All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chandan@mykolab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/224: Increase filesystem instance size to 1.5 GiB
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:38:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F230A3.2070300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2500094.kBUgEuDpMB@localhost.localdomain>



Chandan Rajendra wrote on 2015/09/01 08:03 +0530:
> On Monday 31 Aug 2015 22:15:10 Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:49:14AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>>> mkfs.btrfs when invoked on small filesystems by "not" specifying any block
>>> sizes (i.e. mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda1) will automatically create filesystem
>>> instance with "data block size" == "metadata block size". However in the
>>> subpagesize-blocksize scenario, we need to specify both data and metadata
>>> block size on the command line (For e.g. mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4096 -n 16384
>>> /dev/sda1). In this case, Since the user is forcing the block sizes and it
>>> is impossible to have mixed block groups with differing data and metadata
>>> block sizes, mkfs.btrfs will fail.
>>
>> Ok, so the issue is that for this particular test configuration, btrfs
>> has a minimum file system size.  What about changing
>> _scratch_mkfs_sized so that if MIN_FS_SIZE is set, the file system
>> created will be at least MIN_FS_SIZE in size.
>>
>> This way it sets the minimum file system size for all tests, not just
>> generic/224, and any test configuration, whether it be ext4, xfs, or
>> btrfs where the data and metadata block size are the same, don't have
>> to take extra time -- only the test configuration of btrfs with
>> data_block_size != metadata_block_size.
>>
> I agree with the approach you have suggested. I will write up a patch and send
> it across the mailing list. Thanks Ted.
>
Hi Chandan,

Although the reply may be a little late, but I think it's still better 
to fix the bug in mkfs.btrfs.

The core problem is, why mkfs.btrfs is insisting on make the fs into 
mixed-bg.

Auto detection for small device and make it into mixed-bg should be a 
"OPTIONAL" feature, not a "mandatory" one.

So IMHO, the best method is to disable mixed-bg when nodesize/sectorsize 
is given and differs and user doesn't force mkfs to create mixed-bg.

Thanks,
Qu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <fstests@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <chandan@mykolab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/224: Increase filesystem instance size to 1.5 GiB
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:38:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F230A3.2070300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2500094.kBUgEuDpMB@localhost.localdomain>



Chandan Rajendra wrote on 2015/09/01 08:03 +0530:
> On Monday 31 Aug 2015 22:15:10 Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:49:14AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>>> mkfs.btrfs when invoked on small filesystems by "not" specifying any block
>>> sizes (i.e. mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda1) will automatically create filesystem
>>> instance with "data block size" == "metadata block size". However in the
>>> subpagesize-blocksize scenario, we need to specify both data and metadata
>>> block size on the command line (For e.g. mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4096 -n 16384
>>> /dev/sda1). In this case, Since the user is forcing the block sizes and it
>>> is impossible to have mixed block groups with differing data and metadata
>>> block sizes, mkfs.btrfs will fail.
>>
>> Ok, so the issue is that for this particular test configuration, btrfs
>> has a minimum file system size.  What about changing
>> _scratch_mkfs_sized so that if MIN_FS_SIZE is set, the file system
>> created will be at least MIN_FS_SIZE in size.
>>
>> This way it sets the minimum file system size for all tests, not just
>> generic/224, and any test configuration, whether it be ext4, xfs, or
>> btrfs where the data and metadata block size are the same, don't have
>> to take extra time -- only the test configuration of btrfs with
>> data_block_size != metadata_block_size.
>>
> I agree with the approach you have suggested. I will write up a patch and send
> it across the mailing list. Thanks Ted.
>
Hi Chandan,

Although the reply may be a little late, but I think it's still better 
to fix the bug in mkfs.btrfs.

The core problem is, why mkfs.btrfs is insisting on make the fs into 
mixed-bg.

Auto detection for small device and make it into mixed-bg should be a 
"OPTIONAL" feature, not a "mandatory" one.

So IMHO, the best method is to disable mixed-bg when nodesize/sectorsize 
is given and differs and user doesn't force mkfs to create mixed-bg.

Thanks,
Qu

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-30 14:46 [PATCH] generic/224: Increase filesystem instance size to 1.5 GiB Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-31 18:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-08-31 19:19   ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-08-31 21:09     ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-09-01  0:19   ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-01  0:38     ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-01  2:15     ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-09-01  2:33       ` Chandan Rajendra
2015-09-11  1:38         ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-09-11  1:38           ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-22  5:18           ` Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F230A3.2070300@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chandan@mykolab.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.