From: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
To: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
nico@fluxnic.net, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Subject: sdhci: runtime suspend/resume on card insert/removal
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:40:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F12CF8.50003@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi,
During my testing of SDHCI-PXAV3 driver on Marvell's pxa1928
based platform, I observed that runtime PM suspend/resume is having
issues with card insertion and removal.
Let me try to explain it using execution sequence -
During boot:
MMC SD card gets detected as expected.
[ 2.431012] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address 1234
[ 2.437235] mmcblk1: mmc1:1234 SA04G 3.63 GiB
[ 2.444841] mmcblk1: p1
Now after coming to the linux prompt, if card removal event occurs
then the call sequence is -
sdhci_irq() -->
-> sdhci_thread_irq(): host->thread_isr - 0x80
-> sdhci_card_event()
-> mmc_detect_change()
--> _mmc_detect_change()
---> mmc_sd_detect()
mmc_sd_remove()
mmc_remove_card()
mmc_bus_remove()
mmc_power_off()
mmc_set_initial_state()
sdhci_set_ios()
...
sdhci_pxav3_runtime_suspend()
sdhci_runtime_suspend_host()
Till here everything looks perfect :) (if I got it right)
Now on card insertion again, the expectation is, runtime resume should
get called as part of interrupt trigger from the SDHCI controller on
card insertion.
But what I am observing here is, no interrupt is generated, as it is
not enabled at all. And the reason being sdhci_runtime_suspend_host()
int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
....
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->ier &= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
...
}
In my case, I see SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT is not ON and with above step
we are not ensuring that it is enabled either.
Also we are not enabling card insertion and removal interrupts.
I have done following change to the code -
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 418f381..3129292 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2783,9 +2783,12 @@ int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host
*host)
mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
- host->ier &= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
+
+ host->flags |= SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED;
+ host->ier |= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
synchronize_hardirq(host->irq);
And things started working as expected.
The execution sequence of irq and sdhci_runtime_resume
both looks ok to me.
Card insertion event =
sdhci_irq() -->
-> sdhci_thread_irq: host->thread_isr - 40
--> sdhci_card_event()
--> mmc_detect_change()
---> _mmc_detect_change()
...
-> sdhci_pxav3_runtime_resume()
--> sdhci_do_set_ios:1438
I see card getting enumerated as expected -
[ 15.116098] mmc1: mmc_rescan_try_freq: trying to init card at 400000 Hz
[ 15.356473] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address 1234
[ 15.363962] mmcblk1: mmc1:1234 SA04G 3.63 GiB
[ 15.371043] sdhci_thread_irq:2642 host->thread_isr - 100
[ 15.376492] mmcblk1: p1
I believe (based on my understanding) the change I have done is right.
I am not sure how other platforms using sdhci.c working so far,
probably no runtime_pm support? Not sure though
Please let me know if I am missing something here.
And not, and everyone is ok with this, I will submit the patch fixing
this issue.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: sdhci: runtime suspend/resume on card insert/removal
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:40:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F12CF8.50003@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi,
During my testing of SDHCI-PXAV3 driver on Marvell's pxa1928
based platform, I observed that runtime PM suspend/resume is having
issues with card insertion and removal.
Let me try to explain it using execution sequence -
During boot:
MMC SD card gets detected as expected.
[ 2.431012] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address 1234
[ 2.437235] mmcblk1: mmc1:1234 SA04G 3.63 GiB
[ 2.444841] mmcblk1: p1
Now after coming to the linux prompt, if card removal event occurs
then the call sequence is -
sdhci_irq() -->
-> sdhci_thread_irq(): host->thread_isr - 0x80
-> sdhci_card_event()
-> mmc_detect_change()
--> _mmc_detect_change()
---> mmc_sd_detect()
mmc_sd_remove()
mmc_remove_card()
mmc_bus_remove()
mmc_power_off()
mmc_set_initial_state()
sdhci_set_ios()
...
sdhci_pxav3_runtime_suspend()
sdhci_runtime_suspend_host()
Till here everything looks perfect :) (if I got it right)
Now on card insertion again, the expectation is, runtime resume should
get called as part of interrupt trigger from the SDHCI controller on
card insertion.
But what I am observing here is, no interrupt is generated, as it is
not enabled at all. And the reason being sdhci_runtime_suspend_host()
int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
....
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
host->ier &= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
...
}
In my case, I see SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT is not ON and with above step
we are not ensuring that it is enabled either.
Also we are not enabling card insertion and removal interrupts.
I have done following change to the code -
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 418f381..3129292 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2783,9 +2783,12 @@ int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host
*host)
mmc_retune_needed(host->mmc);
spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
- host->ier &= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
+
+ host->flags |= SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED;
+ host->ier |= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE);
sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
synchronize_hardirq(host->irq);
And things started working as expected.
The execution sequence of irq and sdhci_runtime_resume
both looks ok to me.
Card insertion event =
sdhci_irq() -->
-> sdhci_thread_irq: host->thread_isr - 40
--> sdhci_card_event()
--> mmc_detect_change()
---> _mmc_detect_change()
...
-> sdhci_pxav3_runtime_resume()
--> sdhci_do_set_ios:1438
I see card getting enumerated as expected -
[ 15.116098] mmc1: mmc_rescan_try_freq: trying to init card at 400000 Hz
[ 15.356473] mmc1: new high speed SDHC card at address 1234
[ 15.363962] mmcblk1: mmc1:1234 SA04G 3.63 GiB
[ 15.371043] sdhci_thread_irq:2642 host->thread_isr - 100
[ 15.376492] mmcblk1: p1
I believe (based on my understanding) the change I have done is right.
I am not sure how other platforms using sdhci.c working so far,
probably no runtime_pm support? Not sure though
Please let me know if I am missing something here.
And not, and everyone is ok with this, I will submit the patch fixing
this issue.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 7:10 Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2015-09-10 7:10 ` sdhci: runtime suspend/resume on card insert/removal Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-10 7:31 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-10 7:31 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-10 7:51 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-10 7:51 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-10 7:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-10 7:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-10 8:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-10 8:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-10 8:04 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-10 8:04 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-14 6:25 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 6:25 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 6:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-14 6:28 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-14 8:13 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 8:13 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 8:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-14 8:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-09-14 9:19 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 9:19 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 10:15 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 10:15 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 12:33 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 12:33 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 12:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-14 13:05 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-09-14 13:05 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F12CF8.50003@linaro.org \
--to=vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.