can but won't promise anything.

MBR, Sergei


  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-21 22:25 [PATCH 0/2] Add R8A7794/SILK board SDHI DT support Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7794: add " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:26   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:26   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-23  0:28   ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-02-23  0:28     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-02-23  0:28     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-02-23 11:18     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 11:18       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 11:18       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 11:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 11:16     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 11:16     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-23 22:00     ` Simon Horman
2015-02-23 22:00       ` Simon Horman
2015-02-23 22:00       ` Simon Horman
2015-02-21 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: shmobile: silk: add SDHI0/1 " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:27   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-21 22:27   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-22  0:45   ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-22  0:45     ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-22  0:45     ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-22 14:54     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-22 14:54       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-22 14:54       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-23 22:01       ` Simon Horman
2015-02-23 22:01         ` Simon Horman
2015-02-23 22:01         ` Simon Horman
2015-02-24  4:28       ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-24  4:28         ` Magnus Damm
2015-02-24  4:28         ` Magnus Damm
2015-08-10 22:44 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: shmobile: silk: add SDHI1 " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-10 22:44   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-10 22:44   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-12  1:26   ` Simon Horman
2015-08-12  1:26     ` Simon Horman
2015-08-12  1:26     ` Simon Horman
2015-08-21 20:57     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-21 20:57       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-21 20:57       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-21 22:18       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-21 22:18         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-21 22:18         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-02  2:29         ` Simon Horman
2015-09-02  2:29           ` Simon Horman
2015-09-02  2:29           ` Simon Horman
2015-09-04 23:47           ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2015-09-04 23:47             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-04 23:47             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-18  0:21             ` Simon Horman
2015-09-18  0:21               ` Simon Horman
2015-09-18  0:21               ` Simon Horman
2015-09-18  2:56               ` Magnus Damm
2015-09-18  2:56                 ` Magnus Damm
2015-09-18  2:56                 ` Magnus Damm
2015-09-22 23:19                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-22 23:19                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-22 23:19                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-29  8:44                   ` Magnus Damm
2015-09-29  8:44                     ` Magnus Damm
2015-09-29  8:44                     ` Magnus Damm
2015-10-06 20:12                     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-06 20:12                       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-06 20:12                       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-22 23:22               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-22 23:22                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-09-22 23:22                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-13 22:47   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-13 22:47     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-08-13 22:47     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-16 21:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-16 21:37   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-16 21:37   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-18 11:04   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-18 11:04     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-18 11:04     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-19  0:46     ` Simon Horman
2015-10-19  0:46       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-19  0:46       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-20 17:58       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-20 17:58         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-20 17:58         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21  0:31         ` Simon Horman
2015-10-21  0:31           ` Simon Horman
2015-10-21  0:31           ` Simon Horman
2015-10-21 18:13           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 18:13             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 18:13             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-22  0:54             ` Simon Horman
2015-10-22  0:54               ` Simon Horman
2015-10-22  0:54               ` Simon Horman
2015-10-21 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: fix "gpio-ranges" props Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 23:04   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 23:04   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-23  0:19   ` Simon Horman
2015-10-23  0:19     ` Simon Horman
2015-10-23  0:19     ` Simon Horman
2015-10-21 23:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7791: " Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 23:05   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-21 23:05   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-10-22 11:06   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-22 11:06     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-22 11:06     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-23  0:20     ` Simon Horman
2015-10-23  0:20       ` Simon Horman
2015-10-23  0:20       ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55EA2D8D.90004@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.