From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: jslaby@suse.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] serial: samsung: Fix UART status handling and other fixes
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:23:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F0CD8B.8080403@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55EFF898.7060205@samsung.com>
On 09.09.2015 18:15, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 01:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08.09.2015 18:38, Robert Baldyga wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch set contains three patches: two minor fixes and one quite
>>> important bugfix enabling UART status handling in DMA mode, which was
>>> missing so far. It enables, among others, 'break' contition handling,
>>> which is necessary if we want to use Magic SysRq. So this patch fixes
>>> Magic SysRq handling for serial consoles using UART in DMA mode,
>>
>> Is it even worth using UART for serial console in DMA mode? How many
>> benefits it brings? Anyone measured real data?
>>
>> The patch which enabled DMA for all serial ports on Exynos4 uncovered
>> some issues. That is one benefit... but was it worth it?
>
> Well, UART in DMA mode should work at least as good as in PIO, so there
> is nothing wrong in having serial console configured in DMA. Sure, it
> rather barely reduces number of interrupts while used as typical serial
> console, but in some cases (eg. using zmodem) it can be more profitable.
That's some reason... and mentioned earlier testing of DMA which
uncovered some interesting issues. :)
>
> To be honest, I have no strong feeling about that. I've decided to
> utilize new possibility opened by introducing DMA mode in serial driver,
> so I've send patch enabling it for each port on Exynos4. But if it
> turned out to be unneeded I will not insist on it.
I was just thinking loud... I don't have any data neither so let's go
ahead with serial DMA.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 9:38 [PATCH 0/3] serial: samsung: Fix UART status handling and other fixes Robert Baldyga
2015-09-08 9:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] serial: samsung: remove unused 'irq' parameter Robert Baldyga
2015-09-10 0:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-08 9:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] serial: samsung: remove unneded 'ignore_char' label Robert Baldyga
2015-09-10 0:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-10 10:30 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-09-08 9:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] serial: samsung: Fix UART status handling in DMA mode Robert Baldyga
2015-09-10 0:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-10 10:41 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-09-08 23:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] serial: samsung: Fix UART status handling and other fixes Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-09 9:15 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-09-10 0:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F0CD8B.8080403@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.