From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mt8173.dtsi: correct i2c node names
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:00:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5607E889.2060501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGS+omCzycc+RFeDftooDcj_f9M4SXhoO79u8m9e=ZiL1QV1tA@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/09/15 15:34, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> Node name in device tree should describe general class of the
>> device. Correct incorrect i2c node names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>
Applied, thanks.
>> ---
>> This is based on v4.3-rc1.
>> All the other i2c node names are correct.
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> index d18ee42..7f360b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c3: i2c3@11010000 {
>> + i2c3: i2c@11010000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000280 0 0x80>;
>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c4: i2c4@11011000 {
>> + i2c4: i2c@11011000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11011000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000300 0 0x80>;
>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c6: i2c6@11013000 {
>> + i2c6: i2c@11013000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11013000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000080 0 0x80>;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mt8173.dtsi: correct i2c node names
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 15:00:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5607E889.2060501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGS+omCzycc+RFeDftooDcj_f9M4SXhoO79u8m9e=ZiL1QV1tA@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/09/15 15:34, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> Node name in device tree should describe general class of the
>> device. Correct incorrect i2c node names.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>
Applied, thanks.
>> ---
>> This is based on v4.3-rc1.
>> All the other i2c node names are correct.
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> index d18ee42..7f360b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c3: i2c3 at 11010000 {
>> + i2c3: i2c at 11010000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000280 0 0x80>;
>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c4: i2c4 at 11011000 {
>> + i2c4: i2c at 11011000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11011000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000300 0 0x80>;
>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> - i2c6: i2c6 at 11013000 {
>> + i2c6: i2c at 11013000 {
>> compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c";
>> reg = <0 0x11013000 0 0x70>,
>> <0 0x11000080 0 0x80>;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-27 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-16 1:35 [PATCH] arm64: mt8173.dtsi: correct i2c node names Yingjoe Chen
2015-09-16 1:35 ` Yingjoe Chen
2015-09-16 1:35 ` Yingjoe Chen
[not found] ` <1442367325-55819-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-09-16 13:34 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-16 13:34 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-16 13:34 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-09-27 13:00 ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2015-09-27 13:00 ` Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5607E889.2060501@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
--cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.