* Important security noticed regarding release signing key
@ 2015-09-17 16:29 Sage Weil
2015-09-17 17:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-09-17 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-announce-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
the software and distribution channel for both sites.
To date, our investigation has not discovered any compromised code or
binaries available for download on these sites. However, we cannot fully
rule out the possibility that some compromised code or binaries were
available for download at some point in the past. Further, we can no
longer trust the integrity of the Ceph signing key, and therefore have
created a new signing key (id E84AC2C0460F3994) for verifying downloads.
This new key is committed to the ceph.git repository and is
also available from
https://git.ceph.com/release.asc
The new key should look like:
pub 4096R/460F3994 2015-09-15
uid Ceph.com (release key) <security-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org>
All future release git tags will be signed with this new key.
This intrusion did not affect other Ceph sites such as download.ceph.com
(which contained some older Ceph downloads) or git.ceph.com (which mirrors
various source repositories), and is not known to have affected any other
Ceph community infrastructure. There is no evidence that build system or
the Ceph github source repository were compromised.
New hosts for ceph.com and download.ceph.com have been created and the
sites have been rebuilt. All content available on download.ceph.com as
been verified, and all ceph.com URLs for package locations now redirect
there. There is still some content missing from download.ceph.com that
will appear later today: source tarballs will be regenerated from git, and
older release packages are being resigned with the new release key DNS
changes are still propogating so you may not see the new versions of the
ceph.com and download.ceph.com sites for another hour or so.
The download.inktank.com host has been retired and affected Red Hat
customers have been notified, further information is available at
https://securityblog.redhat.com/2015/09/17/.
Users of Ceph packages should take action as a precautionary measure to
download the newly-signed versions. Please see the instructions below.
The Ceph community would like to thank Kai Fabian for initially alerting
us to this issue.
Any questions can be directed to the email discussion lists or the #ceph
IRC channel on irc.oftc.net.
Thank you!
sage
- -----
The following steps should be performed on all nodes with Ceph software
installed.
Replace APT keys (Debian, Ubuntu)
sudo apt-key del 17ED316D
curl https://git.ceph.com/release.asc | sudo apt-key add -
Replace RPM keys (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
sudo rpm -e --allmatches gpg-pubkey-17ed316d-4fb96ee8
sudo rpm --import 'https://git.ceph.com/release.asc'
Reinstalling packages (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
sudo yum clean metadata
sudo yum reinstall -y $(repoquery --disablerepo= --enablerepo=ceph \
--queryformat='%{NAME}' list '*')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlX66k0ACgkQ2kQg7SiJlcg0wQCfVy+/2BfoNqtCfAcbuNABczFx
bpIAoLf8RTHisIn5wFvEb4Akym/UNn5l
=SEws
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509170925140.31198-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-09-17 16:57 ` Michael Kuriger
2015-09-22 8:38 ` Songbo Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael Kuriger @ 2015-09-17 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, ceph-announce-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org,
ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org,
ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org
Thanks for the notice!
Michael Kuriger
Sr. Unix Systems Engineer
r mk7193-CivJcMWXhi0@public.gmane.org | 818-649-7235
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 9:30 AM
To: ceph-announce-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org; ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org; ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of the software and distribution channel for both sites.
To date, our investigation has not discovered any compromised code or binaries available for download on these sites. However, we cannot fully rule out the possibility that some compromised code or binaries were available for download at some point in the past. Further, we can no longer trust the integrity of the Ceph signing key, and therefore have created a new signing key (id E84AC2C0460F3994) for verifying downloads.
This new key is committed to the ceph.git repository and is also available from
https://git.ceph.com/release.asc
The new key should look like:
pub 4096R/460F3994 2015-09-15
uid Ceph.com (release key) <security-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org>
All future release git tags will be signed with this new key.
This intrusion did not affect other Ceph sites such as download.ceph.com (which contained some older Ceph downloads) or git.ceph.com (which mirrors various source repositories), and is not known to have affected any other Ceph community infrastructure. There is no evidence that build system or the Ceph github source repository were compromised.
New hosts for ceph.com and download.ceph.com have been created and the sites have been rebuilt. All content available on download.ceph.com as been verified, and all ceph.com URLs for package locations now redirect there. There is still some content missing from download.ceph.com that will appear later today: source tarballs will be regenerated from git, and older release packages are being resigned with the new release key DNS changes are still propogating so you may not see the new versions of the ceph.com and download.ceph.com sites for another hour or so.
The download.inktank.com host has been retired and affected Red Hat customers have been notified, further information is available at https://securityblog.redhat.com/2015/09/17/.
Users of Ceph packages should take action as a precautionary measure to download the newly-signed versions. Please see the instructions below.
The Ceph community would like to thank Kai Fabian for initially alerting us to this issue.
Any questions can be directed to the email discussion lists or the #ceph IRC channel on irc.oftc.net.
Thank you!
sage
- -----
The following steps should be performed on all nodes with Ceph software installed.
Replace APT keys (Debian, Ubuntu)
sudo apt-key del 17ED316D
curl https://git.ceph.com/release.asc | sudo apt-key add -
Replace RPM keys (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
sudo rpm -e --allmatches gpg-pubkey-17ed316d-4fb96ee8
sudo rpm --import 'https://git.ceph.com/release.asc'
Reinstalling packages (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
sudo yum clean metadata
sudo yum reinstall -y $(repoquery --disablerepo= --enablerepo=ceph \
--queryformat='%{NAME}' list '*')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlX66k0ACgkQ2kQg7SiJlcg0wQCfVy+/2BfoNqtCfAcbuNABczFx
bpIAoLf8RTHisIn5wFvEb4Akym/UNn5l
=SEws
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-17 16:29 Important security noticed regarding release signing key Sage Weil
@ 2015-09-17 17:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
[not found] ` <robbat2-20150917T173223-066349316Z-UgNl/1uUEYUufQK+DwRw3KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509170925140.31198-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-23 12:56 ` [Ceph-announce] " Gaudenz Steinlin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2015-09-17 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel, ceph-users
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:29:35AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
> community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
> were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
>
> Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
> signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
> of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
> with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
> into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
> the software and distribution channel for both sites.
Please revoke the old keys, so that if they were taken by the attacker,
they cannot be used (you can't un-revoke a key generally).
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <robbat2-20150917T173223-066349316Z-UgNl/1uUEYUufQK+DwRw3KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-09-17 18:19 ` Sage Weil
2015-09-17 20:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-09-17 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin H. Johnson
Cc: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:29:35AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
> > community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
> > were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
> >
> > Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
> > signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
> > of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
> > with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
> > into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
> > the software and distribution channel for both sites.
>
> Please revoke the old keys, so that if they were taken by the attacker,
> they cannot be used (you can't un-revoke a key generally).
Done:
http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=ceph&op=index
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-17 18:19 ` Sage Weil
@ 2015-09-17 20:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2015-09-17 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel, ceph-users
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> > Please revoke the old keys, so that if they were taken by the attacker,
> > they cannot be used (you can't un-revoke a key generally).
> Done:
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=ceph&op=index
Thank you!
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509170925140.31198-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-17 16:57 ` Michael Kuriger
@ 2015-09-22 8:38 ` Songbo Wang
2015-09-22 14:24 ` [ceph-users] " Ken Dreyer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Songbo Wang @ 2015-09-22 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil
Cc: ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ,
ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-announce-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4478 bytes --]
Hi, all,
Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can
be opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
Thanks and Regards,
WangSongbo
2015-09-18 0:29 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil <sage-BnTBU8nroG7k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
> community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
> were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
>
> Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
> signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
> of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
> with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
> into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
> the software and distribution channel for both sites.
>
> To date, our investigation has not discovered any compromised code or
> binaries available for download on these sites. However, we cannot fully
> rule out the possibility that some compromised code or binaries were
> available for download at some point in the past. Further, we can no
> longer trust the integrity of the Ceph signing key, and therefore have
> created a new signing key (id E84AC2C0460F3994) for verifying downloads.
> This new key is committed to the ceph.git repository and is
> also available from
>
> https://git.ceph.com/release.asc
>
> The new key should look like:
>
> pub 4096R/460F3994 2015-09-15
> uid Ceph.com (release key) <security-Qp0mS5GaXlQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> All future release git tags will be signed with this new key.
>
> This intrusion did not affect other Ceph sites such as download.ceph.com
> (which contained some older Ceph downloads) or git.ceph.com (which mirrors
> various source repositories), and is not known to have affected any other
> Ceph community infrastructure. There is no evidence that build system or
> the Ceph github source repository were compromised.
>
> New hosts for ceph.com and download.ceph.com have been created and the
> sites have been rebuilt. All content available on download.ceph.com as
> been verified, and all ceph.com URLs for package locations now redirect
> there. There is still some content missing from download.ceph.com that
> will appear later today: source tarballs will be regenerated from git, and
> older release packages are being resigned with the new release key DNS
> changes are still propogating so you may not see the new versions of the
> ceph.com and download.ceph.com sites for another hour or so.
>
> The download.inktank.com host has been retired and affected Red Hat
> customers have been notified, further information is available at
> https://securityblog.redhat.com/2015/09/17/.
>
> Users of Ceph packages should take action as a precautionary measure to
> download the newly-signed versions. Please see the instructions below.
>
> The Ceph community would like to thank Kai Fabian for initially alerting
> us to this issue.
>
> Any questions can be directed to the email discussion lists or the #ceph
> IRC channel on irc.oftc.net.
>
> Thank you!
> sage
>
> - -----
>
> The following steps should be performed on all nodes with Ceph software
> installed.
>
> Replace APT keys (Debian, Ubuntu)
>
> sudo apt-key del 17ED316D
> curl https://git.ceph.com/release.asc | sudo apt-key add -
>
> Replace RPM keys (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
>
> sudo rpm -e --allmatches gpg-pubkey-17ed316d-4fb96ee8
> sudo rpm --import 'https://git.ceph.com/release.asc'
>
> Reinstalling packages (Fedora, CentOS, SUSE, etc.)
>
> sudo yum clean metadata
> sudo yum reinstall -y $(repoquery --disablerepo= --enablerepo=ceph
> \
> --queryformat='%{NAME}' list '*')
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlX66k0ACgkQ2kQg7SiJlcg0wQCfVy+/2BfoNqtCfAcbuNABczFx
> bpIAoLf8RTHisIn5wFvEb4Akym/UNn5l
> =SEws
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6650 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-22 8:38 ` Songbo Wang
@ 2015-09-22 14:24 ` Ken Dreyer
2015-09-23 2:33 ` wangsongbo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ken Dreyer @ 2015-09-22 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Songbo Wang
Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel, ceph-users, ceph-maintainers,
ceph-announce
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, all,
> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can be
> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> WangSongbo
>
The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
in the new location.
- Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-22 14:24 ` [ceph-users] " Ken Dreyer
@ 2015-09-23 2:33 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 2:50 ` Ken Dreyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: wangsongbo @ 2015-09-23 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Dreyer
Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel, ceph-users, ceph-maintainers,
ceph-announce
Hi Ken,
Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled
by teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph,
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph etc.
Any new releases will be provided ?
On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras” can be
>> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> WangSongbo
>>
> The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
> one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
> in the new location.
>
> - Ken
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [ceph-users] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-23 2:33 ` wangsongbo
@ 2015-09-23 2:50 ` Ken Dreyer
[not found] ` <CALqRxCw=T6JFC2i-ECQJoRd_n2atMLsDQGT13aq6amDqmtC2Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ken Dreyer @ 2015-09-23 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wangsongbo; +Cc: Sage Weil, ceph-devel, ceph-users, ceph-maintainers
Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
- Ken
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled by
> teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph
> etc.
> Any new releases will be provided ?
>
>
> On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, all,
>>> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras”
>>> can be
>>> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> WangSongbo
>>>
>> The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
>> one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
>> in the new location.
>>
>> - Ken
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <CALqRxCw=T6JFC2i-ECQJoRd_n2atMLsDQGT13aq6amDqmtC2Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-09-23 3:01 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 8:50 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 9:47 ` wangsongbo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: wangsongbo @ 2015-09-23 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Dreyer
Cc: ceph-devel, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
Hi Ken,
Thank you, I will update my repo and continue my test.
- Songbo
On 15/9/23 上午10:50, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
>
> - Ken
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>> Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled by
>> teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
>> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph
>> etc.
>> Any new releases will be provided ?
>>
>>
>> On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras”
>>>> can be
>>>> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> WangSongbo
>>>>
>>> The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
>>> one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
>>> in the new location.
>>>
>>> - Ken
>>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <CALqRxCw=T6JFC2i-ECQJoRd_n2atMLsDQGT13aq6amDqmtC2Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-23 3:01 ` wangsongbo
@ 2015-09-23 8:50 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 9:47 ` wangsongbo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: wangsongbo @ 2015-09-23 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Dreyer
Cc: ceph-devel, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1579 bytes --]
Hi Ken,
Just now, I run teuthology-suites in our testing, it failed because
of lacking these packages, such as
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph.x86_64,
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph etc.
The modify " rm ceph-extras repository config#137" remove the
repository , but did not solve the ansible's dependence.
How to solve this dependence ?
Thanks and Regards,
WangSongbo
On 15/9/23 上午10:50, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
>
> - Ken
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo <songbo1227-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>> Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled by
>> teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
>> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph
>> etc.
>> Any new releases will be provided ?
>>
>>
>> On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras”
>>>> can be
>>>> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> WangSongbo
>>>>
>>> The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
>>> one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
>>> in the new location.
>>>
>>> - Ken
>>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2649 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 178 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users-idqoXFIVOFJgJs9I8MT0rw@public.gmane.org
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Important security noticed regarding release signing key
[not found] ` <CALqRxCw=T6JFC2i-ECQJoRd_n2atMLsDQGT13aq6amDqmtC2Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-23 3:01 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 8:50 ` wangsongbo
@ 2015-09-23 9:47 ` wangsongbo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: wangsongbo @ 2015-09-23 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Dreyer
Cc: ceph-devel, ceph-users-Qp0mS5GaXlQ, ceph-maintainers-Qp0mS5GaXlQ
Hi Ken,
Just now, I run teuthology-suites in our testing, it failed because of lacking these packages,
such as qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph.x86_64, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph etc.
The modify "rm ceph-extras repository config#137" only remove the repository , but did not solve the ansible's dependence.
How to solve this dependence ?
Thanks and Regards,
WangSongbo
On 15/9/23 上午10:50, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Songbo, It's been removed from Ansible now:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/137
>
> - Ken
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, wangsongbo <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>> Thanks for your reply. But in the ceph-cm-ansible project scheduled by
>> teuthology, "ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras" is in used now, such as
>> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph, qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6.3ceph
>> etc.
>> Any new releases will be provided ?
>>
>>
>> On 15/9/22 下午10:24, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Songbo Wang <songbo1227@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>> Since the last week‘s attack, “ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras”
>>>> can be
>>>> opened never, but where can I get the releases of ceph-extra now?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>> WangSongbo
>>>>
>>> The packages in "ceph-extras" were old and subject to CVEs (the big
>>> one being VENOM, CVE-2015-3456). So I don't intend to host ceph-extras
>>> in the new location.
>>>
>>> - Ken
>>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ceph-announce] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-17 16:29 Important security noticed regarding release signing key Sage Weil
2015-09-17 17:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509170925140.31198-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
@ 2015-09-23 12:56 ` Gaudenz Steinlin
2015-09-23 13:16 ` Sage Weil
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Gaudenz Steinlin @ 2015-09-23 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, ceph-announce, ceph-devel, ceph-maintainers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2941 bytes --]
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
> community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
> were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
>
> Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
> signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
> of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
> with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
> into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
> the software and distribution channel for both sites.
>
> To date, our investigation has not discovered any compromised code or
> binaries available for download on these sites. However, we cannot fully
> rule out the possibility that some compromised code or binaries were
> available for download at some point in the past. Further, we can no
> longer trust the integrity of the Ceph signing key, and therefore have
> created a new signing key (id E84AC2C0460F3994) for verifying downloads.
> This new key is committed to the ceph.git repository and is
> also available from
>
> https://git.ceph.com/release.asc
>
> The new key should look like:
>
> pub 4096R/460F3994 2015-09-15
> uid Ceph.com (release key) <security@ceph.com>
>
> All future release git tags will be signed with this new key.
>
> This intrusion did not affect other Ceph sites such as download.ceph.com
> (which contained some older Ceph downloads) or git.ceph.com (which mirrors
> various source repositories), and is not known to have affected any other
> Ceph community infrastructure. There is no evidence that build system or
> the Ceph github source repository were compromised.
>
> New hosts for ceph.com and download.ceph.com have been created and the
> sites have been rebuilt. All content available on download.ceph.com as
> been verified, and all ceph.com URLs for package locations now redirect
> there. There is still some content missing from download.ceph.com that
> will appear later today: source tarballs will be regenerated from git, and
> older release packages are being resigned with the new release key DNS
> changes are still propogating so you may not see the new versions of the
> ceph.com and download.ceph.com sites for another hour or so.
It would be nice to have a way to verify the integrity of tarballs
downloaded from http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/. Could you please add
individual signatures or an sha256sum file signed with your release key.
This is important for people building from source tarballs and
distribution packagers baseing their packages from tarballs. Debian and
Ubuntu packages are currently built from them.
Gaudenz
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 810 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [Ceph-announce] Important security noticed regarding release signing key
2015-09-23 12:56 ` [Ceph-announce] " Gaudenz Steinlin
@ 2015-09-23 13:16 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-09-23 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gaudenz Steinlin; +Cc: ceph-announce, ceph-devel, ceph-maintainers
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> writes:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Last week, Red Hat investigated an intrusion on the sites of both the Ceph
> > community project (ceph.com) and Inktank (download.inktank.com), which
> > were hosted on a computer system outside of Red Hat infrastructure.
> >
> > Ceph.com provided Ceph community versions downloads signed with a Ceph
> > signing key (id 7EBFDD5D17ED316D). Download.inktank.comprovided releases
> > of the Red Hat Ceph product for Ubuntu and CentOS operating systems signed
> > with an Inktank signing key (id 5438C7019DCEEEAD). While the investigation
> > into the intrusion is ongoing, our initial focus was on the integrity of
> > the software and distribution channel for both sites.
> >
> > To date, our investigation has not discovered any compromised code or
> > binaries available for download on these sites. However, we cannot fully
> > rule out the possibility that some compromised code or binaries were
> > available for download at some point in the past. Further, we can no
> > longer trust the integrity of the Ceph signing key, and therefore have
> > created a new signing key (id E84AC2C0460F3994) for verifying downloads.
> > This new key is committed to the ceph.git repository and is
> > also available from
> >
> > https://git.ceph.com/release.asc
> >
> > The new key should look like:
> >
> > pub 4096R/460F3994 2015-09-15
> > uid Ceph.com (release key) <security@ceph.com>
> >
> > All future release git tags will be signed with this new key.
> >
> > This intrusion did not affect other Ceph sites such as download.ceph.com
> > (which contained some older Ceph downloads) or git.ceph.com (which mirrors
> > various source repositories), and is not known to have affected any other
> > Ceph community infrastructure. There is no evidence that build system or
> > the Ceph github source repository were compromised.
> >
> > New hosts for ceph.com and download.ceph.com have been created and the
> > sites have been rebuilt. All content available on download.ceph.com as
> > been verified, and all ceph.com URLs for package locations now redirect
> > there. There is still some content missing from download.ceph.com that
> > will appear later today: source tarballs will be regenerated from git, and
> > older release packages are being resigned with the new release key DNS
> > changes are still propogating so you may not see the new versions of the
> > ceph.com and download.ceph.com sites for another hour or so.
>
> It would be nice to have a way to verify the integrity of tarballs
> downloaded from http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/. Could you please add
> individual signatures or an sha256sum file signed with your release key.
> This is important for people building from source tarballs and
> distribution packagers baseing their packages from tarballs. Debian and
> Ubuntu packages are currently built from them.
Future releases will have tarball signatures. Alfredo and Andrew are
working on the new build/release tooling now.
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-23 13:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-17 16:29 Important security noticed regarding release signing key Sage Weil
2015-09-17 17:34 ` Robin H. Johnson
[not found] ` <robbat2-20150917T173223-066349316Z-UgNl/1uUEYUufQK+DwRw3KxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-17 18:19 ` Sage Weil
2015-09-17 20:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1509170925140.31198-vIokxiIdD2AQNTJnQDzGJqxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-17 16:57 ` Michael Kuriger
2015-09-22 8:38 ` Songbo Wang
2015-09-22 14:24 ` [ceph-users] " Ken Dreyer
2015-09-23 2:33 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 2:50 ` Ken Dreyer
[not found] ` <CALqRxCw=T6JFC2i-ECQJoRd_n2atMLsDQGT13aq6amDqmtC2Kw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-23 3:01 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 8:50 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 9:47 ` wangsongbo
2015-09-23 12:56 ` [Ceph-announce] " Gaudenz Steinlin
2015-09-23 13:16 ` Sage Weil
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.