From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: pgtable: free kernel page tables via RCU to fix ptdump UAF
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:58:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560ce7db-1afb-421a-bac3-3710f8f1966e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630041012.5975-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
On 6/30/26 06:10, David Carlier wrote:
> ptdump_walk_pgd() walks the kernel page tables under get_online_mems() and
> mmap_write_lock(&init_mm). Neither lock stops vmalloc from freeing a kernel
> PTE page underneath the walk.
I guess other directmap modifications would similarly be problematic (assuming
we'd collapse into PMDs for reducing directmap fragmentation, I think some
patches are on the list for that).
Not sure if all of these would go through pagetable_free_kernel(), given that we
have memblock-allocated page tables that are freed entirely differently.
>
> When vmap_try_huge_pmd() promotes a range to a huge PMD it collapses the
> existing PTE table and frees it via pmd_free_pte_page(). On x86, riscv and
> powerpc this runs without the init_mm mmap lock; only arm64 takes it, and not
> on the block-split path. So ptdump can dereference a just-freed PTE page,
> which is the use after free syzbot hit in ptdump_pte_entry().
>
> The race is not new. ptdump walks the whole kernel address space, including
> ranges other code is actively mapping, so it reads page tables it does not
> own. 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables")
> only widened the window; the Fixes tag points there for that reason.
>
> Every other walker works on a range it owns and is the only one mutating it:
> set_memory() on arm64/riscv/loongarch, the arm64 block-split path, the
> openrisc DMA path and the hugetlb_vmemmap remap. Nothing frees those ranges
> concurrently, so they cannot race and do not need RCU. ptdump is the only
> walker that traverses ranges it does not own.
>
> Defer the free by an RCU grace period. pagetable_free_kernel() now frees via
> call_rcu() in both the async and non-async configs. The async path still
> flushes the TLB first, then queues the per-page RCU free. The page stays
> valid until any walk that may have observed it drops its RCU read lock.
>
> On the read side ptdump_walk_pgd() takes the RCU read lock around the walk,
> and walk_page_range_debug() asserts it with RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() for the
> init_mm case rather than taking it, matching pagewalk.c convention. A walker
> either sees the cleared PMD and skips, or keeps the page alive until it drops
> the lock. The owned-range walkers are unchanged.
>
> ptdump callbacks now run under RCU, so they must not sleep. The arch
> note_page() and effective_prot() callbacks only format into the preallocated
> seq_file buffer, and the walker does not call cond_resched(); the only
> GFP_KERNEL marker setup runs before the walk.
>
> Fixes: 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables")
> Reported-by: syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a287988.39669fcc.33b062.00a0.GAE@google.com/T/
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
> ---
> v5: reframe changelog around the pre-existing race and range ownership;
> correct the mmap-lock description (arm64 is the exception, not x86);
> move rcu_read_lock() into ptdump_walk_pgd() and assert it in
> walk_page_range_debug(); drop walk_kernel_page_table_range_rcu(); fix the
> pgtable-generic.c comment; document the no-sleep audit of the callbacks.
> v4: defer the free in both the async and non async configs, not just
> the async one. Move the walk under a named
> walk_kernel_page_table_range_rcu() helper instead of open coding
> rcu_read_lock() in walk_page_range_debug().
> v3: take rcu_read_lock() in the init_mm branch of
> walk_page_range_debug() rather than inside the lockless walker,
> which the arm64 split paths also use with GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL and
> can sleep.
> v2: use call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu().
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 7 -------
> mm/pagewalk.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/ptdump.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 485df9c2dbdd..79408a17a1b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -3695,14 +3695,7 @@ static inline void __pagetable_free(struct ptdesc *pt)
> __free_pages(page, compound_order(page));
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_KERNEL_PGTABLE_FREE
> void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt);
> -#else
> -static inline void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> -{
> - __pagetable_free(pt);
> -}
> -#endif
Okay, now we always incur a function call overhead. I guess it will be fine,
just saying.
> /**
> * pagetable_free - Free pagetables
> * @pt: The page table descriptor
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index 3ae2586ff45b..c0be87580989 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> * Note: Be careful to walk the kernel pages tables, the caller may be need to
> * take other effective approaches (mmap lock may be insufficient) to prevent
> * the intermediate kernel page tables belonging to the specified address range
> - * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove).
> + * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove, vmap huge page promotion).
> */
> int walk_kernel_page_table_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> const struct mm_walk_ops *ops, pgd_t *pgd, void *private)
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ int walk_kernel_page_table_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> * Use this function to walk the kernel page tables locklessly. It should be
> * guaranteed that the caller has exclusive access over the range they are
> * operating on - that there should be no concurrent access, for example,
> - * changing permissions for vmalloc objects.
> + * changing permissions for vmalloc objects, or vmap huge page promotion.
> */
> int walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> const struct mm_walk_ops *ops, pgd_t *pgd, void *private)
> @@ -692,9 +692,13 @@ int walk_page_range_debug(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> };
>
> /* For convenience, we allow traversal of kernel mappings. */
> - if (mm == &init_mm)
> - return walk_kernel_page_table_range(start, end, ops,
> - pgd, private);
> + if (mm == &init_mm) {
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(),
> + "RCU read lock must be held across kernel page table walk");
> + return walk_kernel_page_table_range(start, end, ops, pgd,
> + private);
> + }
> +
> if (start >= end || !walk.mm)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (!check_ops_safe(ops))
> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> index b91b1a98029c..7a32e4821957 100644
> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,13 @@ pte_t *pte_offset_map_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> goto again;
> }
>
> +static void kernel_pgtable_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *pt = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> +
> + __pagetable_free(pt);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_KERNEL_PGTABLE_FREE
> static void kernel_pgtable_work_func(struct work_struct *work);
>
> @@ -434,8 +441,15 @@ static void kernel_pgtable_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_unlock(&kernel_pgtable_work.lock);
>
> iommu_sva_invalidate_kva_range(PAGE_OFFSET, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
> +
> + /*
> + * Debug walkers (ptdump) may walk ranges they do not own and race this
> + * free, so they walk under rcu_read_lock(). Free after a grace period:
> + * a walker either already saw the cleared PMD, or keeps the page alive
> + * until it drops the RCU lock.
> + */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pt, next, &page_list, pt_list)
> - __pagetable_free(pt);
> + call_rcu(&pt->pt_rcu_head, kernel_pgtable_free_rcu);
> }
>
> void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> @@ -446,4 +460,10 @@ void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
>
> schedule_work(&kernel_pgtable_work.work);
> }
> +#else
> +void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> +{
> + /* Defer the free by a grace period; see kernel_pgtable_work_func(). */
> + call_rcu(&pt->pt_rcu_head, kernel_pgtable_free_rcu);
> +}
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/ptdump.c b/mm/ptdump.c
> index 973020000096..50cd96a33dfd 100644
> --- a/mm/ptdump.c
> +++ b/mm/ptdump.c
> @@ -178,11 +178,13 @@ void ptdump_walk_pgd(struct ptdump_state *st, struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>
> get_online_mems();
> mmap_write_lock(mm);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> while (range->start != range->end) {
> walk_page_range_debug(mm, range->start, range->end,
> &ptdump_ops, pgd, st);
> range++;
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
Any reason that is not done inside walk_page_range_debug() ? Dropping the lock
in between should not be a concern?
--
Cheers,
David
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: pgtable: free kernel page tables via RCU to fix ptdump UAF
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 17:58:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560ce7db-1afb-421a-bac3-3710f8f1966e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630041012.5975-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
On 6/30/26 06:10, David Carlier wrote:
> ptdump_walk_pgd() walks the kernel page tables under get_online_mems() and
> mmap_write_lock(&init_mm). Neither lock stops vmalloc from freeing a kernel
> PTE page underneath the walk.
I guess other directmap modifications would similarly be problematic (assuming
we'd collapse into PMDs for reducing directmap fragmentation, I think some
patches are on the list for that).
Not sure if all of these would go through pagetable_free_kernel(), given that we
have memblock-allocated page tables that are freed entirely differently.
>
> When vmap_try_huge_pmd() promotes a range to a huge PMD it collapses the
> existing PTE table and frees it via pmd_free_pte_page(). On x86, riscv and
> powerpc this runs without the init_mm mmap lock; only arm64 takes it, and not
> on the block-split path. So ptdump can dereference a just-freed PTE page,
> which is the use after free syzbot hit in ptdump_pte_entry().
>
> The race is not new. ptdump walks the whole kernel address space, including
> ranges other code is actively mapping, so it reads page tables it does not
> own. 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables")
> only widened the window; the Fixes tag points there for that reason.
>
> Every other walker works on a range it owns and is the only one mutating it:
> set_memory() on arm64/riscv/loongarch, the arm64 block-split path, the
> openrisc DMA path and the hugetlb_vmemmap remap. Nothing frees those ranges
> concurrently, so they cannot race and do not need RCU. ptdump is the only
> walker that traverses ranges it does not own.
>
> Defer the free by an RCU grace period. pagetable_free_kernel() now frees via
> call_rcu() in both the async and non-async configs. The async path still
> flushes the TLB first, then queues the per-page RCU free. The page stays
> valid until any walk that may have observed it drops its RCU read lock.
>
> On the read side ptdump_walk_pgd() takes the RCU read lock around the walk,
> and walk_page_range_debug() asserts it with RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() for the
> init_mm case rather than taking it, matching pagewalk.c convention. A walker
> either sees the cleared PMD and skips, or keeps the page alive until it drops
> the lock. The owned-range walkers are unchanged.
>
> ptdump callbacks now run under RCU, so they must not sleep. The arch
> note_page() and effective_prot() callbacks only format into the preallocated
> seq_file buffer, and the walker does not call cond_resched(); the only
> GFP_KERNEL marker setup runs before the walk.
>
> Fixes: 5ba2f0a15564 ("mm: introduce deferred freeing for kernel page tables")
> Reported-by: syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6a287988.39669fcc.33b062.00a0.GAE@google.com/T/
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
> ---
> v5: reframe changelog around the pre-existing race and range ownership;
> correct the mmap-lock description (arm64 is the exception, not x86);
> move rcu_read_lock() into ptdump_walk_pgd() and assert it in
> walk_page_range_debug(); drop walk_kernel_page_table_range_rcu(); fix the
> pgtable-generic.c comment; document the no-sleep audit of the callbacks.
> v4: defer the free in both the async and non async configs, not just
> the async one. Move the walk under a named
> walk_kernel_page_table_range_rcu() helper instead of open coding
> rcu_read_lock() in walk_page_range_debug().
> v3: take rcu_read_lock() in the init_mm branch of
> walk_page_range_debug() rather than inside the lockless walker,
> which the arm64 split paths also use with GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL and
> can sleep.
> v2: use call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu().
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 7 -------
> mm/pagewalk.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> mm/pgtable-generic.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/ptdump.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 485df9c2dbdd..79408a17a1b0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -3695,14 +3695,7 @@ static inline void __pagetable_free(struct ptdesc *pt)
> __free_pages(page, compound_order(page));
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_KERNEL_PGTABLE_FREE
> void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt);
> -#else
> -static inline void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> -{
> - __pagetable_free(pt);
> -}
> -#endif
Okay, now we always incur a function call overhead. I guess it will be fine,
just saying.
> /**
> * pagetable_free - Free pagetables
> * @pt: The page table descriptor
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index 3ae2586ff45b..c0be87580989 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> * Note: Be careful to walk the kernel pages tables, the caller may be need to
> * take other effective approaches (mmap lock may be insufficient) to prevent
> * the intermediate kernel page tables belonging to the specified address range
> - * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove).
> + * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove, vmap huge page promotion).
> */
> int walk_kernel_page_table_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> const struct mm_walk_ops *ops, pgd_t *pgd, void *private)
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ int walk_kernel_page_table_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> * Use this function to walk the kernel page tables locklessly. It should be
> * guaranteed that the caller has exclusive access over the range they are
> * operating on - that there should be no concurrent access, for example,
> - * changing permissions for vmalloc objects.
> + * changing permissions for vmalloc objects, or vmap huge page promotion.
> */
> int walk_kernel_page_table_range_lockless(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> const struct mm_walk_ops *ops, pgd_t *pgd, void *private)
> @@ -692,9 +692,13 @@ int walk_page_range_debug(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> };
>
> /* For convenience, we allow traversal of kernel mappings. */
> - if (mm == &init_mm)
> - return walk_kernel_page_table_range(start, end, ops,
> - pgd, private);
> + if (mm == &init_mm) {
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(),
> + "RCU read lock must be held across kernel page table walk");
> + return walk_kernel_page_table_range(start, end, ops, pgd,
> + private);
> + }
> +
> if (start >= end || !walk.mm)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (!check_ops_safe(ops))
> diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> index b91b1a98029c..7a32e4821957 100644
> --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,13 @@ pte_t *pte_offset_map_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> goto again;
> }
>
> +static void kernel_pgtable_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *pt = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> +
> + __pagetable_free(pt);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_KERNEL_PGTABLE_FREE
> static void kernel_pgtable_work_func(struct work_struct *work);
>
> @@ -434,8 +441,15 @@ static void kernel_pgtable_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_unlock(&kernel_pgtable_work.lock);
>
> iommu_sva_invalidate_kva_range(PAGE_OFFSET, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
> +
> + /*
> + * Debug walkers (ptdump) may walk ranges they do not own and race this
> + * free, so they walk under rcu_read_lock(). Free after a grace period:
> + * a walker either already saw the cleared PMD, or keeps the page alive
> + * until it drops the RCU lock.
> + */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pt, next, &page_list, pt_list)
> - __pagetable_free(pt);
> + call_rcu(&pt->pt_rcu_head, kernel_pgtable_free_rcu);
> }
>
> void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> @@ -446,4 +460,10 @@ void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
>
> schedule_work(&kernel_pgtable_work.work);
> }
> +#else
> +void pagetable_free_kernel(struct ptdesc *pt)
> +{
> + /* Defer the free by a grace period; see kernel_pgtable_work_func(). */
> + call_rcu(&pt->pt_rcu_head, kernel_pgtable_free_rcu);
> +}
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/ptdump.c b/mm/ptdump.c
> index 973020000096..50cd96a33dfd 100644
> --- a/mm/ptdump.c
> +++ b/mm/ptdump.c
> @@ -178,11 +178,13 @@ void ptdump_walk_pgd(struct ptdump_state *st, struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>
> get_online_mems();
> mmap_write_lock(mm);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> while (range->start != range->end) {
> walk_page_range_debug(mm, range->start, range->end,
> &ptdump_ops, pgd, st);
> range++;
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
Any reason that is not done inside walk_page_range_debug() ? Dropping the lock
in between should not be a concern?
--
Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 4:10 [PATCH] mm: pgtable: free kernel page tables via RCU to fix ptdump UAF David Carlier
2026-06-30 4:10 ` David Carlier
2026-07-01 5:42 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-01 5:42 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-01 5:57 ` David CARLIER
2026-07-01 5:57 ` David CARLIER
2026-07-01 12:26 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-01 12:26 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-01 15:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-07-01 15:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-02 9:18 David Carlier
2026-07-02 9:18 ` David Carlier
2026-07-02 9:25 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-02 9:25 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560ce7db-1afb-421a-bac3-3710f8f1966e@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+fd95a72470f5a44e464c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.