From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM"
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:00:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CE816.1060307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bncjemdk.fsf@belgarion.home>
Le 30/09/2015 21:29, Robert Jarzmik a écrit :
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
>
>> This reverts commit 68feaca0b13e453aa14ee064c1736202b48b342f.
>> This commit breaks legacy platforms, for which :
>> (a) no pwm table is added (legacy platforms)
>> (b) in this case, in pwm_get(), pmw_lookup_list is empty, and therefore
>> chosen = NULL, and therefore pwm_get() returns NULL, and pwm_get()
>> returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>> (c) as a consequence, this code is unreachable in pwm_bl.c :
>> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s:%d(): %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
>> if (ret = -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> goto err_alloc;
>>
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
>> pb->legacy = true;
>> pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
>>
>> As this code is unreachable, all legacy platforms relying on pwm_id are
>> broken, amongst which pxa have been tested as broken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Thierry, would you have a look please ?
> As I said before, all legacy platform relying on pwm_id are broken. I'd like to
> be sure this lands in the next -rc series.
Well, as I answered on the linux-pwm mailing-list (I was not in copy) here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2744
I wonder if it's not easier to fix the platforms and add the pwm tables...
Otherwise, Boris proposed this fix:
8<-----------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index eff379b..00483d4 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
- if (ret = -EPROBE_DEFER)
- goto err_alloc;
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
pb->legacy = true;
pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+
goto err_alloc;
}
}
which is not tested and may add an extra non-valid error log.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM"
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:00:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CE816.1060307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bncjemdk.fsf@belgarion.home>
Le 30/09/2015 21:29, Robert Jarzmik a écrit :
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
>
>> This reverts commit 68feaca0b13e453aa14ee064c1736202b48b342f.
>> This commit breaks legacy platforms, for which :
>> (a) no pwm table is added (legacy platforms)
>> (b) in this case, in pwm_get(), pmw_lookup_list is empty, and therefore
>> chosen == NULL, and therefore pwm_get() returns NULL, and pwm_get()
>> returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>> (c) as a consequence, this code is unreachable in pwm_bl.c :
>> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s:%d(): %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
>> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> goto err_alloc;
>>
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
>> pb->legacy = true;
>> pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
>>
>> As this code is unreachable, all legacy platforms relying on pwm_id are
>> broken, amongst which pxa have been tested as broken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Thierry, would you have a look please ?
> As I said before, all legacy platform relying on pwm_id are broken. I'd like to
> be sure this lands in the next -rc series.
Well, as I answered on the linux-pwm mailing-list (I was not in copy) here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2744
I wonder if it's not easier to fix the platforms and add the pwm tables...
Otherwise, Boris proposed this fix:
8<-----------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index eff379b..00483d4 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- goto err_alloc;
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
pb->legacy = true;
pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+
goto err_alloc;
}
}
which is not tested and may add an extra non-valid error log.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM"
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:00:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CE816.1060307@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bncjemdk.fsf@belgarion.home>
Le 30/09/2015 21:29, Robert Jarzmik a écrit :
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> writes:
>
>> This reverts commit 68feaca0b13e453aa14ee064c1736202b48b342f.
>> This commit breaks legacy platforms, for which :
>> (a) no pwm table is added (legacy platforms)
>> (b) in this case, in pwm_get(), pmw_lookup_list is empty, and therefore
>> chosen == NULL, and therefore pwm_get() returns NULL, and pwm_get()
>> returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>> (c) as a consequence, this code is unreachable in pwm_bl.c :
>> if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s:%d(): %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, ret);
>> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> goto err_alloc;
>>
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
>> pb->legacy = true;
>> pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
>>
>> As this code is unreachable, all legacy platforms relying on pwm_id are
>> broken, amongst which pxa have been tested as broken.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Thierry, would you have a look please ?
> As I said before, all legacy platform relying on pwm_id are broken. I'd like to
> be sure this lands in the next -rc series.
Well, as I answered on the linux-pwm mailing-list (I was not in copy) here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pwm/2744
I wonder if it's not easier to fix the platforms and add the pwm tables...
Otherwise, Boris proposed this fix:
8<-----------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index eff379b..00483d4 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
- if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- goto err_alloc;
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
pb->legacy = true;
pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request legacy PWM\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
+
goto err_alloc;
}
}
which is not tested and may add an extra non-valid error log.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-26 19:24 [PATCH] Revert "backlight: pwm: Handle EPROBE_DEFER while requesting the PWM" Robert Jarzmik
2015-09-26 19:24 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-09-28 8:57 ` Nicolas FERRE
2015-09-30 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-09-30 19:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 8:00 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-10-01 8:00 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-01 8:00 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-10-01 9:06 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 9:06 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 9:06 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 17:39 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 17:39 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-01 17:39 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-05 9:35 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 9:35 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 11:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 11:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 12:58 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 12:58 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 13:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 13:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 14:07 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 14:07 ` Thierry Reding
2015-10-05 15:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 15:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-05 15:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-10-12 12:39 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 12:39 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2015-10-12 12:39 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560CE816.1060307@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.