From: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:00:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EF6875.9000404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EDADF5.5060008@arm.com>
On 09/07/2015 09:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 19/08/15 23:07, Al Stone wrote:
>
> I finally got a chance to try this series on Juno. Well it exposed a firmware
> bug in MADT table :)
What? The code did what it was supposed to do :-)? Very cool. Good to know.
I talked to Graeme a bit, too, and he had some good suggestions for clean up.
I'll post a v3 tomorrow.
> [..]
>
>> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> @@ -245,6 +484,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> table_end) {
>> if (entry->type == entry_id
>> && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
>> + if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Not sure if we can have the above check here unconditionally.
> Currently I can see there are 2 other users of acpi_parse_entries i.e.
> PCC and NUMA. So may be it can be made conditional or return success for
> non-MADT tables from bad_madt_entry ?
I'll double check these uses. I thought I had before, and based on what I
saw the check would be reasonable. It never hurts to check again, though.
> Other than that, you can add for ARM64 specific parts:
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Thanks!
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@redhat.com
-----------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 23:00:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EF6875.9000404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EDADF5.5060008@arm.com>
On 09/07/2015 09:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 19/08/15 23:07, Al Stone wrote:
>
> I finally got a chance to try this series on Juno. Well it exposed a firmware
> bug in MADT table :)
What? The code did what it was supposed to do :-)? Very cool. Good to know.
I talked to Graeme a bit, too, and he had some good suggestions for clean up.
I'll post a v3 tomorrow.
> [..]
>
>> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> @@ -245,6 +484,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> table_end) {
>> if (entry->type = entry_id
>> && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
>> + if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Not sure if we can have the above check here unconditionally.
> Currently I can see there are 2 other users of acpi_parse_entries i.e.
> PCC and NUMA. So may be it can be made conditional or return success for
> non-MADT tables from bad_madt_entry ?
I'll double check these uses. I thought I had before, and based on what I
saw the check would be reasonable. It never hurts to check again, though.
> Other than that, you can add for ARM64 specific parts:
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Thanks!
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@redhat.com
-----------------------------------
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ahs3@redhat.com (Al Stone)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:00:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EF6875.9000404@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EDADF5.5060008@arm.com>
On 09/07/2015 09:32 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 19/08/15 23:07, Al Stone wrote:
>
> I finally got a chance to try this series on Juno. Well it exposed a firmware
> bug in MADT table :)
What? The code did what it was supposed to do :-)? Very cool. Good to know.
I talked to Graeme a bit, too, and he had some good suggestions for clean up.
I'll post a v3 tomorrow.
> [..]
>
>> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> @@ -245,6 +484,8 @@ acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> table_end) {
>> if (entry->type == entry_id
>> && (!max_entries || count < max_entries)) {
>> + if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Not sure if we can have the above check here unconditionally.
> Currently I can see there are 2 other users of acpi_parse_entries i.e.
> PCC and NUMA. So may be it can be made conditional or return success for
> non-MADT tables from bad_madt_entry ?
I'll double check these uses. I thought I had before, and based on what I
saw the check would be reasonable. It never hurts to check again, though.
> Other than that, you can add for ARM64 specific parts:
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Thanks!
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3 at redhat.com
-----------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: Provide better MADT subtable sanity checks Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-26 15:38 ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-26 15:38 ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-26 15:38 ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-26 20:30 ` Al Stone
2015-08-26 20:30 ` Al Stone
2015-08-26 20:30 ` Al Stone
2015-09-07 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-07 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-07 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-08 23:00 ` Al Stone [this message]
2015-09-08 23:00 ` Al Stone
2015-09-08 23:00 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 19:57 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 19:57 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 19:57 ` Al Stone
2015-09-10 16:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-10 16:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-10 16:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-10 20:43 ` Al Stone
2015-09-10 20:43 ` Al Stone
2015-09-10 20:43 ` Al Stone
2015-09-11 8:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-11 8:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-11 8:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI / ARM64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY/BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-20 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-20 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-20 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-20 16:57 ` Al Stone
2015-08-20 16:57 ` Al Stone
2015-08-20 16:57 ` Al Stone
2015-08-24 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-24 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-24 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / IA64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI / X86: " Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: remove definition of BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EF6875.9000404@redhat.com \
--to=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.