All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: Move display-timings node from fimd to dp
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:17:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560905B0.1090708@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAObsKDqpBnggX7sHCgQ5d7ZxYumh_ga8kbLQc4bQ=N+M6BoCg@mail.gmail.com>

W dniu 28.09.2015 o 17:56, Tomeu Vizoso pisze:
> Hi Kukjin and Krzysztof,
> 
> could you take a look at this?

Of course, but please be patient. It waits on my todo list. I have just
returned from holidays.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> On 17 September 2015 at 14:48, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>>
>> This patch moves the display-timings node from fimd to dp to reflect the
>> device tree bindings change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>> [tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com: Rebased]
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> looks like a long time ago the bindings were changed and the DTs for
>> these boards weren't updated.
>>
>> I have retaken Sean's forgotten patch and rebased it, but I have only
>> tested on an Arndale that exynos-drm doesn't complain about missing
>> timings.
>>
>> Regards,
>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: Move display-timings node from fimd to dp
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:17:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560905B0.1090708@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAObsKDqpBnggX7sHCgQ5d7ZxYumh_ga8kbLQc4bQ=N+M6BoCg@mail.gmail.com>

W dniu 28.09.2015 o 17:56, Tomeu Vizoso pisze:
> Hi Kukjin and Krzysztof,
> 
> could you take a look at this?

Of course, but please be patient. It waits on my todo list. I have just
returned from holidays.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> On 17 September 2015 at 14:48, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
>> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>>
>> This patch moves the display-timings node from fimd to dp to reflect the
>> device tree bindings change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>> [tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com: Rebased]
>> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> looks like a long time ago the bindings were changed and the DTs for
>> these boards weren't updated.
>>
>> I have retaken Sean's forgotten patch and rebased it, but I have only
>> tested on an Arndale that exynos-drm doesn't complain about missing
>> timings.
>>
>> Regards,
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-28  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 12:48 [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: Move display-timings node from fimd to dp Tomeu Vizoso
2015-09-17 12:48 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-09-28  8:56 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-09-28  8:56   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-09-28  9:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-09-28  9:17     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-29  7:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-29  7:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560905B0.1090708@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.