From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11 RESEND] ARM: OMAP: DRA7: hwmod: Add data for McASP3
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:57:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CCB54.60306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560BDCF8.20909@ti.com>
On 09/30/2015 04:00 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>> +/* l4_per2 -> mcasp3 */
>>>> +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if dra7xx_l4_per2__mcasp3 = {
>>>> + .master = &dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod,
>>>> + .slave = &dra7xx_mcasp3_hwmod,
>>>
>>> So this is the low-speed control/register access port, where the MPU
>>> writes to the McASP3 config registers...
>>>
>>>> + .clk = "l3_iclk_div",
>>>
>>> ... and thus this interface clock doesn't look right for this port, since
>>> it's most likely generated from the L4PER2, where this port is connected.
>>> So it should probably be "l4_iclk_div".
>>
>> There is no "l4_iclk_div" for dra7xx. Looking around the file all other script
>> generated data uses "l3_iclk_div" for IPs under dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod.
>>
>> Tero: do you know the reason for this?
>
> This comes from the autogen generated data. Looking at the hwdb data for dra7,
> it seems l3 clock is defined as the OCP input clock for most of the modules.
>
> Looking at TRM, we also have L3 ICK defined as the interface clock for GPIO
> modules for example, and also mcasp modules.
>
> I think this is just a documentation issue and we are missing a divide by 2
> from all interface clocks, the interface clocks are coming from l4
> interconnects and the interconnect chapter still clearly states that the l4
> clock is l3 clock / 2.
It seams that we have the clock node for the l4_iclk_div, but it is called as
l4_root_clk_div.
I will use this in the mcasp3 hwmod patch.
--
Péter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (Peter Ujfalusi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11 RESEND] ARM: OMAP: DRA7: hwmod: Add data for McASP3
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:57:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CCB54.60306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560BDCF8.20909@ti.com>
On 09/30/2015 04:00 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>> +/* l4_per2 -> mcasp3 */
>>>> +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if dra7xx_l4_per2__mcasp3 = {
>>>> + .master = &dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod,
>>>> + .slave = &dra7xx_mcasp3_hwmod,
>>>
>>> So this is the low-speed control/register access port, where the MPU
>>> writes to the McASP3 config registers...
>>>
>>>> + .clk = "l3_iclk_div",
>>>
>>> ... and thus this interface clock doesn't look right for this port, since
>>> it's most likely generated from the L4PER2, where this port is connected.
>>> So it should probably be "l4_iclk_div".
>>
>> There is no "l4_iclk_div" for dra7xx. Looking around the file all other script
>> generated data uses "l3_iclk_div" for IPs under dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod.
>>
>> Tero: do you know the reason for this?
>
> This comes from the autogen generated data. Looking at the hwdb data for dra7,
> it seems l3 clock is defined as the OCP input clock for most of the modules.
>
> Looking at TRM, we also have L3 ICK defined as the interface clock for GPIO
> modules for example, and also mcasp modules.
>
> I think this is just a documentation issue and we are missing a divide by 2
> from all interface clocks, the interface clocks are coming from l4
> interconnects and the interconnect chapter still clearly states that the l4
> clock is l3 clock / 2.
It seams that we have the clock node for the l4_iclk_div, but it is called as
l4_root_clk_div.
I will use this in the mcasp3 hwmod patch.
--
P?ter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: <tony@atomide.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11 RESEND] ARM: OMAP: DRA7: hwmod: Add data for McASP3
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:57:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CCB54.60306@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560BDCF8.20909@ti.com>
On 09/30/2015 04:00 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>>> +/* l4_per2 -> mcasp3 */
>>>> +static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if dra7xx_l4_per2__mcasp3 = {
>>>> + .master = &dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod,
>>>> + .slave = &dra7xx_mcasp3_hwmod,
>>>
>>> So this is the low-speed control/register access port, where the MPU
>>> writes to the McASP3 config registers...
>>>
>>>> + .clk = "l3_iclk_div",
>>>
>>> ... and thus this interface clock doesn't look right for this port, since
>>> it's most likely generated from the L4PER2, where this port is connected.
>>> So it should probably be "l4_iclk_div".
>>
>> There is no "l4_iclk_div" for dra7xx. Looking around the file all other script
>> generated data uses "l3_iclk_div" for IPs under dra7xx_l4_per2_hwmod.
>>
>> Tero: do you know the reason for this?
>
> This comes from the autogen generated data. Looking at the hwdb data for dra7,
> it seems l3 clock is defined as the OCP input clock for most of the modules.
>
> Looking at TRM, we also have L3 ICK defined as the interface clock for GPIO
> modules for example, and also mcasp modules.
>
> I think this is just a documentation issue and we are missing a divide by 2
> from all interface clocks, the interface clocks are coming from l4
> interconnects and the interconnect chapter still clearly states that the l4
> clock is l3 clock / 2.
It seams that we have the clock node for the l4_iclk_div, but it is called as
l4_root_clk_div.
I will use this in the mcasp3 hwmod patch.
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 14:10 [PATCH 01/11 RESEND] ARM: OMAP: DRA7: hwmod: Add data for McASP3 Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-15 14:10 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-15 14:10 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-25 7:02 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-25 7:02 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-25 7:02 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-27 7:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-09-27 7:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-09-30 10:06 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-30 10:06 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-30 10:06 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-09-30 13:00 ` Tero Kristo
2015-09-30 13:00 ` Tero Kristo
2015-09-30 13:00 ` Tero Kristo
2015-10-01 5:57 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2015-10-01 5:57 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-01 5:57 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 9:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-10-02 9:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2015-10-02 11:22 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 11:22 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 11:22 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 11:55 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 11:55 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 11:55 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 12:48 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 12:48 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-10-02 12:48 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560CCB54.60306@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.