All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: make cpuidle_ops interfaces ARM64 compliant
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:37:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560E5076.7020906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443689933-28882-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>


Hi Lorenzo,


On 10/01/2015 10:58 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> In preparation for sharing PSCI idle operations on ARM and ARM64,
> this patch refines the ARM cpuidle_ops interfaces so that the
> two arches can use the same interfaces seamlessly.
>
> Based-on-patch-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 4 ++--
>   arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c      | 4 ++--
>   drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c         | 9 +++++++--
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> index 0f84249..ee36dd4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static inline int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>   struct device_node;
>
>   struct cpuidle_ops {
> -	int (*suspend)(int cpu, unsigned long arg);
> -	int (*init)(struct device_node *, int cpu);

I don't know the reason why the 'cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle' signature was 
changed. It has before the same signature as this ops.

As in ARM, we can have more than one driver using the cpuidle_ops 
infrastructure, removing the struct device_node * parameter will force 
to add a call to of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL) in each driver with a call 
to of_node_put (btw it is missing below in qcom_cpuidle_init), the 
rollback labels and this will lead to duplicated code.

So why not change ARM64 signature instead ?

> +	int (*suspend)(unsigned long arg);
> +	int (*init)(unsigned int cpu);
>   };
>
>   struct of_cpuidle_method {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 318da33..a75b7ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
>   	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
>   	if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
> -		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(cpu, index);
> +		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
>
>   	return ret;
>   }
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
>
>   	ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
>   	if (!ret && cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
> -		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
> +		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu);
>
>   	of_node_put(cpu_node);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> index b04b05a..8deaea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,9 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> -static int qcom_idle_enter(int cpu, unsigned long index)
> +static int qcom_idle_enter(unsigned long index)
>   {
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>   	return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index](cpu);
>   }
>
> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
>   	{ },
>   };
>
> -static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> +static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	const struct of_device_id *match_id;
>   	struct device_node *state_node;
> @@ -217,6 +218,10 @@ static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>   	idle_fn *fns;
>   	cpumask_t mask;
>   	bool use_scm_power_down = false;
> +	struct device_node *cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +
> +	if (!cpu_node)
> +		return -ENODEV;
>
>   	for (i = 0; ; i++) {
>   		state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i);
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: make cpuidle_ops interfaces ARM64 compliant
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:37:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560E5076.7020906@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443689933-28882-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>


Hi Lorenzo,


On 10/01/2015 10:58 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> In preparation for sharing PSCI idle operations on ARM and ARM64,
> this patch refines the ARM cpuidle_ops interfaces so that the
> two arches can use the same interfaces seamlessly.
>
> Based-on-patch-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 4 ++--
>   arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c      | 4 ++--
>   drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c         | 9 +++++++--
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> index 0f84249..ee36dd4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static inline int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>   struct device_node;
>
>   struct cpuidle_ops {
> -	int (*suspend)(int cpu, unsigned long arg);
> -	int (*init)(struct device_node *, int cpu);

I don't know the reason why the 'cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle' signature was 
changed. It has before the same signature as this ops.

As in ARM, we can have more than one driver using the cpuidle_ops 
infrastructure, removing the struct device_node * parameter will force 
to add a call to of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL) in each driver with a call 
to of_node_put (btw it is missing below in qcom_cpuidle_init), the 
rollback labels and this will lead to duplicated code.

So why not change ARM64 signature instead ?

> +	int (*suspend)(unsigned long arg);
> +	int (*init)(unsigned int cpu);
>   };
>
>   struct of_cpuidle_method {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 318da33..a75b7ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
>   	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
>   	if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
> -		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(cpu, index);
> +		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
>
>   	return ret;
>   }
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
>
>   	ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
>   	if (!ret && cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
> -		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
> +		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu);
>
>   	of_node_put(cpu_node);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> index b04b05a..8deaea0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,9 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> -static int qcom_idle_enter(int cpu, unsigned long index)
> +static int qcom_idle_enter(unsigned long index)
>   {
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>   	return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index](cpu);
>   }
>
> @@ -207,7 +208,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
>   	{ },
>   };
>
> -static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> +static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
>   {
>   	const struct of_device_id *match_id;
>   	struct device_node *state_node;
> @@ -217,6 +218,10 @@ static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>   	idle_fn *fns;
>   	cpumask_t mask;
>   	bool use_scm_power_down = false;
> +	struct device_node *cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +
> +	if (!cpu_node)
> +		return -ENODEV;
>
>   	for (i = 0; ; i++) {
>   		state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i);
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-02  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-01  8:58 [PATCH 0/2] Enabling PSCI based idle on ARM 32-bit platforms Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-01  8:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-01  8:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: cpuidle: make cpuidle_ops interfaces ARM64 compliant Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-01  8:58   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02  9:37   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-10-02  9:37     ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-10-02 10:52     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-02 10:52       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-01  8:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM64: kernel: PSCI: move PSCI idle management code to drivers/firmware Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-01  8:58   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560E5076.7020906@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
    --cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.