From: nick <xerofoify@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, kgene@kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mach-s3c64xx:Fix error handling for certain calls to s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range in the file dev-audio.c
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:48:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FA29E7.1070902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FA1FEE.5070506@samsung.com>
On 2015-09-16 10:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.09.2015 10:51, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes error handling for calls to the function
>> s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range in the file dev-audio.c that
>> assume calls to this particular function always run
>> successfully to properly check now if these calls
>> fail by returning a error code and if so return it
>> directly to the call of these functions in order for
>> the caller to be able to handle these failed calls in
>> its own error path(s).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c | 12 +++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> I am assuming (from the past events) that you did not test the patch and
> how returning the error condition affects rest of the code. In the same
> time you ignored my request to mark such patches with Request-For-Test.
>
I will resend with a better commit message but testing is really difficult
as that would require me to have a device for all the drivers I am currently
writing for. However I will be glad to put a Request-For-Test and a better
commit message in a v2 to show I didn't write this blindly.
Sorry,
Nick
> Please send it after testing.
>
> Commit message is hard to understand, please re-phrase so it would be
> easily to find how this affects upper layers.
>
> As you are banned on LKML, the patch needs thorough testing and review
> before applying.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> index ff780a8..81fabdb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> static int s3c64xx_i2s_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> unsigned int base;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> switch (pdev->id) {
>> case 0:
>> @@ -47,9 +48,9 @@ static int s3c64xx_i2s_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(3));
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(3));
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static struct resource s3c64xx_iis0_resource[] = {
>> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(s3c64xx_device_iisv4);
>> static int s3c64xx_pcm_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> unsigned int base;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> switch (pdev->id) {
>> case 0:
>> @@ -136,8 +138,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_pcm_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static struct resource s3c64xx_pcm0_resource[] = {
>>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: xerofoify@gmail.com (nick)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mach-s3c64xx:Fix error handling for certain calls to s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range in the file dev-audio.c
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:48:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FA29E7.1070902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55FA1FEE.5070506@samsung.com>
On 2015-09-16 10:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.09.2015 10:51, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> This fixes error handling for calls to the function
>> s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range in the file dev-audio.c that
>> assume calls to this particular function always run
>> successfully to properly check now if these calls
>> fail by returning a error code and if so return it
>> directly to the call of these functions in order for
>> the caller to be able to handle these failed calls in
>> its own error path(s).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c | 12 +++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> I am assuming (from the past events) that you did not test the patch and
> how returning the error condition affects rest of the code. In the same
> time you ignored my request to mark such patches with Request-For-Test.
>
I will resend with a better commit message but testing is really difficult
as that would require me to have a device for all the drivers I am currently
writing for. However I will be glad to put a Request-For-Test and a better
commit message in a v2 to show I didn't write this blindly.
Sorry,
Nick
> Please send it after testing.
>
> Commit message is hard to understand, please re-phrase so it would be
> easily to find how this affects upper layers.
>
> As you are banned on LKML, the patch needs thorough testing and review
> before applying.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> index ff780a8..81fabdb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/dev-audio.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> static int s3c64xx_i2s_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> unsigned int base;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> switch (pdev->id) {
>> case 0:
>> @@ -47,9 +48,9 @@ static int s3c64xx_i2s_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(3));
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(3));
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static struct resource s3c64xx_iis0_resource[] = {
>> @@ -122,6 +123,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(s3c64xx_device_iisv4);
>> static int s3c64xx_pcm_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> unsigned int base;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> switch (pdev->id) {
>> case 0:
>> @@ -136,8 +138,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_pcm_cfg_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range(base, 5, S3C_GPIO_SFN(2));
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static struct resource s3c64xx_pcm0_resource[] = {
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-17 1:51 [PATCH] mach-s3c64xx:Fix error handling for certain calls to s3c_gpio_cfgpin_range in the file dev-audio.c Nicholas Krause
2015-09-17 1:51 ` Nicholas Krause
2015-09-17 2:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-17 2:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-17 2:48 ` nick [this message]
2015-09-17 2:48 ` nick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FA29E7.1070902@gmail.com \
--to=xerofoify@gmail.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.