From: "Emilio López" <emilio.lopez-ZGY8ohtN/8pPYcu2f3hruQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
kgene-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: bindings: mfd: cros ec: document vbc EC property
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:31:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5602B7BA.8020302@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150923003401.GB16510@x1>
Hi Lee,
On 22/09/15 21:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Emilio López wrote:
>
>> Some EC implementations include a small nvram space used to store
>> verified boot context data. This boolean property lets us indicate
>> whether this space is available or not on a specific EC implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez-ZGY8ohtN/8pPYcu2f3hruQ@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch is new in v3, split from 3/4
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> index 1777916..136e0c2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ Required properties (LPC):
>> - compatible: "google,cros-ec-lpc"
>> - reg: List of (IO address, size) pairs defining the interface uses
>>
>> +Optional properties (all):
>> +- google,has-vbc-nvram: Some implementations of the EC include a small
>> + nvram space used to store verified boot context data. This boolean flag
>> + is used to specify whether this nvram is present or not.
>
> Is there no way to check for this at runtime?
You can issue a read and see if it succeeds, but the problem is that
some EC implementations return success even when they don't implement
the functionality.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk (Emilio López)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: bindings: mfd: cros ec: document vbc EC property
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:31:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5602B7BA.8020302@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150923003401.GB16510@x1>
Hi Lee,
On 22/09/15 21:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Emilio L?pez wrote:
>
>> Some EC implementations include a small nvram space used to store
>> verified boot context data. This boolean property lets us indicate
>> whether this space is available or not on a specific EC implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch is new in v3, split from 3/4
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> index 1777916..136e0c2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ Required properties (LPC):
>> - compatible: "google,cros-ec-lpc"
>> - reg: List of (IO address, size) pairs defining the interface uses
>>
>> +Optional properties (all):
>> +- google,has-vbc-nvram: Some implementations of the EC include a small
>> + nvram space used to store verified boot context data. This boolean flag
>> + is used to specify whether this nvram is present or not.
>
> Is there no way to check for this at runtime?
You can issue a read and see if it succeeds, but the problem is that
some EC implementations return success even when they don't implement
the functionality.
Cheers,
Emilio
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Emilio López" <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, olof@lixom.net, kgene@kernel.org,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: bindings: mfd: cros ec: document vbc EC property
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:31:22 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5602B7BA.8020302@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150923003401.GB16510@x1>
Hi Lee,
On 22/09/15 21:34, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Emilio López wrote:
>
>> Some EC implementations include a small nvram space used to store
>> verified boot context data. This boolean property lets us indicate
>> whether this space is available or not on a specific EC implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emilio López <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch is new in v3, split from 3/4
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> index 1777916..136e0c2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/cros-ec.txt
>> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ Required properties (LPC):
>> - compatible: "google,cros-ec-lpc"
>> - reg: List of (IO address, size) pairs defining the interface uses
>>
>> +Optional properties (all):
>> +- google,has-vbc-nvram: Some implementations of the EC include a small
>> + nvram space used to store verified boot context data. This boolean flag
>> + is used to specify whether this nvram is present or not.
>
> Is there no way to check for this at runtime?
You can issue a read and see if it succeeds, but the problem is that
some EC implementations return success even when they don't implement
the functionality.
Cheers,
Emilio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-23 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-21 13:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] platform/chrome: vboot context support Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] sysfs: Support is_visible() on binary attributes Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:41 ` Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:41 ` Emilio López
2015-10-04 18:33 ` Greg KH
2015-10-04 18:33 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <20151004183334.GA23538-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-07 22:08 ` Olof Johansson
2015-10-07 22:08 ` Olof Johansson
2015-10-07 22:08 ` Olof Johansson
2015-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: bindings: mfd: cros ec: document vbc EC property Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` Emilio López
2015-09-21 15:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-09-21 15:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-09-23 0:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-09-23 0:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-09-23 14:31 ` Emilio López [this message]
2015-09-23 14:31 ` Emilio López
2015-09-23 14:31 ` Emilio López
2015-09-24 17:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-09-24 17:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] platform/chrome: Support reading/writing the vboot context Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` Emilio López
2015-10-07 22:08 ` Olof Johansson
2015-10-07 22:08 ` Olof Johansson
2015-09-21 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: dts: Enable EC vboot context support on Peach boards Emilio López
2015-09-21 13:38 ` Emilio López
2015-10-07 22:31 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-10-07 22:31 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5602B7BA.8020302@collabora.co.uk \
--to=emilio.lopez-zgy8ohtn/8ppycu2f3hruq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kgene-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.